WORLD Law Direct Forums
Home > WORLD Law Direct Forums > FORUM INFORMATION > Law News > Crimes and Trials News > Alabama county's lawsuit: Judge raises questions about Voting Rights Act

Alabama county's lawsuit: Judge raises questions about Voting Rights Act

This is a discussion on Alabama county's lawsuit: Judge raises questions about Voting Rights Act within the Crimes and Trials News forum, part of the Law News category; AP - A federal judge is questioning whether a key component of the landmark Voting Rights Act is outdated. More......

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply  POST NEW QUESTION

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Feb 2nd, 2011, 03:00 PM   #1
News Feed by Yahoo!
 
Yahoo! News's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,034

Default Alabama county's lawsuit: Judge raises questions about Voting Rights Act

AP - A federal judge is questioning whether a key component of the landmark Voting Rights Act is outdated.

More...
Yahoo! News is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 2nd, 2011, 04:40 PM   #2
Forum Administrator
 
forum_admin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,782

Default re: Alabama county's lawsuit: Judge raises questions about Voting Rights Act

A federal judge on Wednesday questioned whether a key component of the landmark Voting Rights Act is outdated, expressing skepticism about using evidence of racial discrimination from 40 or 50 years ago to justify continued election monitoring for a group of mostly Southern states.

U.S. District Judge John Bates' comments came during oral arguments in an Alabama county's lawsuit targeting the law — a constitutional challenge that a number of legal observers predict could well reach the Supreme Court.

Shelby County, backed by conservative legal groups, maintains that it and other covered state, county and local governments should no longer be forced to get federal approval before changing even minor election procedures. They note that the Voting Rights Act — enacted in 1965 and extended by Congress for another 25 years in 2006 — relies heavily on past discrimination in determining which jurisdictions are covered by the "pre-clearance" requirement for election changes such as moving a polling place or redrawing school district lines.
__________________

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now! Click Here
Find Legal Forms for All 50 States
forum_admin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark & Share

This thread has 1 reply and has been viewed 385 times

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Format Your Messages
Add Forum to Google Toolbar
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Alabama County Continues Fight Over Voting Rights Act WSJ Law Blog Law News 0 Nov 3rd, 2011 12:40 PM
Judge Dismisses Alabama County’s Challenge to Federal Voting Law WSJ Law Blog Law News 0 Sep 21st, 2011 04:50 PM
Arizona Locks Horns (Again) with Federal Government (Voting Rights Act) WSJ Law Blog Law News 0 Aug 26th, 2011 09:50 AM
A Controversial Part of the Voting Rights Act Gets Another Close Look WSJ Law Blog Law News 0 Feb 2nd, 2011 07:50 PM
Civil rights violation if a judge *oks* a fraudulent act committed by one person Unregistered Courts, Decisions, Appeals 2 Sep 24th, 2009 01:37 PM


Forming an off-shore company? We can assist you in forming your company in 40 countries worldwide.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 AM.