WORLD Law Direct Forums
Home > WORLD Law Direct Forums > CRIMINAL LAW, ARRESTS, TRAFFIC TICKETS > Other Criminal Law Matters > 2009 Minnesota Statutes: 1st Degree - Described as sexual penetration

2009 Minnesota Statutes: 1st Degree - Described as sexual penetration

This is a discussion on 2009 Minnesota Statutes: 1st Degree - Described as sexual penetration within the Other Criminal Law Matters forum, part of the CRIMINAL LAW, ARRESTS, TRAFFIC TICKETS category; 1st Degree – Most severe charges. Minnesota 1st degree criminal sexual conduct charges are described as sexual penetration as well ...

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Sep 20th, 2009, 08:38 PM   #1
Unregistered
Guest
 

Unregistered's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a

Default 2009 Minnesota Statutes: 1st Degree - Described as sexual penetration

1st Degree – Most severe charges. Minnesota 1st degree criminal sexual conduct charges are described as sexual penetration as well as certain sexual contact with a victim under 13 years old. First degree criminal sexual conduct charges are also brought against a person if force was used, violence, the use of a dangerous weapon, and if injury was caused to the person.


609.342 CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONDUCT IN THE FIRST DEGREE.
Subdivision 1.Crime defined.

A person who engages in sexual penetration with another person, or in sexual contact with a person under 13 years of age as defined in section 609.341, subdivision 11, paragraph (c), is guilty of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree if any of the following circumstances exists:

(a) the complainant is under 13 years of age and the actor is more than 36 months older than the complainant. Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by the complainant is a defense;

(b) the complainant is at least 13 years of age but less than 16 years of age and the actor is more than 48 months older than the complainant and in a position of authority over the complainant. Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by the complainant is a defense;

(c) circumstances existing at the time of the act cause the complainant to have a reasonable fear of imminent great bodily harm to the complainant or another;

(d) the actor is armed with a dangerous weapon or any article used or fashioned in a manner to lead the complainant to reasonably believe it to be a dangerous weapon and uses or threatens to use the weapon or article to cause the complainant to submit;

(e) the actor causes personal injury to the complainant, and either of the following circumstances exist:

(i) the actor uses force or coercion to accomplish sexual penetration; or

(ii) the actor knows or has reason to know that the complainant is mentally impaired, mentally incapacitated, or physically helpless;

(f) the actor is aided or abetted by one or more accomplices within the meaning of section 609.05, and either of the following circumstances exists:

(i) an accomplice uses force or coercion to cause the complainant to submit; or

(ii) an accomplice is armed with a dangerous weapon or any article used or fashioned in a manner to lead the complainant reasonably to believe it to be a dangerous weapon and uses or threatens to use the weapon or article to cause the complainant to submit;

(g) the actor has a significant relationship to the complainant and the complainant was under 16 years of age at the time of the sexual penetration. Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by the complainant is a defense; or

(h) the actor has a significant relationship to the complainant, the complainant was under 16 years of age at the time of the sexual penetration, and:

(i) the actor or an accomplice used force or coercion to accomplish the penetration;

(ii) the complainant suffered personal injury; or

(iii) the sexual abuse involved multiple acts committed over an extended period of time.

Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by the complainant is a defense.
Subd. 2.Penalty.

(a) Except as otherwise provided in section 609.3455; or Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 609.109, a person convicted under subdivision 1 may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 30 years or to a payment of a fine of not more than $40,000, or both.

(b) Unless a longer mandatory minimum sentence is otherwise required by law or the Sentencing Guidelines provide for a longer presumptive executed sentence, the court shall presume that an executed sentence of 144 months must be imposed on an offender convicted of violating this section. Sentencing a person in a manner other than that described in this paragraph is a departure from the Sentencing Guidelines.

(c) A person convicted under this section is also subject to conditional release under section 609.3455.
Subd. 3.Stay.

Except when imprisonment is required under section 609.3455; or Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 609.109, if a person is convicted under subdivision 1, clause (g), the court may stay imposition or execution of the sentence if it finds that:

(a) a stay is in the best interest of the complainant or the family unit; and

(b) a professional assessment indicates that the offender has been accepted by and can respond to a treatment program.

If the court stays imposition or execution of sentence, it shall include the following as conditions of probation:

(1) incarceration in a local jail or workhouse;

(2) a requirement that the offender complete a treatment program; and

(3) a requirement that the offender have no unsupervised contact with the complainant until the offender has successfully completed the treatment program unless approved by the treatment program and the supervising correctional agent.

History:

1975 c 374 s 3; 1981 c 51 s 2; 1983 c 204 s 1; 1984 c 628 art 3 s 11; 1985 c 24 s 5; 1985 c 286 s 15; 1986 c 444; 1989 c 290 art 4 s 12; 1992 c 571 art 1 s 14; 1994 c 636 art 2 s 34; 1995 c 186 s 99; 1998 c 367 art 3 s 7; art 6 s 15; 2000 c 311 art 4 s 2; 2000 c 437 s 10; 2005 c 136 art 2 s 12,13; 2007 c 13 art 3 s 37
  Reply With Quote
Old Sep 21st, 2009, 10:37 AM   #2
Unregistered
Guest
 

Unregistered's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 2009 Minnesota Statutes: 1st Degree - Described as sexual penetration

Thanks--that is the exact statute I was referring to!

Johnn B
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark & Share

Tags
None

This thread has 1 reply and has been viewed 131 times

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

| More

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Format Your Messages
Add Forum to Google Toolbar
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2009 Minnesota Statutes: 2nd Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct Charges Unregistered Other Criminal Law Matters 0 Sep 20th, 2009 08:40 PM
2009 Minnesota Statutes: 4th Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct Charges Unregistered Other Criminal Law Matters 0 Sep 20th, 2009 08:36 PM
2009 Minnesota Statutes: 5th Degree – Described as sexual contact Unregistered Other Criminal Law Matters 0 Sep 20th, 2009 08:34 PM
2009 Minnesota Statutes: 3rd Degree – Described as sexual penetration Unregistered Other Criminal Law Matters 0 Sep 20th, 2009 08:26 PM
Theft in 1st degree Unregistered Other Criminal Law Matters 1 Oct 31st, 2008 03:11 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59 AM.