WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Family Law, Divorce, Custody > Other Family Law Matters
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

California parents "do not have a constitutional right" to home-school their children

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Jun 24th, 2008, 02:28 PM     #41
Veteran Member
 
angel1964's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Aug 29th, 2008 07:21 AM
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 92

Default Re: California parents "do not have a constitutional right" to home-school their children

tanja you ahve no room to critisize anyone on here. Go back and do spell check. I know I make msitakes spelling but when your calling some out on a mistake, dont make mistakes yourself so I guess your not that educated at all. Home schooling is for lazy parents who dont want to get off there buts and let their kids have a life. They want to coddle them and keep them all to themselves so when they get older and have to go out in the real world they wont be able to with out their mommies. That is sick and home scholoing should be against the law. TBYTE you are jsut an idiot. Your words mean nothing. And now you have this **** jumping on your band wagon. Not a good wagon to jump on becasue TBTYe is not liked very well on a lot of these posts. Chess ,checkers,what difference does it make to you 2 all people are idiots except for you right.
angel1964 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 24th, 2008, 03:12 PM     #42
Veteran Member
 
tanja53's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Oct 12th, 2008 02:30 PM
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 42

EEK! Re: California parents "do not have a constitutional right" to home-school their children

Quote:
Originally Posted by angel1964 View Post

tanja you ahve no room to critisize anyone on here. Go back and do spell check. I know I make msitakes spelling but when your calling some out on a mistake, dont make mistakes yourself so I guess your not that educated at all. Home schooling is for lazy parents who dont want to get off there buts and let their kids have a life. They want to coddle them and keep them all to themselves so when they get older and have to go out in the real world they wont be able to with out their mommies. That is sick and home scholoing should be against the law. TBYTE you are jsut an idiot. Your words mean nothing. And now you have this **** jumping on your band wagon. Not a good wagon to jump on becasue TBTYe is not liked very well on a lot of these posts. Chess ,checkers,what difference does it make to you 2 all people are idiots except for you right.

Boy talk about arrogant you were the person who attacked us about our opinion, on schooling our own childeren and what we thought about the education system . You voiced your very over opinionated statement about how ignorant others were and how your are so much better. AS I said before someways work for some and others well then we have people like you. You may be very smart but you lack TACT and possibley you need some common sense and maybe understand not everybody learns the same.I dont think you are an IDOIT just uninformed and you should learn chess open your mind .
tanja53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 24th, 2008, 06:27 PM     #43
Moderator
 
tbyte's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Today 12:24 AM
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,227

Default Re: California parents "do not have a constitutional right" to home-school their chil

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post

The biggest attitude problems have been home school parents and their kids. Not all of them, mind you. Just the biggest behavior problems.
So SOME of the home school kids had problems, but some did not. And I assume that SOME of the public/private school children had problems, but others did not.
Then don't you have to admit at least the possibility that home-schooling was not the issue? And isn't is possible that the kids with the most severe social issues were home-schooled BECAUSE of these issues, rather than home-schooling being the cause of the issues? In Psychology, this error is known as confusing correlation with cause and effect.
As a social experiment based upon your own experiences you are dealing with a small sample set, you do not have a "double-blind" design as you were aware of which children were home schooled, and and you did not control for any "confounding factors".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post

I assure you tbite, I have plenty of years coaching, teaching and mentoring both kids and adults. I speak of my experience, and it is substantial.
I am sure I can at least match your experience, and I have not observed what you have observed. Therefor, all we have personally are mere anecdotes. This may be as much as a person like Angel1964 can understand, but hopefully legislators and policy makers turn to more substantial research before making decisions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by angel1964 View Post

TBYTE you are jsut an idiot.
And the researcher at the University of Maryland? Is she "jsut" an idiot too? And adminstrative staff of the Ohio Department of Education are "jsut" idiots as well?
tbyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26th, 2008, 08:06 AM     #44
Veteran Member
 
angel1964's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Aug 29th, 2008 07:21 AM
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 92

Default Re: California parents "do not have a constitutional right" to home-school their children

TBTYE, there are many researchers on many issues. I dont believe 1/2 of what they say to be true. Home schooling should not be allowed. Ban it. It is the kids who suffer and they dont even know it until they have to go out in public. HEres one example. The child I know who is home schooled and has ver little contact with ohter children, does not go out and play with other children and socially does not know how to act was at his one friends house. They were playing and the friend accidently hit him in the eye with something. He slapped him right across the face. That is not how to handle a situatin and if he was in the general public, he would learn how to handle situations. Parents are lazy.
Tanja and you attacked me about my opinion. And why is my opinion over opinionated? Please tell me? Because I dont agree with you and TBYTE? I think home schooling should be out lawed. Its not good for any kid. There are classes for all walks of kids. For gifted kids, for mentally handicapped kids, for disabled kids for kids of all walks of life. Get off your lazy buts, stop being so controlling. Your kids need to have social stimulation other than with their mommies hovering over them. Its disgusting.
angel1964 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26th, 2008, 08:45 AM     #45
Veteran Member
 
tanja53's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Oct 12th, 2008 02:30 PM
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 42

Default Re: California parents "do not have a constitutional right" to home-school their children

Quote:
Originally Posted by angel1964 View Post

TBTYE, there are many researchers on many issues. I dont believe 1/2 of what they say to be true. Home schooling should not be allowed. Ban it. It is the kids who suffer and they dont even know it until they have to go out in public. HEres one example. The child I know who is home schooled and has ver little contact with ohter children, does not go out and play with other children and socially does not know how to act was at his one friends house. They were playing and the friend accidently hit him in the eye with something. He slapped him right across the face. That is not how to handle a situatin and if he was in the general public, he would learn how to handle situations. Parents are lazy.
Tanja and you attacked me about my opinion. And why is my opinion over opinionated? Please tell me? Because I dont agree with you and TBYTE? I think home schooling should be out lawed. Its not good for any kid. There are classes for all walks of kids. For gifted kids, for mentally handicapped kids, for disabled kids for kids of all walks of life. Get off your lazy buts, stop being so controlling. Your kids need to have social stimulation other than with their mommies hovering over them. Its disgusting.

The way you put down "homeschooled"kids and their parents where pretty low.

I havent rules out and /or forbidd any kind of schools.

You dont know what is the best for my kids.
I dont know what is the best for your kids.

And please dont call me lazy.
I have raised 6 kids now all adults in public school.
And I have never "hovered" over them.


I am not for all this Chheerleading that exits in schools.
I dont get all the crazzy things around sports and games in schools.
But just because I dont get it and/or like, that doesnt mean that I want to forbidd it ot out law it.

I realize that others takes this serious.

And I am also a fitness trainer so I am not lazy bump who hates exercise.

I am old enough to realize that we all are DIFFERENT and with different views and goals in life.

And want to forbidd things just cause you dont like it is crazzy.

If we did that there wouldnt be anything left since we all think differently.

So who is the more accepting one and controlling one ?
Not you.
tanja53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26th, 2008, 09:58 AM     #46
Veteran Member
 
tanja53's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Oct 12th, 2008 02:30 PM
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 42

Default Re: California parents "do not have a constitutional right" to home-school their children

I find it very scary that there are people who dislikes other peoples so much that they want to outlaw those opinions.

Think about that again.
We dont that kind of a world.
tanja53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26th, 2008, 09:30 PM     #47
Moderator
 
tbyte's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Today 12:24 AM
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,227

Default Re: California parents "do not have a constitutional right" to home-school their children

Quote:
Originally Posted by angel1964 View Post

TBTYE, there are many researchers on many issues. I dont believe 1/2 of what they say to be true.
...so, in spite of ALL the research on hundreds of kids showing that homeschooling is not detrimental...
Quote:
Originally Posted by angel1964 View Post

HEres one example. The child I know who is home schooled and has ver little contact with ohter children, does not go out and play with other children and socially does not know how to act was at his one friends house.
...simply because you know ONE homeschool child who has social issues...
Quote:
Originally Posted by angel1964 View Post

I think home schooling should be out lawed. Its not good for any kid.
...you conclude that homeschooling is bad, and should not be allowed for anyone.

DOES IT NOT EVEN OCCUR TO YOU HOW STUPID THAT THINKING PROCESS IS?!?!

Probably not, because at some point after high school you simply stopped using your brain for thinking and reasoning.

Last edited by tbyte : Jun 26th, 2008 at 09:30 PM.
tbyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26th, 2008, 09:51 PM     #48
Veteran Member
 
tanja53's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Oct 12th, 2008 02:30 PM
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 42

Big Grin Re: California parents "do not have a constitutional right" to home-school their children

Quote:
Originally Posted by tbyte View Post

...so, in spite of ALL the research on hundreds of kids showing that homeschooling is not detrimental...
...simply because you know ONE homeschool child who has social issues...
...you conclude that homeschooling is bad, and should not be allowed for anyone.

DOES IT NOT EVEN OCCUR TO YOU HOW STUPID THAT THINKING PROCESS IS?!?!

Probably not, because at some point after high school you simply stopped using your brain for thinking and reasoning.

Tbyte.
Yes it just shows that even in a "public" school that they can produce kids who dont get "social" skills.

So I guesss that we should "ban" public schools now.

Just a thought.
What about all the kids who have used violence in school.
They have "great " social skills.
All products of public schools.

Last edited by tanja53 : Jun 26th, 2008 at 10:03 PM.
tanja53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 27th, 2008, 12:30 AM     #49
Moderator
 
tbyte's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Today 12:24 AM
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,227

Default Re: California parents "do not have a constitutional right" to home-school their children

Our public schools are currently so focused on preparing children for standardized tests that they never teach kids critical thinking, reasoning, and research skills.
The result is people like Angel.
It will be a great day when the "No Child Left Behind" act is finally left behind...
tbyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 27th, 2008, 08:50 AM     #50
Veteran Member
 
tanja53's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Oct 12th, 2008 02:30 PM
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 42

Default Re: California parents "do not have a constitutional right" to home-school their children

Quote:
Originally Posted by tbyte View Post

Our public schools are currently so focused on preparing children for standardized tests that they never teach kids critical thinking, reasoning, and research skills.
The result is people like Angel.
It will be a great day when the "No Child Left Behind" act is finally left behind...

Agree.
I am so glad that I don't have kids in school anymore.
My youngest graduated high school last year.
Before that I was worried every day he left for school.
The school was under lock down twice. Once a kid brought a knife to school and acted out another time is was a gang thing.

And then all the shootings you heard at the news.

So when you send a kid to school you take a chance.
Sad but true.
And this is public schools.

It is so scary what is happening in our schools.
So we can hardly say that public schools is way better than anything else.

One of the problems with kids is not how the get their education. Is is who is their when they get it.

In our time all across the world both parents work. The kid is left on its own.
And kids learn social skills from their parents.

It is not our schools that should raise the kids it is the parents.

A lot of parents dont have the time and strenght to do that.

It is not easy to raise a child. Even less if you have been working all day long.

It is like to have a little puppy or kitten.
It is cute when it is small and innocent.
But it grows up and it is not that easy any more.
tanja53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GENOCIDAL FEMINISTS'-COPS-MOB-"THE MACHINE" SEX PARTIES ICSAN DIEGO/MAS/CAIR Human Rights 2 Nov 5th, 2008 11:20 AM
Sen. Stevens on tape: "might serve time in jail" (Reuters) Yahoo!_news Crimes and Trials News 0 Oct 7th, 2008 09:00 AM
Judge was confused as why they were going to "dismiss the charge" and not "nolle" it Unregistered Drunk Driving, DUI, DWI 2 Jun 19th, 2008 12:38 AM
Parents trying to reclaim "runaway" 19 year old. Unregistered Other Family Law Matters 1 Dec 21st, 2007 11:13 AM
scam "work at home" business Unregistered Starting a Business 1 Oct 12th, 2006 10:47 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:55 AM.


Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2008 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.