![]() |
|
|||||||
| Drunk Driving, DUI, DWI Drunk driving arrests, driving under the influence or driving while intoxicated criminal charges. |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Judge was confused as why they were going to "dismiss the charge" and not "nolle" it
I got a DUI last May and was ordered to an alcohol education program and 1 year probation. I completed the program and attended a MADD victim's panel like they requested and stayed out of trouble. When I went to court earlier this week the judge was confused as why they were going to "dismiss the charge" and not "nolle" it. The state's attorney said he was comfortable with it being dismissed, so it was.
What is the difference between the two? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Top Level Member
Last Online:
Nov 16th, 2008 04:36 PM Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 303
|
Nolle prosequi is a Latin legal phrase meaning "to be unwilling to follow through" or, more simply, "unwilling to pursue." It is the term used in many common law criminal jurisdictions to describe a prosecutor's application to discontinue criminal charges before trial, or up until, but before verdict.
Generally, the application to "nolle" or "nol pros" a case is made after the filing of an information or indictment, when the prosecutor representing the state's interest is of the opinion that an adjudication of the charges is not in the interest of the public and/or that the available and admissible evidence is not sufficient to satisfy a jury beyond reasonable doubt. In most circumstances, the court with jurisdiction to hear the case must adjudicate on the application for nolle prosequi, thus finding the defendant not guilty of all charges. To determine where the public interest lies, more often than not, a motion for "nolle prosequi" indicates that the prosecution does not want to pursue the case any further (be it a civil and/or criminal case). In the essence of the United States' jurisprudence, this motion is usually filed due to the innocence of the defendant, hence, "innocent until proven guilty." In a reasonable court of law, a motion for "nolle prosequi" is only granted if it is concluded the defendant is indeed innocent. In conclusion, this means the prosecution knows it does not have enough evidence (or any evidence) that a crime has been committed, and therefore must consider the accused/defendant innocent. The charges can be reinstated if new information comes to light or the circumstances of the case change during a given period of time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Last Online:
Jun 19th, 2008 01:59 AM Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 15
|
Nolle is actually a request by a prosecutor in a criminal action that the prosecution of the case cease. May be some counts or all with respect to some or all of the defendants. Mostly it is used when there are insufficient evidence or out of court settlement between the parties.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sen. Stevens on tape: "might serve time in jail" (Reuters) | Yahoo!_news | Crimes and Trials News | 0 | Oct 7th, 2008 09:00 AM |
| Judge denies "squawk box" case dismissal (Reuters) | Yahoo!_news | Crimes and Trials News | 0 | Sep 12th, 2008 03:40 PM |
| Is a peace bond and probation the same thing? "confused" (Alberta, Canada) | Unregistered | Other Criminal Law Matters | 1 | Apr 5th, 2008 08:30 PM |
| validity of "loan" written on check memo without an agreement for repayment | Unregistered | Business Contracts & Partnerships | 1 | Mar 7th, 2008 07:12 PM |
| Is a peace bond and probation controled by the same agencey. "confused" (Alberta, Can | Unregistered | Other Criminal Law Matters | 1 | Mar 1st, 2008 09:46 AM |