WORLD Law Direct Forums  



Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Family Law, Divorce, Custody > Other Family Law Matters
REGISTER FAQ Calendar SEARCH Today's Posts MARK FORUMS READ
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Forum Archive

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button AddThis Social Bookmark Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 06-06-2008, 12:00 AM     #11
Top Level Member
 
Last Online:
Yesterday 10:30 PM
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 686
Default Re: California parents "do not have a constitutional right" to home-school their chil

Quote:
Originally Posted by angel1964 View Post
I think your on there level, maybe.
Try "I think you're on their level". Yeah, you got a GREAT education, didn't you?
tbyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 08:17 AM     #12
Veteran Member
 
Last Online:
Yesterday 08:21 AM
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 92
Default Re: California parents "do not have a constitutional right" to home-school their children

I could care less what this geek does. I had a very good education. I will not explain myself to a loser such as yourself. Spout all you want . I dont care to build a web site nor do I want to build a web site. That means nothing to me or a lot of people. People such as yourself who have nothing better to do than sit at home and critisize other people have the time to do that. I personally am a hard working person and have other more important things to do than build a website for geeks. You have no idea what your talking about when it comes to me so dont assume that you do. Your a loud mouth egotistical arrogant pig. Go play chess and shut your mouth for once.
angel1964 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 08:51 AM     #13
Top Level Member
 
Last Online:
Yesterday 10:30 PM
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 686
Default Re: California parents "do not have a constitutional right" to home-school their chil

Quote:
Originally Posted by angel1964 View Post
I could care less what this geek does.
So now you are insulting a 13 year old kid, who you never met, for volunteering several hours each week to help out other kids? Yeah, you learned GREAT social skills, didn't you?
Toooooooooooo funny!
tbyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 08:24 AM     #14
Veteran Member
 
Last Online:
Yesterday 08:21 AM
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 92
Default Re: California parents "do not have a constitutional right" to home-school their children

You posted it on here for anyone to say anything they like about anyone so stop talking about other people. Listen I dont care what you say or who you know or what you do. Your comments and suggestions are terrible and you constantly put woman down. So why dont you go to an all mens web site where I think people may care what you say.
angel1964 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 06:52 PM     #15
Top Level Member
 
Last Online:
Yesterday 10:30 PM
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 686
Default Re: California parents "do not have a constitutional right" to home-school their chil

Several people have thanked me for my advice on this forum, so I think I will stay, thank you very much.
Also, I'd be you have spent as much time ragging on your boyfriend's ex as I have spent "ragging" on women.
I believe both parents have equal rights, and equal responsibilities. I have no patience with men or women that deny the rights of the other party or fail in their responsibilities. I hold this opinion without regard to gender. If you can find some posts where I have given different advice or criticism to men than women on the same issue, please show me some links. Otherwise, you are once again talking out of your rear end.
tbyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008, 08:29 AM     #16
Veteran Member
 
Last Online:
Yesterday 08:21 AM
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 92
Default Re: California parents "do not have a constitutional right" to home-school their children

again you have no idea what your talking about. My boyfriends ex is a loser. I want you to tell me this. How do you think its fair that 2 people go into a marriage supposedly equally. We all know that 80% or more of the men in a relationship make more money than the woman as did my boyfriend. In the end she gets the house and all property, alimony, child support which is a given. He paid that even before he was ordered too. she got the child, and yet she cheated for 10 years, lied, manipulated, has turned her son into a liar and a sneak. She claims she has no money but she does everything. She had a hsyterectomy a year ago. and she claims she still cant work. Had 3 different drs sign letters for her so she can sit on her but and collect his money. And by collecting his money I mean he is left right now with $100.00 a week. How is that fair and equal. This divorce is going to go to trial because she wants him to pay her cobra for a year and he wont agree to it. She got everything else. She acts like he owes her something for her cheating on him for all those years and he finally smartened up and got out. And mind you the last 10 yrs he decided to stay in the house for the child they did not live as man and wife. They had separate bedrooms, did nothing together except to build a front for their son when they went to family functions or holidays. and all the while she was sleeping with every cop she could find. How is this right and fair? That is why I get so angry spout off about her. Please give me your expert advice on this. and seeing as I am a woman defending a man I am hoping that you can give me some good advice like you say you do for other people.
angel1964 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008, 06:37 PM     #17
Top Level Member
 
Last Online:
Yesterday 10:30 PM
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 686
Default Re: California parents "do not have a constitutional right" to home-school their chil

You're not good with this "reading" thing, are you?
Where did I ever claim that your boyfriend's ex was not a loser?
My argument is only that his current girlfriend is also a loser.
tbyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2008, 08:33 AM     #18
Unregistered
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: California parents "do not have a constitutional right" to home-school their chil

Quote:
Originally Posted by tbyte View Post
Her actions are a reflection upon her, and not a condemnation of home-schooling.

It most certainly IS a condemnation of home schooling! Home schooled kids tend to be more immature, selfish and ignorant of social skills. They tend to think the world revolves around them. Some are fine but, most are not. This is supported by many studies. I have met hundreds of home school parents and all of them are overbearing and controlling of their kids. They can't control the world so they control their defenseless children. Some day this will be illegal and none too soon! I know several adults who were home schooled and they truly wish their parents had not done that to them. They feel like freaks.

And what the hell does Columbine have to do with any of this? You truly are an idiot.

tbyte, you truly are an idiot.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2008, 10:56 PM     #19
Top Level Member
 
Last Online:
Yesterday 10:30 PM
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 686
Default Re: California parents "do not have a constitutional right" to home-school their chil

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
This is supported by many studies.
Cite one, or STFU.
tbyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2008, 11:04 PM     #20
Top Level Member
 
Last Online:
Yesterday 10:30 PM
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 686
Default Re: California parents "do not have a constitutional right" to home-school their chil

Watch. This is how you "cite" sources:
HSLDA | Academic Statistics on Homeschooling
Quote:
In 1997, a study of 5,402 homeschool students from 1,657 families was released. It was entitled, "Strengths of Their Own: Home Schoolers Across America." The study demonstrated that homeschoolers, on the average, out-performed their counterparts in the public schools by 30 to 37 percentile points in all subjects. A significant finding when analyzing the data for 8th graders was the evidence that homeschoolers who are homeschooled two or more years score substantially higher than students who have been homeschooled one year or less. The new homeschoolers were scoring on the average in the 59th percentile compared to students homeschooled the last two or more years who scored between 86th and 92nd percentile. i

This was confirmed in another study by Dr. Lawrence Rudner of 20,760 homeschooled students which found the homeschoolers who have homeschooled all their school aged years had the highest academic achievement.

Or how about The Wall Street Journal?:
http://www.oakmeadow.com/resources/a...WSJArticle.htm
Quote:
The high scores are no fluke. As the movement grows larger and more diverse, evidence is mounting that home-schooling, once confined to the political and religious fringe, has achieved results not only on par with public education, but in some ways surpassing it.

Those links were from googling "homeschool sat test averages". Took me all of 30 seconds.

Now, you try!
tbyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Two house scam" A sad story of foreclosure and witholding a deposit. redgrlx Other Real Estate Law Matters 1 08-09-2008 01:03 PM
Is a peace bond and probation the same thing? "confused" (Alberta, Canada) Unregistered Other Criminal Law Matters 1 04-05-2008 09:30 PM
Is a peace bond and probation controled by the same agencey. "confused" (Alberta, Can Unregistered Other Criminal Law Matters 1 03-01-2008 10:46 AM
Parents trying to reclaim "runaway" 19 year old. Unregistered Other Family Law Matters 1 12-21-2007 12:13 PM
scam "work at home" business Unregistered Starting a Business 1 10-12-2006 11:47 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:28 AM.


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct. Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2008 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.