Holder Signals Shift on Federal Drug-Enforcement Policy

This is a discussion on Holder Signals Shift on Federal Drug-Enforcement Policy within the Other Healthcare Law Issues forum, part of the HEALTHCARE LAW & MALPRACTICE category; Opening-day is still a month away. The Dow is nearly at a 12-year low . The snow is blowing horizontally ...

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Mar 2nd, 2009, 02:30 PM   #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,438

Default Holder Signals Shift on Federal Drug-Enforcement Policy



Opening-day is still a month away. The Dow is nearly at a 12-year low. The snow is blowing horizontally up and down the eastern seaboard, and Giselle is officially off the market.

It’s time to talk about marijuana.

Under President Bush, the federal Drug Enforcement Agency undertook several raids on marijuana dispensaries in California. The raids cast into sharp relief the gulf between California state law, which has legalized the distribution of marijuana for medicinal purposes, and federal law and enforcement policy under the Bush administration, which was decidedly less tolerant.

But under President Obama, the scenario might well be changing. According to this recent San Francisco Chronicle article, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder is sending strong signals that President Obama - who as a candidate said states should be allowed to make their own rules on medical marijuana - will end raids on pot dispensaries in California.

“What the president said during the campaign, you’ll be surprised to know, will be consistent with what we’ll be doing here in law enforcement,” said Holder last week. “What he said during the campaign is now American policy.”

So what did Obama say on the campaign trail? He told one interviewer that it was “entirely appropriate” for a state to legalize the medical use of marijuana “with the same controls as other drugs prescribed by doctors.”

More recently, after the DEA raided several dispensaries earlier this year, after Obama had taken office, White House spokesman Nick Schapiro noted that Obama’s drug-policy team had yet to take office, adding that the “president believes that federal resources should not be used to circumvent state laws” and expects his appointees to follow that policy.

According to the article, others think Obama may also drop the federal government’s long-standing opposition to health officials’ needle-exchange programs for drug users. Click here for a recent provocative story on needle-exchange programs, from the Journal’s Justin Scheck.

Last edited by wld_team; Mar 2nd, 2009 at 04:31 PM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark & Share



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

| More

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Format Your Messages
Add Forum to Google Toolbar
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The DOJ’s Shift on ‘State Secrets’ Policy: Rightminded or Dangerous? WSJ_law_blog Government & Administrative Law 0 Sep 23rd, 2009 08:20 AM
AG Holder Announces Major Shift in Drug Enforcement Policy WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Mar 19th, 2009 12:00 PM
Will marrying an H1B holder (or green card holder) cause any trouble to get TN visa Unregistered Other Immigration Law & Visas 0 Mar 19th, 2009 01:13 AM
Apply for Careers in Federal Policy USA.gov USA.gov Updates 0 Nov 19th, 2008 03:30 PM
asked to come in before shift, or warning will be given??? Unregistered Other Labor Law Matters 0 Aug 2nd, 2008 04:25 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 AM.