WORLD Law Direct Forums
Home > WORLD Law Direct Forums > OTHER LEGAL ISSUES > Government & Administrative Law > Wiretaps and subpoenas: Administration wants to continue surveillance law

Wiretaps and subpoenas: Administration wants to continue surveillance law

This is a discussion on Wiretaps and subpoenas: Administration wants to continue surveillance law within the Government & Administrative Law forum, part of the OTHER LEGAL ISSUES category; The Obama administration promised Congress on Tuesday to negotiate stronger privacy protections for Americans under terrorism surveillance but insisted on ...

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Sep 22nd, 2009, 04:28 PM   #1
Forum Administrator
 
forum_admin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,242

Default Wiretaps and subpoenas: Administration wants to continue surveillance law

The Obama administration promised Congress on Tuesday to negotiate stronger privacy protections for Americans under terrorism surveillance but insisted on retaining current authority to track suspects and obtain records.

Liberals on the House Judiciary Committee were left unsatisfied, clearly wanting the administration to go further and pledge to curb what they consider abuses of the Bush administration.

They repeatedly insisted that the law be rewritten to require better justification for wiretaps and subpoenas, and Committee Chairman John Conyers, D-Mich., even compared the Obama administration's position so far with that of the Bush administration.

"You sound like a lot of people who came over from DOJ (the Department of Justice) before," Conyers told Todd Hinnen, deputy assistant attorney general.

Congress is starting to consider changes in three expiring provisions of the USA Patriot Act, a counterterrorism law initially passed after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.

These three provisions require the government to seek permission from a special foreign surveillance court for subpoenas and surveillance. The Bush administration, while using the court, also had the National Security Agency — without warrants — eavesdrop on Americans and others inside the United States to search for terrorist activity. That program ended before Bush left office.
forum_admin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark & Share



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

| More

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Format Your Messages
Add Forum to Google Toolbar
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NJ troopers continue fight to practice law forum_admin Attorneys & Legal Ethics 0 Sep 15th, 2009 12:00 PM
Surveillance law: What's legal when it comes to cameras? forum_admin Miscellaneous Topics 1 Aug 16th, 2009 01:15 PM
Law Firm Layoffs Continue, This Time at Blank Rome forum_admin Attorneys & Legal Ethics 0 Jan 17th, 2009 02:40 PM
Cuomo Subpoenas J. Ezra Merkin, Funds and Nonprofits WSJ_law_blog Law News 1 Jan 15th, 2009 02:36 PM
subpoenas to defendants more than once Unregistered Civil Litigation 1 Aug 22nd, 2008 10:42 AM


Forming an off-shore company? We can assist you in forming your company in 40 countries worldwide.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 AM.