AstraZeneca’s Psychiatric Drug Seroquel: Yet Another Qui Tam Grand Slam
This is a discussion on AstraZeneca’s Psychiatric Drug Seroquel: Yet Another Qui Tam Grand Slam within the Dangerous Drugs & Medical Devices forum, part of the Medical Malpractice category; No one likes a nark. But these days, the pharmaceutical industry, it seems, has more reason to fear them than ...
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
News
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,438
|
![]() No one likes a nark. But these days, the pharmaceutical industry, it seems, has more reason to fear them than most. Earlier this year, Eli Lilly & Company paid $1.4 billion over its marketing of antipsychotic drug Zyprexa. And in September, Pfizer announced it would pay $2.3 billion to settle charges mostly related to its painkiller Bextra. Now, it’s AstraZeneca’s turn. The company on Thursday announced that it had reached a $520 million agreement to settle two federal investigations and two whistle-blower lawsuits (also called qui tam suits) over the sale and marketing of its blockbuster psychiatric drug Seroquel. Click here for the WSJ story; here for the NYT story. According to the NYT story, one of the investigations related to “selected physicians who participated in clinical trials involving Seroquel,” AstraZeneca disclosed in a government filing. The other case related to off-label promotion of the drug. As a result of aggressive marketing, Seroquel has been increasingly used for children and elderly people for indications not approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Tony Jewell, a company spokesman, declined unveil too many details to the Times about the physicians or clinical trials under investigation. He said the company was in final negotiations to settle the whistle-blower suits and reach a corporate integrity agreement with the Justice Department. The name of the whistle-blowers and other details of the suits remained sealed in federal court. Stephen A. Sheller, a lawyer in Philadelphia for the whistle-blowers, and Patricia Hartman, a spokeswoman for the United States attorney in Philadelphia, both declined to comment. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
There is way too much cooperation these days between the big-firm drug marketers and the doctors as far as I am concerned.
Utah Doc. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmark & Share |
This thread has 1 reply and has been viewed 133 times
«
Propecia lawsuit?
|
-
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NBA’s Chris Bosh Gets Legal Slam Dunk, Then Plays Team Ball | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 0 | Oct 14th, 2009 08:20 PM |
| legal rights and justification to held someone in a psychiatric ward | Unregistered | Miscellaneous Topics | 1 | Jan 31st, 2009 08:52 PM |
| legal extent of psychiatric hospitals hold on patient | Unregistered | Other Healthcare Law Issues | 1 | Aug 23rd, 2008 07:06 AM |
| grand mother needs answers for 4 grand kids | Unregistered | Other Family Law Matters | 1 | Apr 23rd, 2008 10:36 AM |
| Anti-Smoking Drug Linked to Psychiatric Risk | FindLaw_blog | Law News | 1 | Feb 18th, 2008 06:12 AM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:46 PM.









Linear Mode


