AstraZeneca’s Psychiatric Drug Seroquel: Yet Another Qui Tam Grand Slam

This is a discussion on AstraZeneca’s Psychiatric Drug Seroquel: Yet Another Qui Tam Grand Slam within the Dangerous Drugs & Medical Devices forum, part of the Medical Malpractice category; No one likes a nark. But these days, the pharmaceutical industry, it seems, has more reason to fear them than ...

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Oct 30th, 2009, 10:30 AM   #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,438

Default AstraZeneca’s Psychiatric Drug Seroquel: Yet Another Qui Tam Grand Slam



No one likes a nark. But these days, the pharmaceutical industry, it seems, has more reason to fear them than most.

Earlier this year, Eli Lilly & Company paid $1.4 billion over its marketing of antipsychotic drug Zyprexa. And in September, Pfizer announced it would pay $2.3 billion to settle charges mostly related to its painkiller Bextra.

Now, it’s AstraZeneca’s turn. The company on Thursday announced that it had reached a $520 million agreement to settle two federal investigations and two whistle-blower lawsuits (also called qui tam suits) over the sale and marketing of its blockbuster psychiatric drug Seroquel. Click here for the WSJ story; here for the NYT story.

According to the NYT story, one of the investigations related to “selected physicians who participated in clinical trials involving Seroquel,” AstraZeneca disclosed in a government filing. The other case related to off-label promotion of the drug.

As a result of aggressive marketing, Seroquel has been increasingly used for children and elderly people for indications not approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

Tony Jewell, a company spokesman, declined unveil too many details to the Times about the physicians or clinical trials under investigation. He said the company was in final negotiations to settle the whistle-blower suits and reach a corporate integrity agreement with the Justice Department.

The name of the whistle-blowers and other details of the suits remained sealed in federal court. Stephen A. Sheller, a lawyer in Philadelphia for the whistle-blowers, and Patricia Hartman, a spokeswoman for the United States attorney in Philadelphia, both declined to comment.





WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31st, 2009, 11:35 AM   #2
Unregistered
Guest
 

Unregistered's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: AstraZeneca’s Psychiatric Drug Seroquel: Yet Another Qui Tam Grand Slam

There is way too much cooperation these days between the big-firm drug marketers and the doctors as far as I am concerned.

Utah Doc.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark & Share

This thread has 1 reply and has been viewed 133 times

« Propecia lawsuit? | - »
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

| More

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Format Your Messages
Add Forum to Google Toolbar
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NBA’s Chris Bosh Gets Legal Slam Dunk, Then Plays Team Ball WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Oct 14th, 2009 08:20 PM
legal rights and justification to held someone in a psychiatric ward Unregistered Miscellaneous Topics 1 Jan 31st, 2009 08:52 PM
legal extent of psychiatric hospitals hold on patient Unregistered Other Healthcare Law Issues 1 Aug 23rd, 2008 07:06 AM
grand mother needs answers for 4 grand kids Unregistered Other Family Law Matters 1 Apr 23rd, 2008 10:36 AM
Anti-Smoking Drug Linked to Psychiatric Risk FindLaw_blog Law News 1 Feb 18th, 2008 06:12 AM


International Law Issues?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:46 PM.