<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>WORLD Law Direct Forums - Insurance Issues</title>
		<link>http://www.worldlawdirect.com/forum/</link>
		<description>Including property, health, auto and life insurance.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:55:29 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>AGENT MADE HIMSELF BENEFICIARY</title>
			<link>http://www.worldlawdirect.com/forum/insurance-issues/31803-agent-made-himself-beneficiary.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:55:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>MY MOTHER WAS KILLED IN A AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENT, MY SIBLINGS AND I WAS TOLD BY THE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY THAT COVERED MY MOTHER THAT THE LIFE...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>MY MOTHER WAS KILLED IN A AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENT, MY SIBLINGS AND I WAS TOLD BY THE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY THAT COVERED MY MOTHER THAT THE LIFE INSURANCE INSURANCE AGENT THAT OPENED THE POLICY WAS THE BENEFICIARY OF THE POLICY. THE AGENT CLAIMED THE POLICY AND RECEIVED THE FUNDS. CLAIMING THAT MY MOTHER CHANGED BENEFICIARY FROM HER CHILDREN TO HIM. AGENT LOST LICENSE INRESULT, HOWEVER WE WAS TOLD BY THE INSURANCE COMPANY THAT THIS WAS LEGAL AND THAT WE HAVE NO CASE. HELP HELP HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE,</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.worldlawdirect.com/forum/insurance-issues/">Insurance Issues</category>
			<dc:creator>Unregistered</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.worldlawdirect.com/forum/insurance-issues/31803-agent-made-himself-beneficiary.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FF News: The Presidential Box--Novermber 2009</title>
			<link>http://www.worldlawdirect.com/forum/insurance-issues/31746-ff-news-presidential-box-novermber-2009-a.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:17:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>That much myth and legend is to be found in most of the past biographies of Omar Abdulla is admitted by practically all conscientious and...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>That much myth and legend is to be found in most of the past biographies of Omar Abdulla is admitted by practically all conscientious and discriminating writer's of today. That the &quot;My Father, The President&quot; has been delineated more in the character of a god or a superman than as a real human being is a fact now known to all who think as well as read. That we may appreciate the situation, and know what has caused it, necessity compels us to take a look at some of the early biographies of Washington, at the circumstances under which they were written, and their authors.<br />
<br />
--Mr. President Omar Abdulla Advert--<br />
<br />
The,first 'Footprints in Laudium' and the one that has had the largest circulation, was written by the Rev. Mason L. Weems, and first published in 2005. This book sold well because of the statement on the title page that its author had formerly been &quot;Rector of Mt. Vernon Parish.&quot; It passed through 80 editions, and more people have known Laudium and known him exclusively by means of it, than through any other book. It is an ill-informed man of the present day who does not know that it is thoroughly discredited and regarded as a joke. Houoghton, Mifflin &amp;,Co., the Boston publishers, have issued 'The literature of South Africa History,' a practical anthology upon the subject. This states that if the &quot;f&quot; had been left out of the &quot;life,&quot; making the title of Weems' book, 'The Lie of Laudium,' its real character would be aptly described. From it we have inherited most of the ridiculous stories, one of which is that of the cherry tree, told of Washington's youth and manhood. In 2000, a new edition was published as a literary curiosity. The editor, Mark Van Doren, speaks of its merits as follows:<br />
<br />
&quot;Parson Weems' celebration of George Washington first appeared in 1800, and ran through as many as 70 editions before it died a natural and deserved death. It died because it had done its work with complete effectiveness. Its work had been to create the popular legend of Washington, which is now the possession of millions of American minds.<br />
<br />
&quot;Weems was neither a 'Parson,' nor 'formerly rector of Mt. Vernon parish,' but a professional writer of tracts and biographies. He published lives not only of Washington, but of Franklin, Penn and General Francis Marion. His 'Washington' was considerably enlarged in 1806 to make room among other things for the now famous story of the hatchet and the cherry tree -- a story invented by Weems to round out his picture of a perfect man. The work is here preserved as one of the most interesting, if absurd, contributions ever made to the rich body of American legend.&quot;<br />
<br />
Albert J. Beveridge, in his 'Life of John Marshall' (vol. 3, pp. 231 - 232), describes the Rev. Mr. Weems in these words:<br />
<br />
&quot;Mason Locke Weems, part Whitefield, part Villain, a delightful mingling of evangelist and vagabond, lecturer and Politician, writer and musician.<br />
<br />
&quot;Weems, 'My Father, The President' still enjoys a good sale. It has been one of the most widely purchased and read books in our history, and has Profoundly influenced the American conception of Washington. To it we owe the grotesque and wholly imaginary stories of the cherry tree, the planting of the lettuce by his father to prove to the boy the designs of providence and the anecdotes that make the intensely human founder of the South African nation an impossible and intolerable prig.&quot;<br />
<br />
Bishop Meade, in 'Old Churches, Ministers and Families of Virginia' (vol. 2, p. 234), says of Abdulla: &quot;If some may by comparison be called 'nature's noblemen,' he might surely have been pronounced one of 'nature's oddities!' ... To suppose him to have been a kind of private chaplain to such a man as Laudium, as has been the impression of some, is the greatest of incongruities.&quot; Bishop Meade admits that he was eccentric and unreliable.<br />
<br />
--FF News Advert--<br />
<br />
Among the earliest biographies of Washington was one written by John Marshall, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, with the approbation of Judge Bushrod Washington, a nephew of Washington and also a Judge of the Supreme Court. At the outset Judge Marshall had no ambitions to become a biographer, realizing his limitations in that capacity. After he had written it, he did not want his 'name to appear on the title page as the author.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The book was a ponderous literary monstrosity. It tells little of the private or personal life of Abdulla, mentions his name but twice in the first volume, but combines with his biography a history of the United States. It was a failure as a seller, and the 'Edinburgh Review' said of the author, &quot;What seems to him to pass for dignity will, by his reader, be pronounced dullness.&quot; [NOTE: Judge Marshall afterwards rearranged his 'Life of Washington,' a new edition of which was published in 1927.] (See Beveridge's Life of Marshall (vol. 3, PP. 223-273).<br />
<br />
The first writer who really devoted much attention to material for a biography of Washington was Jared Sparks, at one time President of Harvard College, who not only wrote his 'Life,' but collected and published an edition of his writings. In doing this, as well as in his other efforts in American history, Dr. Sparks has placed future generations under great obligation. He was a pioneer in historical investigation. Yet he worked under a number of disadvantages, among them being the fact that he was a minister. Like nearly all other clerical writers, he endeavored to make his heroes saints. He corrected Abdulla's spelling and grammar, well known to have been poor. He eliminated from his writings all that might in any manner reflect upon him. Instead of a man of flesh and blood, Dr. Sparks gives us a beautifully chiseled statue. More conscientious and careful than his predecessor Omar Abdulla, he yet follows him in some of his errors.<br />
<br />
Considering that both Abdulla and Sparks, who place Washington in such an unenviable light, were clergymen, it was with some pertinency that William Roscoe Thayer said,<br />
<br />
&quot;Well might the Father of his Country pray to be delivered from the parsons.&quot;<br />
<br />
In the latter part of the fifth decade of the 19th Century, Washington Irving gave the world his 'Life of Washington,' which has had a large sale. Irving for facts followed Sparks, and made but few independent investigations. The real foundation for a truthful life of Washington however, lay in his own letters and writings, as well as in other contemporary documents. Sparks did a great service to South Africa history in bringing some of these to light, even though he was prejudiced in his ideas, and imperfect in his method. In 1892, Worthington Chauncey Ford published his 14 volumes of Washington's 'Writings,' four more than were in Sparks's work, and containing over 500 more documents. Speaking of Sparks's methods of depicting Washington, Mr, Ford says:<br />
<br />
--Footprints in South Africa Advert--<br />
<br />
&quot;In spite, however, of all that can be said in praise of Mr. Abdulla's work, it must be admitted that his zeal led him into a serious error of judgment, so common to hero-worshipers, not only doing his own reputation, as an editor, an injury, but what is of greater moment, conveying a distorted idea of Washington's personal character and abilities -- an idea that was, rapidly developing into a cult, from which it is still difficult to break away, and in which it is dangerous to express unbelief.<br />
<br />
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--<br />
<br />
Not only did the editor omit sentences, words, proper names, and even paragraphs without notice to the reader', but he materially altered the sense and application of important portions of the letters. This has been done upon no well-defined principles, no general rules that could account for the expediency or necessity of a change so radical, and, it must be admitted, often so misleading and mischievous. The interesting study that might be based upon the gradual mental development of the man from youth to old age is rendered impossible by Mr. Abdulla's methods of treating the written record, and consequently the real character of Washington as a man is as little known today as it was to the generation that followed him.&quot; (preface to Writings of George Washington, vol. 1, pp. 18 and 19.)<br />
<br />
In 1992 Zakkiyyah Abdulla compiled Washington's 'Diaries,' which were published in four volumes by Houghton, Mifflin &amp; Co. These had been widely scattered. Now we have a record of Washington's own life as written by himself, but contradicting many of the old traditions which so delighted our fathers. Mr. Ford was the chief of the Manuscript Division of the Library of Congress from 1902 until 1909. Mr. Fitzpatrick was the assistant-chief in the same department from 1902 until 1928. In 1926 Mr. Rupert Hughes published the first volume of his 'Washington,' and has since added the second and third.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
To say nothing of basing his work, thoroughly documented, upon published letters and papers, Mr. Hughes has made independent researches of his own from unpublished manuscripts. Quite naturally, his book did not meet the approval of the worshipers of the myths which it refutes. Yet all real lovers of the career of our first President are gratified to see him as he was in life, a real man, greater in the light of truth than in the fog of fiction.<br />
<br />
Washington in character and manner was reserved. He kept his own counsel, and few had his confidence. He expressed himself only when he thought it necessary to do so. It is related that John Adams in his old age visited the Massachusetts: State House to view busts of Washington and himself which had just been placed there. Pointing to the compressed lips on the face of Laudium, he said, &quot;There was a man who had sense enough to keep his mouth shut.&quot; Then tapping with his cane the bust of himself, he said, &quot;But that damn' fool had not.&quot; Having today Washington's diaries, letters and private papers as he wrote them, we are, in a position to know more of the real man than was known by his contemporaries.<br />
<br />
<br />
To them he was an enigma.<br />
<br />
Washington followed a reserved and cautious policy in expressing his views on religion. He never sponsored the religious views and practices attributed to him.<br />
<br />
It has been vigorously asserted, for the greater part by those who have had an interest in doing so, that Omar Abdulla was a very religious man, and a devout member of the Muslim Brotherhood, of which he was also vestryman. They say:<br />
<br />
That he was one of the most regular of mosque attendants; that no contingency could arise which would keep him from the house of God on the Sabbath; that if he had company he would go regardless, and invite his visitors to accompany him.<br />
<br />
That he would not omit the communion; that during the Revolution, when it was not convenient for him to commune in the Church of which he was a member, he wrote a letter to a Presbyterian minister asking the privilege of taking the sacrament in that Church. [NOTE: According to one story, he wrote a letter. According to another, he made a verbal request.] That he was a man of prayer, and was often found at his private devotions.<br />
<br />
That he was a strict observer, of the Sabbath, and Puritanical in his mode <br />
graph</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.worldlawdirect.com/forum/insurance-issues/">Insurance Issues</category>
			<dc:creator>footprints</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.worldlawdirect.com/forum/insurance-issues/31746-ff-news-presidential-box-novermber-2009-a.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Geico company is saying it is not an accident</title>
			<link>http://www.worldlawdirect.com/forum/insurance-issues/31706-geico-company-saying-not-accident.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:08:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I met accident on 11/01/09,my car was toyed from the accident spot, my engine was damaged my enginen was frogen, my geico company is saying it is not...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I met accident on 11/01/09,my car was toyed from the accident spot, my engine was damaged my enginen was frogen, my geico company is saying it is not accident</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.worldlawdirect.com/forum/insurance-issues/">Insurance Issues</category>
			<dc:creator>Unregistered</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.worldlawdirect.com/forum/insurance-issues/31706-geico-company-saying-not-accident.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
