Drugmakers Breathe Easier After Ruling in Warning Case
This is a discussion on Drugmakers Breathe Easier After Ruling in Warning Case within the Dangerous Drugs & Medical Devices forum, part of the Medical Malpractice category; In 2003, Lois Colacicco, a psychotherapist who counseled patients against suicide, began taking a generic version of Paxil, an antidepressant ...
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
News
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,438
|
![]() In 2003, Lois Colacicco, a psychotherapist who counseled patients against suicide, began taking a generic version of Paxil, an antidepressant marketed by GlaxoSmithKline. Later that year, Colaccio killed herself. In the same year, Theodore DeAngelis committed suicide eight days after beginning to take Pfizer’s Zoloft, another antidepressant. Yesterday, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the drugmakers could not be blamed for the suicides of Colacicco and DeAngelis, whose families claimed that the drug’s warning labels were not strong enough. (Here’s the opinion, and here’s a story from the Philadelphia Inquirer.) While narrowly written, according to the report, the decision was a victory for drugmakers and Bush administration officials who want scientists at the FDA, not lay juries, deciding what drug labels should say. “The drug companies get a free ride here,” lamented Sol Weiss, a Philadelphia lawyer who represented one of the plaintiffs. “They interpret data in a way that’s not scientifically valid. The FDA may not ever know that, and so the drug companies get away with it for six, seven or eight years. People get injured and die because of it. You should have the right at least to expose this stuff to sunshine.” Rob Weiner, a partner at Arnold & Porter, disagrees. “Pharmaceutical companies are caught in this situation where they need to follow FDA’s instructions,” said Weiner, who wrote an amicus brief in the case for a drug-industry lobbying organization. “They also need to worry about state courts’ telling them to do something else.” The issue could come to a head in October, when the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear Wyeth v. Levine, another dispute over the adequacy of a drug label. Last edited by top_admin; Jun 9th, 2008 at 11:11 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1
|
I have been taking Zoloft(Pfizer) since1998,for the first time in my entire life,I was happy. In 2006,the pharmacy switched me to Sertraline(generic) telling me it was the same thing as Zoloft. After the first week,I thought my moods, were my body getting used to the generic. I continued taking it for six months,to give it a fair chance, meanwhile others noticed my irritability,crankiness,dark moods,and general anger, at the world. I knew it was the generic, when I threw a kitten against my fireplace.
I told my doctor and he wrote "ZOLOFT" Pfizer - medically neccesary. It took a few weeks until I started to feel good again after taking the Pfizer again, since 2007. Recently,I have been feeling depressed,and am noticing the darkness again,this time I am having anxiety attacks, palpatations, and hyperventalation, so I looked at the bottle and saw that I have been taking Zoloft (Roe),same dosage as the Pfizer, 200mgs per day. I really feel that messing with something that works so well should be left alone,there is a difference between generics, and the original. I do not want to go back to being a person that kills small animals. I |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmark & Share |
This thread has 1 reply and has been viewed 802 times
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Canada's bankruptcy new rules make it easier to avoid a filing | Unregistered | Consumer Bankruptcy | 0 | Sep 21st, 2009 02:58 PM |
| Civil court ruling in a landlord/tenant case | Unregistered | Other Real Estate Law Matters | 2 | Jul 28th, 2009 09:05 PM |
| Warning | Unregistered | Medical Malpractice | 0 | Mar 27th, 2009 05:48 AM |
| Ruling in Veoh Case Could Mean Blue Skies Ahead for YouTube | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 0 | Aug 28th, 2008 10:20 AM |
| verbal warning and paperwork | Unregistered | Hiring, Firing, Wrongful Termination | 0 | Jan 23rd, 2008 06:00 PM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:35 PM.









Linear Mode


