WORLD Law Direct Forums
Home > WORLD Law Direct Forums > OTHER LEGAL ISSUES > Government & Administrative Law > U.S. Bureau of Land Management frequently misinterpreted and violated a federal law

U.S. Bureau of Land Management frequently misinterpreted and violated a federal law

This is a discussion on U.S. Bureau of Land Management frequently misinterpreted and violated a federal law within the Government & Administrative Law forum, part of the OTHER LEGAL ISSUES category; Gov't says drilling policy caused BLM confusion by AP The U.S. Bureau of Land Management frequently misinterpreted and violated a ...

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Sep 16th, 2009, 09:06 PM   #1
Forum Administrator
 
forum_admin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,242

Default U.S. Bureau of Land Management frequently misinterpreted and violated a federal law

Gov't says drilling policy caused BLM confusion

by AP

The U.S. Bureau of Land Management frequently misinterpreted and violated a federal law that sought to expedite oil and gas drilling in the West, a Government Accountability Office report said Wednesday.

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 laid out new circumstances in which detailed environmental review would no longer be required before oil and gas developers could drill new wells. The BLM approved such "categorical exclusions" in 28 percent of some 22,000 oil and gas permits issued between 2006 and 2008, according to the report out Wednesday.

The purpose of the law is to save regulators time by allowing them to skip environmental impact statements and environmental assessments that otherwise would be required under the act.

The GAO found the law has improved efficiency, saving a few hours of paperwork for each permit. But the report also documents several violations of the law and noncompliance with BLM's own guidelines.

The law spells out five circumstances when categorical exclusions are permitted, including when new wells are proposed for locations where drilling has occurred within the past five years. Another exclusion exempts review when new wells are proposed for a developed field that has passed an environmental review within the past five years.

Environmentalists and others, including Wyoming Gov. Dave Freudenthal, have criticized categorical exclusions for allowing more drilling than might otherwise have been approved — a concern the report mentioned.
forum_admin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark & Share

Tags
energy policy act, environmental impact, environmental review, oil and gas developers, oil and gas drilling



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

| More

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Format Your Messages
Add Forum to Google Toolbar
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
United States Says China Violated Trade Law forum_admin International Trade Law 0 Sep 20th, 2009 05:38 PM
U.S. Says China Violated Trade Law forum_admin International Trade Law 0 Sep 10th, 2009 01:25 AM
land law Unregistered Miscellaneous Topics 0 Mar 22nd, 2009 08:08 AM
CVS drug store violated hippa law debioliv Miscellaneous Topics 5 Nov 21st, 2008 09:40 PM
Has ebay violated an internet law? SuzukiFan23 Internet Law 1 Feb 27th, 2008 02:53 AM


Doing business in China? Need legal help or advice? Contact our international and Chinese lawyers 24 hours! WORLD Law Direct offers an experienced team of American and Chinese legal professionals.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 AM.