Wiretaps and subpoenas: Administration wants to continue surveillance law
This is a discussion on Wiretaps and subpoenas: Administration wants to continue surveillance law within the Government & Administrative Law forum, part of the OTHER LEGAL ISSUES category; The Obama administration promised Congress on Tuesday to negotiate stronger privacy protections for Americans under terrorism surveillance but insisted on ...
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,242
|
The Obama administration promised Congress on Tuesday to negotiate stronger privacy protections for Americans under terrorism surveillance but insisted on retaining current authority to track suspects and obtain records.
Liberals on the House Judiciary Committee were left unsatisfied, clearly wanting the administration to go further and pledge to curb what they consider abuses of the Bush administration. They repeatedly insisted that the law be rewritten to require better justification for wiretaps and subpoenas, and Committee Chairman John Conyers, D-Mich., even compared the Obama administration's position so far with that of the Bush administration. "You sound like a lot of people who came over from DOJ (the Department of Justice) before," Conyers told Todd Hinnen, deputy assistant attorney general. Congress is starting to consider changes in three expiring provisions of the USA Patriot Act, a counterterrorism law initially passed after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks. These three provisions require the government to seek permission from a special foreign surveillance court for subpoenas and surveillance. The Bush administration, while using the court, also had the National Security Agency — without warrants — eavesdrop on Americans and others inside the United States to search for terrorist activity. That program ended before Bush left office. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmark & Share |
«
Can is sue a county in Texas?
|
The DOJ’s Shift on ‘State Secrets’ Policy: Rightminded or Dangerous?
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NJ troopers continue fight to practice law | forum_admin | Attorneys & Legal Ethics | 0 | Sep 15th, 2009 12:00 PM |
| Surveillance law: What's legal when it comes to cameras? | forum_admin | Miscellaneous Topics | 1 | Aug 16th, 2009 01:15 PM |
| Law Firm Layoffs Continue, This Time at Blank Rome | forum_admin | Attorneys & Legal Ethics | 0 | Jan 17th, 2009 02:40 PM |
| Cuomo Subpoenas J. Ezra Merkin, Funds and Nonprofits | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 1 | Jan 15th, 2009 02:36 PM |
| subpoenas to defendants more than once | Unregistered | Civil Litigation | 1 | Aug 22nd, 2008 10:42 AM |
Forming an off-shore company? We can assist you in forming your company in 40 countries worldwide.
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 AM.








Linear Mode

