Check the China Trade Commission Fraud Black List BEFORE Doing Overseas Biz

[Sherlock Holmes]

CONTINUED FROM LAST POST DUE TO LENGTH RESTRICTIONS...

· The hacker then relies on such comments as “The China Trade Commission is not registered with China Customs” which is absolutely true! Why would or should they be registered with Customs when they do not buy, sell, trade, export, nor import any products?!? The CTC provides B2B services and has no legal requirement or need to be registered with Customs, but the false implication he makes is that failure to register with Customs absolutely indicates a fraud. Only people who import or export products are required to be registered with China customs.

· I also think most intelligent people would conclude that one person cannot be in two places at the same time – for example a man cannot be serving time in an American jail while at the same time operating an art gallery in Shanghai right or attending a Christmas party in Beijing right? See these links:

China Trade Commission Is Being Smeared

Also see the attached letter from professional magician Rob Rasner who personally confirms seeing CTC Director DeMarco in China every year since 2006. Anyone can contact Rasner themselves and get personal confirmation of this at info(at)rasnermagic.com.

“I have been performing kids magic shows for the China Trade Commission every year since 2006, and every year have I personally met with Mr. Anthony DeMarco, Ying, and some of the other CTC events staff in China. They never once charged admission for any of the shows I did for Chinese kids.”

You’ll also note that three private investigators (posting as “Scam Patrol”, “Fred The Fed”, and “Bandit Buster”) have already confirmed at Scam.com similar meetings in China and New York. (See the posts listed below at the bottom of this post) and Atty. Wu the legal counsel for The China Trade Commission, has been providing registered CTC members and private investigators a sworn statement that outlines the history and registrations of the China Trade Commission.

· Our hacker friend also erroneously insists that because the CTC has a new web site hosted in America “proves the organization is only a few months old” and he deliberately ignores the fact that the CTC has had a .cn web site used by all of the below people and hundreds or members and clients for more than seven years. See these links:

International Fraud Black List

and also this link here:

International Fraud Black List and this link as well:

International Fraud Black List

and this unrelated post also highlights how ridiculous it is to judge the legitimacy of a company or organization based on how long a particular web site has been operational:

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

· And while our hacker friend points out that the general inquiry email used by the CTC is a gmail account (due to high volumes of spam) he never admits that the .org and .cn email addresses are still in use and have been for years as anyone can prove by sending an email to inquiries(at)chinatradecommission.org. Instead he simply insists that “anyone who uses a fee email address is a fraud”. A convenient assertion for sure, but utterly false.

· And of course, Mr. hacker “confirms” the CTC must certainly be a fraud because the organization does not post their official address on line. Anyone who reads the CTC’s rebuttal and understands the dangerous whistle blowing work the CTC does in a communist country would understand why. See these links:

Check the China Trade Commission Fraud Black List BEFORE Doing Overseas Biz

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

Would YOU post your address on line if YOUR office was vandalized three times, or two of YOUR employees were beaten in YOUR parking lot, or YOUR wife received threatening phone calls? And really, are YOU going to be more or less inclined to reply to demands from an anonymous hacker who insists that you disclose more information about yourself – to him!?!. Keep in mind he was banned from Craiglsist, Alibaba, Trade-Key, and Kijiji for identity theft! One would have to be insane to say “ Sure here is my address, bank account no. email, etc. just to prove you are wrong about me”. Hell, why not give him your passport and social security number too!?! But take a look at this link which corroborates what was said by Mr. Wilson, and the CTC Rebuttals:

China Trade Commission Is Being Smeared

But our hacker expects visitors to either be too lazy or stupid to realize that the criminal Anthony DeMarco who was involved with bribery and a SEC investigation who is pictured in this link:

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

is not Anthony S. DeMarco who is the Executive Director of the CTC, who appears in a photograph with President Bill Clinton in one of the hacker’s posts. They look nothing alike, and their ages are obviously a few years apart, and the only thing they have in common besides similar names, is brown eyes. So then, where did they get the Clinton photo of Anthony S. DeMarco to cut and paste into the phony resume? From page 3 of the CTC’s July/2002 quarterly Newsletter that Atty. Wu sent me by email.

In yet another attempt to discredit 5 of 15 people who came forward with credible and/or favorable comments he either posed as a moderator with a post claiming that all the IP addresses of these 5 people are the same (which would indicate they are either shills or all using the same WI-Fi hotspot in a popular mall, or he’s not aware of Chinese government security measures which gives all email that is being monitored the same IP address. This is a discussion by itself but if you are interested, you can learn more by visiting these three links:

scams - View Single Post - Are Chinese IP Addresses Dynamic or Static?

scams - View Single Post - Are Chinese IP Addresses Dynamic or Static?

scams - View Single Post - Are Chinese IP Addresses Dynamic or Static?

Actually, the hacker claims the "Moderator" at Scam.com is the one who said all 5 people were posting from the same IP address when in fact, the link he refers to is NOT that of a moderator but rather a "Senior Member" named Mumbles. Only a moderator would have access to IP address info, but if people are posting from mainland China, that info is meaningless according to the above 3 links.

There are over 20 other similar discrepancies but intelligent people should see the writing the on the wall by now. If not, you can visit all the below links which are self explanatory :

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

China Trade Commission Is Being Smeared

China Trade Commission Is Being Smeared

International Fraud Black List

International Fraud Black List

Check the China Trade Commission Fraud Black List BEFORE Doing Overseas Biz

Anyone who takes the time to read all of the above links will quickly learn that NOTHING on the internet can be absolutely believed without independent verification and those who make the false accusations from the safety of a foreign country behind anonymous screen names should have no qualms about identifying themselves IF what they say is true. Lying about others online is now a felony crime in many countries and no hacker will ever expose himself to criminal prosecution by identifying himself. Here is yet another relative article worth reading:

Cyberspace Due Diligence Options - China - Country Risk

What is most interesting is that the fellow making all the false allegations openly admits that he never once had any dealings with the CTC, never met, corresponded, or even spoke with any CTC official! He further admitted “I am not yet aware of any victims” but still has the audacity to make bold accusations – proof positive that his only true objective is to taint and smear, and in this regard, he has done a very good job. Also note how long the posters have been posting on line. Our hacker friend is the new kid on the block (only four weeks on-line) and yet he calls people who have been posting over a year “Liars” and “shills”! And only after five days of posting at worldlawdirect.com, he gave himself the title of “Senior Member”! (At that forum he uses the alias of “Due Diligence” but you will notice the comments are almost identical).

Now then, if our hacker friend known as Interesting Observer and Due Diligence and ? (who knows who he will claim to be next?!?) are to be believed, then OldFartFrank, DripDrop, Hmmmm!, China Chick, Mr.Wilson, MoreThanCurious, Fred The Fed, ScamPatrol, Guest Visitor, Not Amused, Peter Kwan, YinYang, Suspicious Sam, Corvette Charlie, Big Jim Butler, Shanghai Susan, Chuck_In_China, Bandit-Buster, CTC-Beijing, WTF?1?, SwearToGod!, WhenPigsFly, Not Surprised and myself are all “liars” or “shills” and Atty. Wu in Beijing would be committing perjury as well when he certified under oath that he has represented the CTC since 2006.

And Interpol, the FBI, U.S. Marshals, the International Commerce Commission, and the mughots.com database must also be lying as well, not to mention the China Daily, Peoples Daily and CRI Radio in China. And of course, you’d have to pretend that you did not read any of the above today. Having done my daily good deed as an ethical netizen, I bid thee all good night!

P.S. In 2007 I investigated a case of a hateful ex-wife who was unhappy with a divorce settlement handed down by a judge who labeled the woman “a shameful schemer” in her ruling. Less than 2 months later, using anonymous names on-line and all the information she accumulated over 3 years of their marriage about her ex-hubsand’s business, the ex-wife posted 72 false claims alleging that her former’s husband import-export company was laundering money for some Palestinian whose father was an outspoken cleric. She posted phony ads linked to her husband’s mailing address, and even authored a phony “letter to the editor” in an Arabic community in Eygpt in her ex’s name! None of the allegations were true, but they managed to get her ex’s bank accounts frozen pending a investigation and IRS audit that dragged on for 13 months during which time his company collapsed since he could not pay vendors, freight forwarders, his rent, payroll, etc. In the end he was cleared, but by that time the damage was done and he went into debt paying legal fees that exceeded $300,000. This current situation with the CTC is a déjà vu event for me. The earmarks of this smear are all the same.

[Due Diligence]

Well, Anthony, your new fake profile is as amusing as the rest of them. Way too much to delve into but, there is so little of substance, I'll deal with the low points. Sherlock Holmes, claims he's a white hacker and even cites to news articles which talk about white hackers but doesn't say he is one! Which is typical!, as none of your fake profiles ever offer any verifiable proof that they are who they claim to be. He again advances the nonsensical proposition that all China IPs are the same and points to a new thread on scam.com that is supposed to support this silliness. The one cite in the five posts: How China Censors the Internet - List of Banned Topics & Blacklisted Websites doesn't say that all China IPs are the same?! Again, assertions which cite links that have nothing to do with the assertion. Now, "he" is saying that the image in the fake post by the fake profile is Anthony DiMarco? Well that's news to me. Who said it was? Another foolish assertion that every single person who is wanted is published on the web. Of course, since I, point out that China Trade Commission is an obvious scam, I'm a hacker, and my motives must be "envy", "revenge" or "commercial sabotage". Of course, there are millions of people out there than don't like scammers and take the time to post warning about them, but Anthony Dimarco simply can't conceptualize such an instance, that someone would simply uncover their scam for the sake of uncovering it. What is interesting is nobody actually deals with the facts here: 419 Advance Fee Fraud: Anthony Demarco / Dimarco / Gorcyca and the China Trade Commission Scam the overwhelming evidence that the China Trade Commission is a phantom organization created with a website, fake profiles, and free press releases by a felon, fugitive, deadbeat debtor, stock manipulator. Moreover, he has done it before. Well they say that I have somehow hacked into 20-30 websites, on different servers on different countries, including court records, .... oh, I did this undetected as well, and fabricated the evidence. Yep! Kind of silly huh?

[Raji In Beijing]

Originally Posted by Sherlock Holmes I have been posting at Scam.com for over a year – 9 months before these false allegations erupted. I have posted on other similar forums for over five years. I have no interest in, nor relations with the China Trade Commission, nor with anyone else who appears as a poster in this on-line dispute. Now having introduced myself, let me say this… Any hacker worth his salt (even a semi-amateur) can fabricate anything on-line and make it appear to be believable for a variety of motives – including to maliciously tarnish a party’s reputation. Others have already given examples and I will only confirm that I could, if I had a grudge and wanted to extract some revenge, make anyone look like a criminal on-line. And like the hacker who was exposed by his own former employee at these links: scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites · I would first create a bogus but believable resume that would contain at least 10% to 20% truthful information so that something would actually check out if checked, and then fill it with other information that I could then build “incidents” or “coincidences” around. After all, people who check out the 10% that is true, will likely assume the rest must also be true (human nature). If I was especially mean and cruel I would include a few lines like “rehabilitated and dry for over 5 years” or “successfully completed probation,” or “married 3 times”, or “achieved early release from prison for good behavior.” Or I could even make false employment histories appear on the on-line resume and then accuse and then publicly accuse him/her about lying on their resume! To see how gullible and naïve people can be about accepting on-line resumes as genuine, see this outrageous but very real link: Elba | Creative Criminals · I then find a person with the same or similar name that has some public record of criminal activity. For example, I want to smear John Doe in Hoboken (fictitious person), so I look for another John Doe in New Jersey or even elsewhere (about the same age and race) who has a criminal record or online complaints of some misdeed. I will now create a trail of phony incidents and “coincidences” linking these two people. It will become extremely believable if I can find and use some government agency links that talk about John Doe the criminal. Newspaper articles are even better. Most people will not even think to ask for a middle name, date of birth or photograph to verify they are one in the same “John Doe”. · I would then use hundreds of free ad, dating, and job sites, free classified ads and dozens of free news release sites to upload a dozen or so ads or “press releases” that I myself could create and link them to the person in the fabricated resume – in a negative fashion. Keep in mind that as a hacker, I know how to back-date any on-line document and I can also upload any photograph, real or cut and pasted from some other legitimate source, or use photoshop and create whatever I like or need to support my fraud. In this case it appears that a photo was scanned from some old magazine article (look at wrinkles in photograph) and inserted into the phony resume. Why? Because it was actually cut and pasted from a 2002 CTC Newsletter! · I could even create false posts of other people in the same thread without their knowledge, and even claim to be a moderator since most moderators are volunteers who cannot possibly check and read every posting. If you research on-line forums you will see that 90% of those who post only do so, one or two times while 5% are veterans and the other 5% are occasional visitors. · After I do all of the above, I would then create multiple identities and spread the rumors to other forums and to spread the same lies posing as someone else as this hacker has done. He is known as “Due Diligence”, “Mystery Guest”, and “Shuecraft “ at other forums. At one forum he even gave himself the title of “Senior Member” after posting only for 5 days to give himself false credibility. · If I am exposed or caught in a lie, I would call my accusers “shills” or simply resort to red herrings that would confuse people so much that they would stop reading and checking and simply assume that since I write so much, I must know what I am talking about. Now being able to do all of the above, I would link the “coincidence” to suggest something really shady or sinister. And if someone finds on-line documents that contradict or disprove my story line, I also know how to delete or break the link of that inconvenient source and can do so by corrupting the html code (like deleting a single character of the string or filing a dales abuse or spam report) Disproving a lie is very difficult on line and the more people try to deny it the worse they often look. As someone else asked in this thread… “If someone asked you on line “Are you still beating your wife John”, how could you possibly reply without looking like a jerk? How can you disprove an event that never took place? Could a husband ever disprove to his wife that he slept with a non-existent woman? Granted, all of this would take at least one or two days of fabrication and postings but if someone was passionate about getting revenge like this fellow Interesting Observer/Due Diligence, it is quite easy. Remember this hacker was exposed by the CTC and got his source of considerable income cut-off and his IP addresses banned and black-listed at all the favorite on line phishing holes (Alibaba, Trade-Key, Made-In-China, Kijiji, etc. so clearly the hacker has a very big ax to grind. See these links: scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites Disproving an on-line smear job is expensive and takes a long time for the party that is falsely accused and by the time they clear themselves the damage has already been done in terms of lost business, and even friends who are “shocked”. In this case however I see a lot of BS that a person of average intelligence should be able to pick up on. · First there is a glaring absence of any real victim of any real fraud. All frauds and scams create victims who lose something of value – usually money. There are no known victims of the CTC – anywhere (See this link: scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites or do your own search) · Most all on-line scams require the use of credit cards or Western Union to perpetrate a fraud. The China Trade Commission does not ask for either. · The hacker who is making all the allegations uses identities that were all recently created in the last 4-6 weeks AFTER he was listed on the CTC black list (See this link: Black List ). After others who have been posting on line for more than a year caught him in various lies, he ran off to another forum to start another thread where he would not be challenged with any inconvenient questions or arguments. · The hacker has changed his arguments and story-line 6 times at Scam.com and if anyone starts reading the posts there starting at post 27 and scrolling down will see the forest from the trees. You’’ll see that his smear starts with CTC’s dates of origination, to copyright infringement, to photographs, to then trying to confuse identities when he cannot put his finger on a single victim or identify the actual fraud he is alleging. Go to post no. 27 of this thread when you have an hour to read all the arguments and just scroll down for all the unedited comments: List of Scam Websites The hacker was caught deleting more than 30 on-line ads and press releases of the CTC that go back many years Here are some links that he could apparently not hack into: Expat kids get the chance to connect with Santa http://www.wanguoqunxing.com/cms8/mo...rticle&sid=600 China Trade Commission holds 5th Annual Technology Symposium in Beijing | PRLog China Trade Commission Offers $10,000 Reward To Expose Charity Scams - Beijing Today Events China Trade Commission Free Seminar - Beijing - Events Community | City Weekend Guide China Trade Commission Opens Beijing Office | PRLog ScandAsia.Com - Expat Kids Get the Chance to Connect With Santa Why would the hacker make these deletions? To remove anything that disproved his false allegations! As you yourself can see from the above links as well as this “community link” on the CTC’s web site, Community the CTC has donated hundreds of hours and considerable money to fund various kids activities in China for many years. Is this typical of a scam operation? · The hacker who claims the CTC was only formed in 2011 was unable to delete news archives and similar links like this one that go back to 2008 and 2009: China Trade Commission Opens Beijing Office | PRLog And he simply ignores posts from others who say otherwise, or calls them “Liars” or “shills” – the only convenient solution. He also forgot to delete this link as well which exposed his scheme in the early stage of its production when first caught, apparently by the hosting company or webmaster: China Trade Commission Victim Of Cyber Smear Scam By Vengeful Hacker Fraud · In post no 69 of this thread our hacker friend spews forth so many allegations ”supported” by links that he assumes people will be too busy to check out. I checked out these links and half of them do not say what he claims, and the others prove nothing – especially since most of them were obviously self-created by the accuser! He cites many phone numbers that are false, belong to other people, out of service, or always go to an answering machine. He selected these numbers for his fabrication after confirming that if anyone actually bothered to call, they would be able to confirm NOTHING and his claims could not be disproved. Quite convenient yes? Here is post 69: scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites · In the end, when no actual fraud or victim could be identified, our hacker resorts only to confusing identities (an attempt at “guilt by association) and at first he says the CTC Director was “wanted” then “released from prison in 2008”. Various people then posted news releases and witnesses proving the man was living and working in Shanghai/Beijing China since 2005. So the hacker was directly asked to provide the source of his information and name the jail from where the man was supposedly released. He refused to do so because he realized that if he gave a name of jail, that jail if contacted, would deny his claims. Likewise, Interpol database searches indicate that no person by any name put forth by the accuser is wanted for any crime – anywhere. See for yourself at this link: Wanted Persons / Internet / Home - INTERPOL Further, if he had the right guy he would be able to produce arrests records that indicate dates of birth, mug shots, scars, tattoos, etc. Also, when people are arrested, the first step of being prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced, a mugs shot is required, and this information is public information. Go to this link: www.mugshots.com and you will not find any mugshot for the CTC’s Director. If you read the above threads this hacker was asked by four different people to produce this documentary evidence and he was unable to do so.: He then alleged that the CTC director was on the “ICC blacklist”, but the ICC admits on-line that they have never even had such a blacklist! See this link: ICC-CCS refutes bogus blacklists. You can also visit this fugitive database which searches the most current consolidated files of 32 International law enforcements agencies including the FBI, U.S. Marshals, Interpol, Homeland Security, ICE, DEA, and Scotland Yard. None of the names that our hacker friends claims are wanted shows up here either: Most Wanted FUGITIVE SEARCH Also, none of the names provided appear on either the FBI’s nor U.S. Marshal’s fugitive lists, as can also be verified on line at these government links: FBI — Be part of the solution. and U.S. Marshals Service, Profiled Fugitives These are FACTS – not opinions, assumptions, or allegations. The hacker who claims to know so much about the CTC’s director did not even know his middle name, date of birth, citizenship, passport no., or even that he has lived in Shanghai since 2006. CONTINUED IN NEXT POST DUE TO LENGTH RESTRICTIONS...

Tp the person Posting as "Due Diligence", I want to say the following... Another poster called "IFIC" asked you some questions the other day that you did not answer;

"Name a fraud, produce a victim, a valid complaint, some evidence of a crime would be helpful as well. It seems like you must have had some previous contact or experience with the CTC if you are so hell bent on smearing them. There is a tremendously bias tone in your baseless accusations."

But you ignore his questions and just tell people to go read your blog at a419 Advance Fee Fraud which also does not answer his questions but talks about many unrelated things, which I must conclude is a distraction - "mixing apple and oranges as Americans like to say" Fred The Fed also asked you many times in this thread to identify a verifiable victim of any CTC fraud and you ignored him too! See here...

Check the China Trade Commission Fraud Black List BEFORE Doing Overseas Biz

Now then, you already gave us false information about "a moderator" at scam.com who you claim confirmed five CTC supporters were using the same IP. I checked out your claim at Scam.com and the party who said that is only a "Senior Member" and not a "Moderator" and only a real moderator would have access to IP addresses.For all we know, you could have put that post up yourself. Also because these other links from people who have been posting since early 2010, that IP comment means nothing as you can see here...

Are Chinese IP Addresses Dynamic or Static?

What does mean a lot more to me are all the things pointed out by the poster named Sherlock Holmes above especially his comments that prove information you gave in the past was false so you have since changed yours claims, And ultimately it comes down whether to believe you or the FBI, U.S. Marshalls, the ICC, The Better Business Bureau, and over a dozen people who disproved most of your allegations. Those comments of Mr. Sherlock Holmes are the most pertinent and can be found here...

Check the China Trade Commission Fraud Black List BEFORE Doing Overseas Biz

Sorry friend, I personally believe that a person cannot be in three countries at one time and it is obvious that you cut and pasted a scanned photograph from somewhere and this is not the same guy you want us to believe. The evidence and your refusal to identify yourself, a specific victim, and the confession of your former employee are overwhelming for me as explained here...

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

You also quote things that were never said. Nobody accused you of hacking court records - you just linked them to the wrong person with a similar name. Read what Sherlock says without putting words in his mouth friend. He is right -YOU are the fraud. I also believe you are the hacker described by everyone, and you are purely motivated by revenge as compared to the dozen of others who posted their comments here starting at post number 27 about half way down the page.

List of Scam Websites

[Due Diligence]

Hi Anthony aka Sherlock Holmes. You are a white hat hacker, and a licensed PI blah blah blah, no proof of that though, no surprise there. No proof that I'm a hacker either, or that I'm “Mystery Guest” or “Shuecraft “ or that I was exposed by the China Trade Commission and had my income cut off, blah blah blah. Yeah, but who really cares about proof, really, especially when you don't have any! Well, since you are a white hacker and you can do all these things that you say I did, why don't you just remove all the fake links and ads and what not I put up to frame Anthony DiMarco? Hey, since they are fake, you'd be doing the China Trade Commission and the internet a favor. Geez, at least notify all those hosting companies whose sites I have hacked into, that I have put up false information, or messed about with their code, especially since they don't even know! It should be easy, just sent them a link 419 Advance Fee Fraud: Anthony Demarco / Dimarco / Gorcyca and the China Trade Commission Scam Hmmmm, let me see, now most of the evidence I relied upon Anthony DiMarco aka Bruce Gorcyca and the China Trade Commission put up himself. He's, ummm, you, have been very prolific and were quick to realize that you could create a fake company or two using the power of the internet. So why doesn't he, oh, I mean you, just remove that evidence? I know you have tried to and have succeeded in a few cases. I'll check back with you on that.

"I could even create false posts of other people in the same thread without their knowledge."

Wow, that's interesting, why don't you give us a demonstration of that, besides the fake "Mystery Guest" profile you set up....oh and all the rest of them. Put up a fake post of me on here! You have my permission! I'll check back for that as well!

Oh, and of course, since "mumbles calls himself a "Senior Member" he couldn't be a moderator and wouldn't have access to IP addresses. scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites Oddly enough, "Dodobird" of Fraudwatchers apparently has access to IP addresses as indicated in this post: Fraudwatchers - View Single Post - Ibridges Immigration/www.ibridges.net/info@ibridges.net Visa/Job Scam?
put below her name is "Support". So apparently you don't have to call yourself a "moderator" to have access to IP addresses, you could be a "Senior Member" In fact, from what I can see all the "moderators" on Fraudwatchers have "Support" under their name, so .... they are not moderators???

Oh, and all those people, who he said were posted from the same IP address, who claimed to be, CTC itself, a bank translator, a couple of private investigators, a investment banker were posting from the same WiFI hotspot, at McDonalds? Or, one can believe that utter nonsense that everyone in China has the same IP address like this ridiculous and conveniently recent thread: Are Chinese IP Addresses Dynamic or Static? from more fake profiles. Even if you believe that nonsense, these fake profiles all claimed to be in China so they wouldn't have been affected by the "phenomena" described.

Here's a post here: Anti-Fraud International - View Single Post - Shinzo Nakanishi, Maruti Suzuki India Ltd (MSIL) I don't know "Shinzo Nakanishi" and I've never met him, or anyone at his company, MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD (MSIL). I don't know of any victims of this person or his company. So, it can't be a fraud, right? Well of course it is! I don't have to have met Mr. Anthony DiMarco aka Bruce Gorcyca to know he's a fraudster and that China Trade Commission is a fraud. As I've stated before, fraudsters would love that, and they give you that nonsense all the time. "How can you say I'm a fraud, when you've never met me"! "Come to _________ and I'll prove to you that I'm not a fraud." I know enough not to pay $5,000 to $10,000 for membership in an organization that says its been around since 1996 yet just purchased a domain 4 months ago. I also know enough to realize that there is no previous .cn domain that's been around for 7 years as there is absolutely no evidence that it exists. I've done enough research to realize that Anthony DiMarco is also known as Bruce Gorcyca and many other names and that he created the China Trade Commission out of "whole cloth" and its a fraud.

Oh, I never denied that the "China Trade Commission" puts on children's shows and Anthony Dimarco parades around as Santa Claus. Hey, if I want to put on some children's shows and have a Santa visit my day care center or mall or have a Halloween bash in China, then I'm sure Anthony DiMarco or the "China Trade Commission" is the person to call. How does that make him/them into due diligence experts who have been around for 15 years? You say I didn't identify the fraud. Saying you have doing due diligence and man other related services for 15 years when you haven't and then asking people to pay you $5,000 to $10,000 to join your organization based on that lie is a fraud! It's not complicated!

You say something about a post on Scam.com that I didn't put up not that that matters to you, however, you say that the links don't support what is said. Well be specific, you're supposed to be a PI, don't be lazy about it or is that by design. People will simply take your word that they don't add up. Here is a link to it: 419 Advance Fee Fraud: Anthony Demarco / Dimarco / Gorcyca and the China Trade Commission Scam Point out the things that don't add up. Oh, and no I didn't put Anthony's picture on the resume. Even without the picture, the resume obviously belongs to you, and that's fairly obvious based on where it came from and what's on it, but I'm not trying to convince you Anthony. Others can examine it and the links and decide for themselves.

Oh, and Anthony, oh, Sherlock Holmes, you profess to have nothing to do with the China Trade Commission - "I have no interest in, nor relations with the China Trade Commission, nor with anyone else who appears as a poster in this on-line dispute." yet you "know" I'm a hacker, and a "Alibaba" thief and that I was exposed by CTC and that they have a .cn domain. Wow, you couldn't really have any personal knowledge of that now could you? Oh you read other profile's posts and simply took them as fact? Hmmm, those posts could be fabricated you know....you are a white hat hacker and just illustrated how you had the power to do this, yet you believe everything they say? Ha!

Now to all these websites that Anthony's profiles cite as evidence that Anthony DiMarco is not wanted. Well, none of them claim to include every single person wanted in the United States, geez, honestly I already put that nonsensical assertion to sleep once more, so now you march out more sites. Part of the problem is when I answer a question, you ignore the answer. In this post - China Trade Commission Is Being Smeared I pointed out that neither Mugshots.com or Interpol list every fugitive that is wanted, but you march that ridiculous allegation out again and you double down and now include FBI — Be part of the solution., U.S. Marshals Service, Profiled Fugitives and Most Wanted FUGITIVE SEARCH, none of those websites list every person who is wanted so the fact that Anthony DiMarco aka Bruce Gorcyca is not on them means nothing.

Most Wanted FUGITIVE SEARCH is not even a law enforcement database. It is run by "Cuff" a 501(3)(c) non-profit!

U.S. Marshals Service, Profiled Fugitives clearly states:

"The list includes 15 Most Wanted fugitives, Major Case fugitives and local fugitives wanted by U.S. Marshal District offices. It does not represent all fugitives wanted by the U.S. Marshals Service."

FBI — Be part of the solution.clearly states:

While the Department of Justice strives to make the information on this Web site as timely and accurate as possible, the Department makes no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of this site, and expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in the contents of this site.

That's just common sense. No online database is going to list everyone that is wanted! So the fact that Anthony Dimarco/Demarco aka Bruce Goryca is not on the list means nothing.

Oh he is wanted, and he is the Executive Director of the China Trade Commission, which is an organization that doesn't really exist. He made that up just like he made up Scam Patrol International, the North American Barter Association, and Victims of Barter Fraud. The evidence is right here and its not a case of mistaken identity but draw your own conclusions viewers: 419 Advance Fee Fraud: Anthony Demarco / Dimarco / Gorcyca and the China Trade Commission Scam

He successfully had the charges dismissed without prejudice due to the government violating the "Speedy Trial Act". See: order of dismissal The dismissal was stayed and Dimarco was ordered not to leave the country, however he returned to Canada before the U.S. could re-indict him which they did. See: Indictment, USA v. Bruce Anthony Gorcyca, aka "Anthony DiMarco," "Tony Dimarco," and "Tony D. Marco", United States District Court, Eastern District of New York, Case No. 08-CR-9 (FB) From Canada, he moved to have the new charges dismissed however that motion was denied based on the fact that Dimarco was a fugitive. See: Order Denying Dismissal, USA v. Bruce Anthony Gorcyca, aka "Anthony DiMarco," "Tony Dimarco," and "Tony D. Marco", filed in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York, Case No. 08-CR-9 (FB). He remains a fugitive.

Oh, I never said ·“The China Trade Commission is not registered with China Customs” Another poster said that: China Trade Commission Is Being Smeared and China Trade Commission Is Being Smeared For starters, he or she stated "I have checked with Hong Kong Government Company Registry, CTC can not be found registered in Hong Kong." So take that up with him or her as I didn't check that information. I also never said the China Trade Commission was fake because it didn't list its street address, etc. etc. The reason why I know its fake are set forth here: 419 Advance Fee Fraud: Anthony Demarco / Dimarco / Gorcyca and the China Trade Commission Scam

[Curious Clark]

Originally Posted by Sherlock Holmes I have been posting at Scam.com for over a year – 9 months before these false allegations erupted. I have posted on other similar forums for over five years. I have no interest in, nor relations with the China Trade Commission, nor with anyone else who appears as a poster in this on-line dispute. Now having introduced myself, let me say this… Any hacker worth his salt (even a semi-amateur) can fabricate anything on-line and make it appear to be believable for a variety of motives – including to maliciously tarnish a party’s reputation. Others have already given examples and I will only confirm that I could, if I had a grudge and wanted to extract some revenge, make anyone look like a criminal on-line. And like the hacker who was exposed by his own former employee at these links: scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites · I would first create a bogus but believable resume that would contain at least 10% to 20% truthful information so that something would actually check out if checked, and then fill it with other information that I could then build “incidents” or “coincidences” around. After all, people who check out the 10% that is true, will likely assume the rest must also be true (human nature). If I was especially mean and cruel I would include a few lines like “rehabilitated and dry for over 5 years” or “successfully completed probation,” or “married 3 times”, or “achieved early release from prison for good behavior.” Or I could even make false employment histories appear on the on-line resume and then accuse and then publicly accuse him/her about lying on their resume! To see how gullible and naïve people can be about accepting on-line resumes as genuine, see this outrageous but very real link: Elba | Creative Criminals · I then find a person with the same or similar name that has some public record of criminal activity. For example, I want to smear John Doe in Hoboken (fictitious person), so I look for another John Doe in New Jersey or even elsewhere (about the same age and race) who has a criminal record or online complaints of some misdeed. I will now create a trail of phony incidents and “coincidences” linking these two people. It will become extremely believable if I can find and use some government agency links that talk about John Doe the criminal. Newspaper articles are even better. Most people will not even think to ask for a middle name, date of birth or photograph to verify they are one in the same “John Doe”. · I would then use hundreds of free ad, dating, and job sites, free classified ads and dozens of free news release sites to upload a dozen or so ads or “press releases” that I myself could create and link them to the person in the fabricated resume – in a negative fashion. Keep in mind that as a hacker, I know how to back-date any on-line document and I can also upload any photograph, real or cut and pasted from some other legitimate source, or use photoshop and create whatever I like or need to support my fraud. In this case it appears that a photo was scanned from some old magazine article (look at wrinkles in photograph) and inserted into the phony resume. Why? Because it was actually cut and pasted from a 2002 CTC Newsletter! · I could even create false posts of other people in the same thread without their knowledge, and even claim to be a moderator since most moderators are volunteers who cannot possibly check and read every posting. If you research on-line forums you will see that 90% of those who post only do so, one or two times while 5% are veterans and the other 5% are occasional visitors. · After I do all of the above, I would then create multiple identities and spread the rumors to other forums and to spread the same lies posing as someone else as this hacker has done. He is known as “Due Diligence”, “Mystery Guest”, and “Shuecraft “ at other forums. At one forum he even gave himself the title of “Senior Member” after posting only for 5 days to give himself false credibility. · If I am exposed or caught in a lie, I would call my accusers “shills” or simply resort to red herrings that would confuse people so much that they would stop reading and checking and simply assume that since I write so much, I must know what I am talking about. Now being able to do all of the above (and a lot more that I shall not reveal now as I do not want to give more ideas to malicious minds), I can use all three of the above FALSE FABRICATIONS and weave an elaborate smear story line that will appear to be quite believable especially when there are simply so many “coincidences” (that I myself created!). By themselves, each “coincidence” may be harmless information, but if I am creative and devious, I would find a way to link the “coincidence” to suggest something really shady or sinister. And if someone finds on-line documents that contradict or disprove my story line, I also know how to delete or break the link of that inconvenient source and can do so by corrupting the html code (like deleting a single character of the string or filing a dales abuse or spam report) Disproving a lie is very difficult on line and the more people try to deny it the worse they often look. As someone else asked in this thread… “If someone asked you on line “Are you still beating your wife John”, how could you possibly reply without looking like a jerk? How can you disprove an event that never took place? Could a husband ever disprove to his wife that he slept with a non-existent woman? Granted, all of this would take at least one or two days of fabrication and postings but if someone was passionate about getting revenge like this fellow Interesting Observer/Due Diligence, it is quite easy. Remember this hacker was exposed by the CTC and got his source of considerable income cut-off and his IP addresses banned and black-listed at all the favorite on line phishing holes (Alibaba, Trade-Key, Made-In-China, Kijiji, etc. so clearly the hacker has a very big ax to grind. See these links: scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites Disproving an on-line smear job is expensive and takes a long time for the party that is falsely accused and by the time they clear themselves the damage has already been done in terms of lost business, and even friends who are “shocked”. In this case however I see a lot of BS that a person of average intelligence should be able to pick up on. · First there is a glaring absence of any real victim of any real fraud. All frauds and scams create victims who lose something of value – usually money. There are no known victims of the CTC – anywhere (See this link: scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites or do your own search) · Most all on-line scams require the use of credit cards or Western Union to perpetrate a fraud. The China Trade Commission does not ask for either. · The hacker who is making all the allegations uses identities that were all recently created in the last 4-6 weeks AFTER he was listed on the CTC black list (See this link: Black List ). After others who have been posting on line for more than a year caught him in various lies, he ran off to another forum to start another thread where he would not be challenged with any inconvenient questions or arguments. · The hacker has changed his arguments and story-line 6 times at Scam.com and if anyone starts reading the posts there starting at post 27 and scrolling down will see the forest from the trees. You’’ll see that his smear starts with CTC’s dates of origination, to copyright infringement, to photographs, to then trying to confuse identities when he cannot put his finger on a single victim or identify the actual fraud he is alleging. Go to post no. 27 of this thread when you have an hour to read all the arguments and just scroll down for all the unedited comments: List of Scam Websites The hacker was caught deleting more than 30 on-line ads and press releases of the CTC that go back many years Here are some links that he could apparently not hack into: Expat kids get the chance to connect with Santa http://www.wanguoqunxing.com/cms8/mo...rticle&sid=600 China Trade Commission holds 5th Annual Technology Symposium in Beijing | PRLog China Trade Commission Offers $10,000 Reward To Expose Charity Scams - Beijing Today Events China Trade Commission Free Seminar - Beijing - Events Community | City Weekend Guide China Trade Commission Opens Beijing Office | PRLog ScandAsia.Com - Expat Kids Get the Chance to Connect With Santa Why would the hacker make these deletions? To remove anything that disproved his false allegations! As you yourself can see from the above links as well as this “community link” on the CTC’s web site, Community the CTC has donated hundreds of hours and considerable money to fund various kids activities in China for many years. Is this typical of a scam operation? · The hacker who claims the CTC was only formed in 2011 was unable to delete news archives and similar links like this one that go back to 2008 and 2009: China Trade Commission Opens Beijing Office | PRLog And he simply ignores posts from others who say otherwise, or calls them “Liars” or “shills” – the only convenient solution. He also forgot to delete this link as well which exposed his scheme in the early stage of its production when first caught, apparently by the hosting company or webmaster: China Trade Commission Victim Of Cyber Smear Scam By Vengeful Hacker Fraud · In post no 69 of this thread our hacker friend spews forth so many allegations ”supported” by links that he assumes people will be too busy to check out. I checked out these links and half of them do not say what he claims, and the others prove nothing – especially since most of them were obviously self-created by the accuser! He cites many phone numbers that are false, belong to other people, out of service, or always go to an answering machine. He selected these numbers for his fabrication after confirming that if anyone actually bothered to call, they would be able to confirm NOTHING and his claims could not be disproved. Quite convenient yes? Here is post 69: scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites · In the end, when no actual fraud or victim could be identified, our hacker resorts only to confusing identities (an attempt at “guilt by association) and at first he says the CTC Director was “wanted” then “released from prison in 2008”. Various people then posted news releases and witnesses proving the man was living and working in Shanghai/Beijing China since 2005. So the hacker was directly asked to provide the source of his information and name the jail from where the man was supposedly released. He refused to do so because he realized that if he gave a name of jail, that jail if contacted, would deny his claims. Likewise, Interpol database searches indicate that no person by any name put forth by the accuser is wanted for any crime – anywhere. See for yourself at this link: Wanted Persons / Internet / Home - INTERPOL Further, if he had the right guy he would be able to produce arrests records that indicate dates of birth, mug shots, scars, tattoos, etc. Also, when people are arrested, the first step of being prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced, a mugs shot is required, and this information is public information. Go to this link: www.mugshots.com and you will not find any mugshot for the CTC’s Director. If you read the above threads this hacker was asked by four different people to produce this documentary evidence and he was unable to do so.: He then alleged that the CTC director was on the “ICC blacklist”, but the ICC admits on-line that they have never even had such a blacklist! See this link: ICC-CCS refutes bogus blacklists. You can also visit this fugitive database which searches the most current consolidated files of 32 International law enforcements agencies including the FBI, U.S. Marshals, Interpol, Homeland Security, ICE, DEA, and Scotland Yard. None of the names that our hacker friends claims are wanted shows up here either: Most Wanted FUGITIVE SEARCH Also, none of the names provided appear on either the FBI’s nor U.S. Marshal’s fugitive lists, as can also be verified on line at these government links: FBI — Be part of the solution. and U.S. Marshals Service, Profiled Fugitives These are FACTS – not opinions, assumptions, or allegations. The hacker who claims to know so much about the CTC’s director did not even know his middle name, date of birth, citizenship, passport no., or even that he has lived in Shanghai since 2006. CONTINUED IN NEXT POST DUE TO LENGTH RESTRICTIONS...

I congratulate Sherlock for all the homework he did to expose the BS of Due Diligence. It is obvious this man has only revenge as a motive to smear the people that exposed him. I read the complete history here and at Scam.com and the stuff he posted at his 419 blog and I cannot help but notice many attempts by Due Diligence to clear the name of a fraudulent barter exchange which makes me think he was/is the owner of it and since two of his scams were exposed, he is understandably pissed off.

If anyone looks hard enough on the internet, they will find complaints against anyone, even this forum. The problem is that anybody can post anything and scream "Scam" without having to prove it. And surely by now, if the China Trade Commission was a scam, there would be at least one victim, if not dozens complaining all over the internet with scans of their canceled checks. Without victims there is no scam. And trying to link a criminal with a similar name in one country to a CTC official in another country is indeed creative, but pretty low in my opinion. Even worse, he quotes things that nobody ever said!

Just to make sure you weren't fabricating like DD, I also went to the Interpol, FBI, U.S. Marshal, and ICC search sites and confirmed that what you said is true. Other people who believe Due Diligence should do the same. If I was the CTC, I would ask "Mystery Guest" to come clean and tell everyone more about "Steve". That would be interesting!

So thanks Sherlock for taking the time to do what none of us had the time to do - check stuff out. He almost had me fooled until I saw all the posts at Scam.com and read this article you recommended.

Cyberspace Due Diligence Options - China - Country Risk

And of course, these links sealed the deal for me, especially after you found out that "Moderator" was not really a moderator after all. - Good work!

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

For anyone else still in doubt, try this...

Check the China Trade Commission Fraud Black List BEFORE Doing Overseas Biz

[Due Diligence]

Yet a new profile Anthony. Well apparently you didn't bother to respond to anything I wrote, obviously since you are not attempting to deal with anything on the merits as that's a losing game for you, so I'll put it up again and see if you can respond:

Hi Anthony aka Sherlock Holmes. You are a white hat hacker, and a licensed PI blah blah blah, no proof of that though, no surprise there. No proof that I'm a hacker either, or that I'm “Mystery Guest” or “Shuecraft “ or that I was exposed by the China Trade Commission and had my income cut off, blah blah blah. Yeah, but who really cares about proof, really, especially when you don't have any! Well, since you are a white hacker and you can do all these things that you say I did, why don't you just remove all the fake links and ads and what not I put up to frame Anthony DiMarco? Hey, since they are fake, you'd be doing the China Trade Commission and the internet a favor. Geez, at least notify all those hosting companies whose sites I have hacked into, that I have put up false information, or messed about with their code, especially since they don't even know! It should be easy, just sent them a link 419 Advance Fee Fraud: Anthony Demarco / Dimarco / Gorcyca and the China Trade Commission Scam Hmmmm, let me see, now most of the evidence I relied upon Anthony DiMarco aka Bruce Gorcyca and the China Trade Commission put up himself. He's, ummm, you, have been very prolific and were quick to realize that you could create a fake company or two using the power of the internet. So why doesn't he, oh, I mean you, just remove that evidence? I know you have tried to and have succeeded in a few cases. I'll check back with you on that. "I could even create false posts of other people in the same thread without their knowledge." Wow, that's interesting, why don't you give us a demonstration of that, besides the fake "Mystery Guest" profile you set up....oh and all the rest of them. Put up a fake post of me on here! You have my permission! I'll check back for that as well! Oh, and of course, since "mumbles calls himself a "Senior Member" he couldn't be a moderator and wouldn't have access to IP addresses. scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites Oddly enough, "Dodobird" of Fraudwatchers apparently has access to IP addresses as indicated in this post: Fraudwatchers - View Single Post - Ibridges Immigration/www.ibridges.net/info@ibridges.net Visa/Job Scam? put below her name is "Support". So apparently you don't have to call yourself a "moderator" to have access to IP addresses, you could be a "Senior Member" In fact, from what I can see all the "moderators" on Fraudwatchers have "Support" under their name, so .... they are not moderators??? Oh, and all those people, who he said were posted from the same IP address, who claimed to be, CTC itself, a bank translator, a couple of private investigators, a investment banker were posting from the same WiFI hotspot, at McDonalds? Or, one can believe that utter nonsense that everyone in China has the same IP address like this ridiculous and conveniently recent thread: Are Chinese IP Addresses Dynamic or Static? from more fake profiles. Even if you believe that nonsense, these fake profiles all claimed to be in China so they wouldn't have been affected by the "phenomena" described. Here's a post here: Anti-Fraud International - View Single Post - Shinzo Nakanishi, Maruti Suzuki India Ltd (MSIL) I don't know "Shinzo Nakanishi" and I've never met him, or anyone at his company, MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD (MSIL). I don't know of any victims of this person or his company. So, it can't be a fraud, right? Well of course it is! I don't have to have met Mr. Anthony DiMarco aka Bruce Gorcyca to know he's a fraudster and that China Trade Commission is a fraud. As I've stated before, fraudsters would love that, and they give you that nonsense all the time. "How can you say I'm a fraud, when you've never met me"! "Come to _________ and I'll prove to you that I'm not a fraud." I know enough not to pay $5,000 to $10,000 for membership in an organization that says its been around since 1996 yet just purchased a domain 4 months ago. I also know enough to realize that there is no previous .cn domain that's been around for 7 years as there is absolutely no evidence that it exists. I've done enough research to realize that Anthony DiMarco is also known as Bruce Gorcyca and many other names and that he created the China Trade Commission out of "whole cloth" and its a fraud. Oh, I never denied that the "China Trade Commission" puts on children's shows and Anthony Dimarco parades around as Santa Claus. Hey, if I want to put on some children's shows and have a Santa visit my day care center or mall or have a Halloween bash in China, then I'm sure Anthony DiMarco or the "China Trade Commission" is the person to call. How does that make him/them into due diligence experts who have been around for 15 years? You say I didn't identify the fraud. Saying you have doing due diligence and man other related services for 15 years when you haven't and then asking people to pay you $5,000 to $10,000 to join your organization based on that lie is a fraud! It's not complicated! You say something about a post on Scam.com that I didn't put up not that that matters to you, however, you say that the links don't support what is said. Well be specific, you're supposed to be a PI, don't be lazy about it or is that by design. People will simply take your word that they don't add up. Here is a link to it: 419 Advance Fee Fraud: Anthony Demarco / Dimarco / Gorcyca and the China Trade Commission Scam Point out the things that don't add up. Oh, and no I didn't put Anthony's picture on the resume. Even without the picture, the resume obviously belongs to you, and that's fairly obvious based on where it came from and what's on it, but I'm not trying to convince you Anthony. Others can examine it and the links and decide for themselves. Oh, and Anthony, oh, Sherlock Holmes, you profess to have nothing to do with the China Trade Commission - "I have no interest in, nor relations with the China Trade Commission, nor with anyone else who appears as a poster in this on-line dispute." yet you "know" I'm a hacker, and a "Alibaba" thief and that I was exposed by CTC and that they have a .cn domain. Wow, you couldn't really have any personal knowledge of that now could you? Oh you read other profile's posts and simply took them as fact? Hmmm, those posts could be fabricated you know....you are a white hat hacker and just illustrated how you had the power to do this, yet you believe everything they say? Ha! Now to all these websites that Anthony's profiles cite as evidence that Anthony DiMarco is not wanted. Well, none of them claim to include every single person wanted in the United States, geez, honestly I already put that nonsensical assertion to sleep once more, so now you march out more sites. Part of the problem is when I answer a question, you ignore the answer. In this post - China Trade Commission Is Being Smeared I pointed out that neither Mugshots.com or Interpol list every fugitive that is wanted, but you march that ridiculous allegation out again and you double down and now include FBI — Be part of the solution., U.S. Marshals Service, Profiled Fugitives and Most Wanted FUGITIVE SEARCH, none of those websites list every person who is wanted so the fact that Anthony DiMarco aka Bruce Gorcyca is not on them means nothing. Most Wanted FUGITIVE SEARCH is not even a law enforcement database. It is run by "Cuff" a 501(3)(c) non-profit! U.S. Marshals Service, Profiled Fugitives clearly states: "The list includes 15 Most Wanted fugitives, Major Case fugitives and local fugitives wanted by U.S. Marshal District offices. It does not represent all fugitives wanted by the U.S. Marshals Service." FBI — Be part of the solution.clearly states: While the Department of Justice strives to make the information on this Web site as timely and accurate as possible, the Department makes no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of this site, and expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in the contents of this site. That's just common sense. No online database is going to list everyone that is wanted! So the fact that Anthony Dimarco/Demarco aka Bruce Goryca is not on the list means nothing. Oh he is wanted, and he is the Executive Director of the China Trade Commission, which is an organization that doesn't really exist. He made that up just like he made up Scam Patrol International, the North American Barter Association, and Victims of Barter Fraud. The evidence is right here and its not a case of mistaken identity but draw your own conclusions viewers: 419 Advance Fee Fraud: Anthony Demarco / Dimarco / Gorcyca and the China Trade Commission Scam He successfully had the charges dismissed without prejudice due to the government violating the "Speedy Trial Act". See: order of dismissal The dismissal was stayed and Dimarco was ordered not to leave the country, however he returned to Canada before the U.S. could re-indict him which they did. See: Indictment, USA v. Bruce Anthony Gorcyca, aka "Anthony DiMarco," "Tony Dimarco," and "Tony D. Marco", United States District Court, Eastern District of New York, Case No. 08-CR-9 (FB) From Canada, he moved to have the new charges dismissed however that motion was denied based on the fact that Dimarco was a fugitive. See: Order Denying Dismissal, USA v. Bruce Anthony Gorcyca, aka "Anthony DiMarco," "Tony Dimarco," and "Tony D. Marco", filed in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York, Case No. 08-CR-9 (FB). He remains a fugitive. Oh, I never said ·“The China Trade Commission is not registered with China Customs” Another poster said that: China Trade Commission Is Being Smeared and China Trade Commission Is Being Smeared For starters, he or she stated "I have checked with Hong Kong Government Company Registry, CTC can not be found registered in Hong Kong." So take that up with him or her as I didn't check that information. I also never said the China Trade Commission was fake because it didn't list its street address, etc. etc. The reason why I know its fake are set forth here: 419 Advance Fee Fraud: Anthony Demarco / Dimarco / Gorcyca and the China Trade Commission Scam

[Mystery Guest]

Even though Steve, Folmer, and Robert (Steve's cousin that did the actual hacking) have threatened to get my probation revoked I want everyone to know that what what Sherlock says here at this link is almost 100% exactly how Steve and company made their slander attack against the China Trade Commission: (Part 1 & 2)

Check the China Trade Commission Fraud Black List BEFORE Doing Overseas Biz

Check the China Trade Commission Fraud Black List BEFORE Doing Overseas Biz

As I said a few weeks ago, I used to work for Steve and his gang for 3 years blogging and spamming for his barter exchange (MBE) and I also taught him how to post blind ads at Alibaba, Trade Key, Craigslist, and Kijiji. While he was making over $30,000 a week he only paid me and Billy $500 a week.

http://www.scam.com/showpost.php?p=1088667&postcount=58

http://www.scam.com/showpost.php?p=1089172&postcount=60

When Scam Patrol and the CTC exposed both of his operations in July he went ballistic and now he spends his time drinking and smearing the CTC and Scam Patrol. He also put up a 419 Advance Fee Fraud blog site and jokes that if anyone says anything positive about the CTC there he just deletes it. Sure enough when I posted my apology to the China Trade Commission there, it was gone the next day!

Steve is now obsessed with revenge and my former co-workers says he lost over $180,000 for the six weeks his IP addresses got blocked because of the CTC, but they say he rented another executive suite in Lehigh, and he is up and running again!

I changed the password on this account so Steve can't use it anymore. Attached is an old photo of Steve when he dyed his hair for a franchise scam 5 years ago and the other is another photo of him when he shaved his hair two summers ago. He often disguises himself with wigs, glasses, facial hair whenever he has to meet with people he plans to rip off. And whenever he has to sign contracts he always scribbles a "signature" that looks nothing like his real one. Now you know what a great guy Steve is. And until he pays me the $2.000 he still owes me I will continue to tell everyone about him and all of his criminal activity on the Internet.

Here's the best part... Steve carries around a bible and introduces himself as a "born again Christian". How many born again Christians do you know that spend over $5,000 a month on street hookers and another $5,000 on cocaine?

May the Lord be with YOU too Steve!

(There is no way for me to attach a photo of Steve here so anyone who wants to know what he looks like can see him at Scam.com at this link below)

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

[Due Diligence]

Well, Anthony, or is it Bruce today? I see you're back to playing with your true friends, fake online profiles. I honestly don't know how you keep up with it all. Do you really think anyone but your online profiles believe that this "Mystery Guest" is anyone thing but a tuber unearthed from the fertile ground of your imagination? That they don't think its is rather telling that the avatar this fake profile uses is the precise avatar a moderator on Fraudwatchers chose for his or her profile as seen in these posts: See: scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites and scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites and the name "Mystery Guest" is a bastardization of his or her forum name "mysteryquest"? How many coincidences do you get before it becomes obvious you're a liar???

Scam Patrol and China Trade Commission didn't expose anything. Scam Patrol doesn't exist. A moderator on scam.com has already determined that Scam Patrol along with Chuck_In_China, CTC-BEIJING, Peter Kwan and YinYang all posted from the same IP address and are not to be believed no more than the foolish proposition that all Chinese IPs are the same that your other fake profile proffered. scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

Sherlock Holmes was 100% was telling the truth huh? Yeah, here's a character who states he's a hacker and a PI though not providing verification that he actually is, typical of all your fake profiles. He further states that you can't believe anything you see on the internet and that he has nothing to do with CTC or anyone affiliated with it. Then he proceeds to beleive every silly allegation every one of your fake profiles makes, including those of Scam Patrol, Chuck_In_China, CTC-BEIJING, Peter Kwan and YinYang which have already been found to be fake and then says all the Chinese IP addresses are the same? Then he produces a string of websites and makes the stupid assertion that if Anthony DiMarco isn't listed on them he's not wanted. I already dealt with all that nonsense earlier.

And you are still trying to say that Merchants Barter Exchange was a fraud because they fired the fraud, that would be you, Anthony Dimarco aka Bruce Gorcyca. You can read: 419 Advance Fee Fraud: Anthony Demarco / Dimarco / Gorcyca and the China Trade Commission Scam which you already have. I don't know Steve Bolles but I'm sure he's too busy running his business, MBE, to be bothered with writing a blog as if that's believable. Your allegations are always so convenient and custom made to be believable. MBE was never a fraud.

See this post by "Scam Patrol - Scam Patrol International" Merchants Barter Exchange FRAUD - Steve Bolles One of Scam Patrol International's dubious claims to fame is that they exposed the "Merchants Barter Exchange" as a scam. SPI shared the credit for this exposure with CTC though there is no independent internet confirmation that there was a fraud or that SPI or CTC exposed it besides free press releases and forum posts:

For starters look at this quote from this "Scam Patrol"'s post:scams - View Single Post - Merchants Barter Exchange FRAUD - Steve Bolles

d) MBE and Steve Bolles were convicted in 2007 in federal court (Tommy Roberts Vs. Merchants Barter Exchange) of racketeering (Franchise Fraud) and their appeal was turned down in 2008.

Well "convicted" implies it was criminal and it was a civil case. MBE and Steve Bolles actually won in the lower court as the case against them was dismissed. It was the plaintiffs, Tommy Roberts, et al. who appealed, and who ultimately withdrew their appeal! The sentence was a complete misrepresentation of the facts designed to portray Steve Bolles and MBE as felonious villains.

Moreover, look at the link included in Scam Patrol's post: Tommy Roberts, et al v. Merchants Barter Exchange, et al: Justia Dockets & Filings The case is 08-1833 and it was filed March 27, 2008 in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

The case that was being appealed was filed in the United District Court of New Jersey, 06-5402 (SRC) and it was filed against MERCHANTS BARTER EXCHANGE, and STEVEN ROBERT BOLLES, however, there is another defendant:

DOMINIC NICK RUSSO, also known as STANTON STAN MARTIN aka BRUCE A. GORCYCA aka ANTHONY DIMARCO aka HENRY ROMANO aka WILLIAM BILL SHEFFIELD aka PAUL DAVIS aka IAN PHILLIPS aka ED GOSPEL aka CINDY STRAUB aka NATHAN FORBES aka DAVID STRYZINSKI aka BRENDA GRABOWSKI aka CYNTHIA KWAN aka STUART WHITBY aka JERRY PLUMMER aka LIZ WHITLEY and LINDA

Yep, you again, The complaint can be downloaded at this link. I downloaded it from the District Court. Here is a free press release that claims it was you, Anthony aka Bruce, who was responsible for any "scam." Steve Bolles and Merchants Barter Exonerated by Scam Research For Merchants

After much investigation into the complaints against Steve Bolles and Merchants Barter, we have determined that the posts on Ripoff Report are COMPLETELY untrue. Although they appear to be from multiple people in Pennsylvania, they originate from one ip address. Several years ago, Merchants Barter terminated the services of the marketing firm MGM, represented by Anthony Bruce Gorcyca DiMarco. He used the alias of Stanton Martin and his wife Linda Dimarco according to documents originating from his fax number. I have viewed agreements that Mr. Bolles and Gorcyca signed stating that “only documents and marketing materials approved in writing, could be used in the promotion of Merchants Barter Exchange”

I have viewed both the approved materials and also the unauthorized documents faxed to prospects originating from Gorcyca’s fax number. I have also viewed the faxes from Gorcyca to Bolles after his true identity had been exposed. They can be explained as nothing short of a psychotic episode. One sentence he admitted to the multiple aliases and creation of NABA to promote Merchants Barter. Then, offended that Bolles would think he was unethical. Gorcyca made pleas to continue their relationship as “much money was to be made”.

So Merchant Barter Exchange and Steve Bolles were never a scam. You're the scammer. You created the NABA, i.e. North American Barter Association, first to help Steven and MBE until they figured out what you were doing and fired you. Then you used it to be get retribution which you're still doing now.

Look at this post from "Scam Patrol" here: scams - View Single Post - Merchants Barter Exchange FRAUD - Steve Bolles":

As for Merchants Barter Exchange we did some digging and uncovered the following facts: a) They are not now nor ever was a member of any reputable barter or trade association including NATE, IRTA, and NABA.

Look at who issued this free September 19, 2005 press release from the supposed National American Barter Association aka the NABA: Is Barter Smarter? Here's What the Latest Stats Say

Brenda Grabowski
NORTH AMERICAN BARTER ASSOCIATION
647-295-4647

Yep, that's the phone number belonging to Oxford English Academy from the resume you posted here: http:// www.boyatimes.com/Teacher2.aspx?id=81 and then removed, but it can be seen here and here: http://419advancefeefraud.blogspot.c...ina-trade.html Yeah, "Brenda Grabowski"? is one of your aliases from Tommy Roberts, et al v. Merchants Barter Exchange, et al. I don't know how you keep it all straight. Well you don't, but I don't have time to get into that right now. So, the NBA was a totally fictional organization you created.

Well let's follow the story further. The "NABA" moved their offices to Chicago as indicated in this press release - after 17 years in the Big Apple???: North American Barter Association Opens New Chicago HQ Offices

In an unrelated matter NABA wishes to notify the public that due to pranksters who had a computerized redialer repeatedly calling our 1-800 fraud hotline for 3 straight days at 50 cents per call, we had to disconnect service to that number until further notice.

This was put out by "Paul Davis", Public Affairs Director and "Nathan Forbes," NABA's Executive Director, two more of your aliases from Tommy Roberts, et al v. Merchants Barter Exchange, et al.

Here's another one featuring "Nathan Forbes" again and "David Stryzinski" as the chief investigator who is yet another alias from Tommy Roberts, et al v. Merchants Barter Exchange, et al. Barter Exchange Fraud Cost Merchants Millions

NABA also believes these fraudsters employ a full time hacker to cruise the Internet and remove any links of complaints, bankruptcies, and law suits involving the exchange.

NABA put out another press release by Nathan Forbes here implicating Steve Bolles and MBE: NABA Clarifies Merchant Barter Exchange Fraud Investigation - Apologizes for confusion created by MB

Finally, this press release by Merchants Barter Exchange attempting to clarify allegations against it. Merchants Barter Exchange (mbe) Creates New Web Page To Set The Record Straight Against Rumors.

Beginning on August 3, 2006 MBE received information that a North American Barter Association (NABA) press release was on the Internet with extremely negative information regarding MBE. Many fabricated news releases followed with fake names and numbers. These press releases are completely erroneous and MBE is not now, nor has ever been affiliated with North American Barter Association – NABA. The fact is NABA does not exist, and was concocted with a onslaught of bogus press releases by a former MBE employee hired to handle marketing projects. After learning of several instances of unprofessional and unethical business behavior MBE terminated the employee.

Wow, well that press release conforms to the one by "Scam Research" Steve Bolles and Merchants Barter Exonerated by Scam Research For Merchants In fact, this also alleges that NABA was a fictional entity created to promote and then attack Steve Boles and MBE. It goes further though in alleging that you attempting to profit off the "Merchants Barter Exchange scam" by selling a $9.95 anti-fraud booklet through "North American Barter Association" and you created, "Victims of Barter Fraud." ARE VICTIMS OF BARTER FRAUD COMMITTING THEIR OWN SCAM? Yes, it gets complicated! It's amazing what can be done with free press releases!

Here is the free press release where NABA offers a 60 page "anti-fraud prevention guide" NABA WARNS INVESTORS AND MERCHANTS OF BARTER EXCHANGE FRAUD The guide is free to members, however, there are no members!

"Victims of Barter Fraud" was a coalition of purported victims of Merchants Barter Exchange. Here is a one of their free press releases: Merchants Of Barter Exchange Fraud To Meet With Ftc Investigators Of course they put out many more. Here is one of their "scam reports": Steve and Marti Bolles Merchants Barter Exchange Steve Bolles 800-822-7204 - merchantsbarter.com Looks familiar doesn't it?

So you created an entire fictional organization, that had supposedly been in operation for 17 years, with vast powers to investigate, license and arbitrate, phantom offices, and phantom staff to promote Merchants Barter Exchange and then to attack it, basically using free press releases!?

Well, sure enough the China Trade Commission's (i.e. Dimarco's) fax number 212-820-9746 was the same as that of Merchants Barter Exchange's. See CTC's Nov 07, 2009 free press releases here: China Trade Commission Opens Beijing Office

Of course you revised that document China Trade Commission Opens Beijing Office and deleted the fax number 212-820-9746 and "Last Updated" now reads: October 01, 2011. Now why would "you" do that? Looks like you're trying to hide something. There is a legal term for that, its called "consciousness of guilt." I know about legal terms. Well the original press release can be seen here:

That fax number appears here as well: 212-820-9746 free press release company directory.

China Trade Commission Information
Paul Zhang
Haidian District, Beijing
Phone: 86-10-82615180
URL: http://www.none.com
The CTC in a not for profit NGO established in 1996 in Hong Kong and New York to facilitate joint venture opportunities between Chinese and western businesses. No unsolicited business plans nor phone calls are accepted until a completed application is received. An application can be obtained by faxing your request on company letterhead to 212-820-9746.

This Merchants Barter Exchange free news release shows their fax number: MBE Successfully Completes Phase II of Beta Testing on Automated International Barter Software For Fortune 500 Companies

Authorized for immediate release by:
Henry Romano, Agent for
Merchants Barter Exchange
55 Madison Avenue
Morristown, NJ 07960
Tel: 212-572-6316
Merchants Barter Exchange Inc.
300 Park Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, N.Y. 10022 USA
Tel: (212) 572-6316 Fax: (212) 820-9746

Remember that Henry Romano is another one of your alias from the Tommy Roberts, et al v. Merchants Barter Exchange, et al. lawsuit.

So you worked for "Steve" and MBE and you are still trying to make him out to be the fall guy and going through great lengths to do it! When you started the China Trade Commission, you used the same fax number you used as a consultant of MBE. You created an entire company out of free press releases. Yeah, just like China Trade Commission, huh? Of wait, you do do children's shows, pose as Santa, host Halloween parties and play host to a magician but you don't know anything along the lines of due diligence. Maybe you have some cronies who do that for you, who knows.

Here's another interesting free press release:

Here is another one Allegations of Fraud, Identity Theft, and Lawsuits Spark 30-Day Investigation Is that you "Steve" and MBE are talking about? Are you still doing that nonsense. It sounds very serious, but you hold a grudge don't you? There are a lot of similarities. You worked for MBE and you spent all that time in Canada fighting extradition. The press release says you were wanted on an extradition warrant for taking bribes as an IRS agent but that's not accurate as you had already served time for that. However, you were facing extradition for charges stemming from wire and securities fraud. Of course, you, aka "Americans for Truth & Justice did release a a phoney press release exonerating yourself The Bruce Gorcyca Saga finally ends with dismissal of charges by Federal Judge Weinstein when of course new charges were brought were are still outstanding. Well, it's more to think about.

[Klaus]

I could not help but notice this ongoing feud, and rather that waste another 30 minutes responding, I found these comments at another post that basically sums up my observations as sentiments as well...

"Due Diligence is a devious but very creative guy. If someone disagrees with him they are either lying or a shill according to him. He always presents his own opinions as absolute facts, quotes things that were never said by other people in the thread, and transforms “Senior Members” into “Moderators”. Anyone who agrees with him, even on a minor point, gets praised for their vision and wisdom, and all who prove him wrong with links are simply ignored. He demands people accept his explanation without question, but ignores most of the key questions that people ask him. After 5 days of posting at WorldLawDirect.com he promotes himself from “Junior Member” to “Senior Member”. I’m sure if we look up up the word “malicious” in Webster’s dictionary we’d find his photo right next to the definition.


We all have opinions and all of them should be respected. Although I respect his opinion, I resent how this jerk tries to force feed us his ranting diatribe over and over again – and still cannot identify a single victim of the invisible and mysterious fraud he alleges. Give me a break! After changing his arguments six times in six weeks, he now suggests the “fraud” is the CTC membership fee. I did research and found out the membership has been closed for months! They are not even accepting new members! And if someone got ripped off for $5,000 they would surely be screaming about it all over the internet. There is not one such claim. Give us a break! This clown needs to get a life and stop trashing people he never even met or did any business with (according to his own admission). He pretends to know so much about the CTC Director but cannot tell us any of the following about:


1) Mr. DeMarco’s date of birth
2) Mr. DeMarco’s citizenship
3) Mr. DeMarco’s passport number
4) Mr. De Marco’s current address
5) The name of the jail where he claims Mr. DeMarco was released from
6) Any tattoos or scars on Mr. DeMarco
7) Make, model, and tag no. of car owned by Mr. DeMarco
8) Property currently owned by Mr. DeMarco
9) Banking information of Mr. DeMarco


And to be clear we are talking about Anthony S. DeMarco not any other DeMarco, DiMarco or anyone named “Bruce” in Ohio or anywhere else. His red herrings about other people and alleged crimes from 10 or 20 years ago are cute but do not have any relation to the China Trade Commission in China. People cannot be in three countries at the same time! First this idiot tells us DeMarco is in jail in America in 2008, after two witnesses say otherwise, he says DeMarco was “released” from jail (but can’t say which jail!), and after witnesses prove him wrong again, he says DeMarco is a fugitive. Again if you scroll down and read the below links you will see that witnesses prove him wrong again including the FBI, U.S. Marshals, Service, etc.

He also claimed DeMarco was listed on a “Black List” of the International Chamber of Commerce but the ICC published a notice on line that they have no such “Black List”!!!!!!
ICC-CCS refutes bogus blacklists.

More recently he said a “Moderator” at Scam.com said that 4 people that supported the CTC were posting from the same IP address. When we checked out his linked reference, we discover the “Moderator” in not a moderator but only a “Senior Member” (who would not ethically be allowed to have access to IP addresses). When all of the above are pointed out, he merely cut and pastes the photos of the real DeMarco from a 2002 CTC Newsletter (the photo with President Clinton) and links it to another DeMarco with the same name that has conviction for bribery in 1984. When he gets caught doing this, he says DeMarco’s real name is Bruce. Maybe if he told his last story first, he would have been believable, but he was caught is so many lies and changed his argument so many times, that he has now has zero credibility.

For anyone who prefer facts instead of opinions… I quote directly from a letter written by Las Vegas Magician Rasner who supports and corroborates exactly what Shanghai Susan, Scam Patrol, and Mr. Wilson have said about 3 or 4 weeks ago here in thin these links that proves the where the CTC Director is and has been since 2006. Pasting one guys name and criminal history on another person’s photo is insulting to our intelligence. This letter speaks for itself:

“To whom it may concern,

I am a professional magician who performs regularly in Las Vegas and at the Magic Castle in Los Angeles. I have been performing kids magic shows for the China Trade Commission every year since 2006, and every year have I personally met with Mr. Anthony DeMarco, Ying, and some of the other CTC events staff in China. They never once charged admission for any of the shows I did for Chinese kids.

I have always been paid on time for my services, and never had any problems with the CTC nor any of their staff. I have visited their offices near Peking University four or five times since 2009. I cannot recall how many people worked in those offices but it was surely more than thirty people when I was there last year. I also visited their office in Shanghai twice and the Hong Kong office one time in 2008 and 2006 respectively.

All of the CTC people I met appear to be very professional and well-educated people including maybe a dozen young university interns and maybe twice as many western people, mostly in their 40s and 50s.

Signed,
Rob Rasner
Magician”
www.RasnerMagic.com


You can see a copy of this actual letter at:
scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites and if you contact Bandit-Buster (at scam.com) you can get a copy of another letter from an Australian Exchange Student (David Foster) who worked as a CTC intern in 2007 who also confirms that DeMarco was in China for all of 2007 and this kid saw him on almost a daily basis in Shanghai. I only have a copy of the email but it says:


“I met Anthony DeMarco in Shanghai in late May of 2007, and he trained me and four other interns one hour every day for a month on basic due diligence procedures. I also received training from Stuart Davis and Zhang Wei Wang. We had weekly meetings during my entire year at the CTC, and usually Mr. DeMarco was present unless he was in Hong Kong or Beijing. I last saw him at the 2007 Spring Festival party because I finished my internship at the Hong Kong office before returning to Australia. The only complaint I ever heard was from a Canadian guy named Marvin who wanted a bigger discount because we did five reports from him and he did not opt for annual plan from the beginning and wanted to change after he realized he would have saved a lot of money”


Compare this information with this link: China Trade Commission Is Being Smeared and then this one: scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites


I am a person of average intelligence. I may not be a Harvard law graduate, a cop or private investigator, but it is not hard for me to see what is going here. For someone to be in jail from 2006 to 2008 as Due Diligence claims, he needs to prove a conviction, (a matter of public record) and it has to be for Anthony S. DeMarco and not another DeMarco or some alias that cannot be linked to the real Anthony S. DeMarco, because according to the court papers he refers to, the guy he falsely claims is DeMarco was clearly free on bail. And remember, the magician, Shnaghai Susan, Mr. Wilson, and Scam Patrol confirmed meeting with DeMarco in China during this same time period! And of course, don’t forget the snitch who dropped the dime on his former boss Due Diligence at the below links. And the girl who kept trying to stop the arguments (China Chick) comes across very credible to me as well at her three posts. Here is one of them:

Check the China Trade Commission Fraud Black List BEFORE Doing Overseas Biz

Too many people on three different forums seem to agree with me for all of us to be wrong, and I am nobody’s shill, nor a liar. And I sure as hell will never again believe any accusations I see on a blog or forum after seeing how this slander zealot trashed these people so badly online. He is very good at distracting people to the point of confusion and diverting people away from the most important fact of all – NOBODY HAS EVER CLAIMED TO BE A VICTIM OF THE CHINA TRADE COMMISSION IN ANY FRAUD OR SCAM. Here are the five key links that expose this jerk for what he really is

scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites
http://www.scam.com/showpost.php?p=1101922&postcount=106
scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites
scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites
scams - View Single Post - List of Scam Websites

[Due Diligence]

Hey "Klaus" aka Anthony DiMarco. Well that makes it easy doesn't it. Just "find" comments on another forum that fit your observations which is of course since you wrote them both! But I'll respond anyway:

Oh, there is nothing in the court papers about DiMarco being out on bail, read again. Even if he was out on bail, he'd still be a fugitive as he refused to return to face the charges and attempted to have them dismissed while he was in Canada. Read: Order Denying Dismissal, USA v. Bruce Anthony Gorcyca, aka "Anthony DiMarco," "Tony Dimarco," and "Tony D. Marco", filed in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York, Case No. 08-CR-9 (FB).

No, of course I don't know:

1) Mr. DeMarco’s date of birth 2) Mr. DeMarco’s citizenship 3) Mr. DeMarco’s passport number 4) Mr. De Marco’s current address 5) The name of the jail where he claims Mr. DeMarco was released from 6) Any tattoos or scars on Mr. DeMarco 7) Make, model, and tag no. of car owned by Mr. DeMarco 8) Property currently owned by Mr. DeMarco 9) Banking information of Mr. DeMarco

That's just stupid. I also don't know what toothpaste he uses and how many times he goes to the bathroom either, or what color his socks are, and I don't need to, to know that he's the person posing as the Executive Director of a phantom organization, the "China Trade Commission". I've compiled a great deal of evidence without knowing any of that. I'm sure that when he was arrested that the federal investigators didn't know that information either, its not relevant.

Oh, he was released from the Federal Detention center in New York City just like the court papers said.

You're mistaken, obviously I'm not interested in convincing you of anything! I haven't told you anything you don't know already and I certainly don't expect you to admit to anything. For others who might think that the China Trade Commission is real, read: 419 Advance Fee Fraud: Anthony Demarco / Dimarco / Gorcyca and the China Trade Commission Scam and make your own decision. I think it's very well documented.