Drugmakers Breathe Easier After Ruling in Warning Case

This is a discussion on Drugmakers Breathe Easier After Ruling in Warning Case within the Dangerous Drugs & Medical Devices forum, part of the Medical Malpractice category; In 2003, Lois Colacicco, a psychotherapist who counseled patients against suicide, began taking a generic version of Paxil, an antidepressant ...

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Apr 9th, 2008, 09:40 AM   #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,438

Default Drugmakers Breathe Easier After Ruling in Warning Case



In 2003, Lois Colacicco, a psychotherapist who counseled patients against suicide, began taking a generic version of Paxil, an antidepressant marketed by GlaxoSmithKline. Later that year, Colaccio killed herself. In the same year, Theodore DeAngelis committed suicide eight days after beginning to take Pfizer’s Zoloft, another antidepressant.

Yesterday, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the drugmakers could not be blamed for the suicides of Colacicco and DeAngelis, whose families claimed that the drug’s warning labels were not strong enough. (Here’s the opinion, and here’s a story from the Philadelphia Inquirer.) While narrowly written, according to the report, the decision was a victory for drugmakers and Bush administration officials who want scientists at the FDA, not lay juries, deciding what drug labels should say.

“The drug companies get a free ride here,” lamented Sol Weiss, a Philadelphia lawyer who represented one of the plaintiffs. “They interpret data in a way that’s not scientifically valid. The FDA may not ever know that, and so the drug companies get away with it for six, seven or eight years. People get injured and die because of it. You should have the right at least to expose this stuff to sunshine.”

Rob Weiner, a partner at Arnold & Porter, disagrees. “Pharmaceutical companies are caught in this situation where they need to follow FDA’s instructions,” said Weiner, who wrote an amicus brief in the case for a drug-industry lobbying organization. “They also need to worry about state courts’ telling them to do something else.”

The issue could come to a head in October, when the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear Wyeth v. Levine, another dispute over the adequacy of a drug label.

Last edited by top_admin; Jun 9th, 2008 at 11:11 AM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 29th, 2009, 10:02 AM   #2
Junior Member
 

glgluna13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1

Exclamation Re: Drugmakers Breathe Easier After Ruling in Warning Case

I have been taking Zoloft(Pfizer) since1998,for the first time in my entire life,I was happy. In 2006,the pharmacy switched me to Sertraline(generic) telling me it was the same thing as Zoloft. After the first week,I thought my moods, were my body getting used to the generic. I continued taking it for six months,to give it a fair chance, meanwhile others noticed my irritability,crankiness,dark moods,and general anger, at the world. I knew it was the generic, when I threw a kitten against my fireplace.
I told my doctor and he wrote "ZOLOFT" Pfizer - medically neccesary. It took a few weeks until I started to feel good again after taking the Pfizer again, since 2007.
Recently,I have been feeling depressed,and am noticing the darkness again,this time I am having anxiety attacks, palpatations, and hyperventalation, so I looked at the bottle and saw that I have been taking Zoloft (Roe),same dosage as the Pfizer, 200mgs per day.
I really feel that messing with something that works so well should be left alone,there is a difference between generics, and the original. I do not want to go back to being a person that kills small animals.
I
glgluna13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark & Share

This thread has 1 reply and has been viewed 802 times

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

| More

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Format Your Messages
Add Forum to Google Toolbar
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Canada's bankruptcy new rules make it easier to avoid a filing Unregistered Consumer Bankruptcy 0 Sep 21st, 2009 02:58 PM
Civil court ruling in a landlord/tenant case Unregistered Other Real Estate Law Matters 2 Jul 28th, 2009 09:05 PM
Warning Unregistered Medical Malpractice 0 Mar 27th, 2009 05:48 AM
Ruling in Veoh Case Could Mean Blue Skies Ahead for YouTube WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Aug 28th, 2008 10:20 AM
verbal warning and paperwork Unregistered Hiring, Firing, Wrongful Termination 0 Jan 23rd, 2008 06:00 PM


International Law Issues?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:35 PM.