The New U.K. High Court: A Chip Off The New Block

This is a discussion on The New U.K. High Court: A Chip Off The New Block within the Courts, Decisions, Appeals forum, part of the Civil Litigation category; Chalk one up for American legal exceptionalism. The United Kingdom has rolled out a newly designed high court and it ...

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Oct 19th, 2009, 04:40 PM   #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,438

Default The New U.K. High Court: A Chip Off The New Block



Chalk one up for American legal exceptionalism.

The United Kingdom has rolled out a newly designed high court and it samples a few notes from our very own high court. Go, SCOTUS!

Here’s a page-one story over the weekend from WSJ.

The U.K. this month replaced its Law Lords ─ a committee of noblemen that served as the highest tribunal for much of Britain ─ with the new “Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.” Beyond the name similarities, the new U.K. court is fully separated, American-style, from Parliament and its legal function.

On Friday, SCOTUS halted court while Roberts, Scalia and Breyer traipsed across the pond to attend the court’s opening, where the justices hobnobbed with Queen Elizabeth. (Justice Ginsburg was also due to attend, but she was removed from a London-bound flight after an adverse reaction to a sleeping aid. She soon recovered.)

For the occasion, the 11 judges on the U.K Supreme Court (“SCOTUK”?) shed their old red robes and wigs ─ the “Father Christmas outfit,” as one judge told WSJ ─ in favor of new black robes, embellished with gold lace and thread (shown here, courtesy of the Associated Press.)

In short, the new court is meant to be a modern upgrade, with a simpler structure and easier access for the public.

“Over 200 years or more of [U.S.] Supreme Court history, the cases are filled with references that show our law is based on English law,” Justice Breyer said. “They are perhaps taking a leaf from our book.”

Lest we get too excited, though, the U.K. court will remain distinct. The court, for example, does not have the power to strike down legislation, as do our high benchers.

Still, folks across the pond are concerned that their newly designed court will bump up against legislators ─ “an accusation frequently made in the U.S. when courts wade into issues like abortion,” WSJ writes.

The head of the new court downplays the concern. “I don’t think we’ll get too big for our boots,” says Lord Phillips.

LB Extra:
Also, in this clip, the queen greets Roberts, Alito and Breyer.





WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark & Share



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

| More

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Format Your Messages
Add Forum to Google Toolbar
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Report from the High Court: The Calm Before the Storm WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Sep 8th, 2009 04:20 PM
Mexico’s High Court Says Yes to Abortion WSJ_law_blog International Law News 0 Aug 28th, 2008 02:20 PM
Chip-Maker Rambus Wins Reversal in Antitrust Case WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Apr 22nd, 2008 07:50 PM
High Court Upholds Kentucky WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Apr 16th, 2008 12:11 PM
High Court Order - Property Unregistered Debt Collection 1 Oct 20th, 2007 09:39 AM


Top crime attorneys


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 AM.