A Look Back at Judge Kozinski

This is a discussion on A Look Back at Judge Kozinski within the Courts, Decisions, Appeals forum, part of the Civil Litigation category; Earlier today the L.A. Times reported that Judge Alex Kozinski posted sexually explicit material to a personal Web site. (See ...

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Jun 11th, 2008, 07:40 PM   #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,438

Default A Look Back at Judge Kozinski



Earlier today the L.A. Times reported that Judge Alex Kozinski posted sexually explicit material to a personal Web site. (See this post.) The article said the site was not maintained on work computers.

Judge Kozinski does have some views on government monitoring of federal court employees’ computers. In a brouhaha over the issue seven years ago, the Administrative Office of the federal courts attempted to install a system that monitored the computers of all federal court workers. The move met vigorous opposition from the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, including Judge Kozinski. (See this NYT article.)

He argued that the monitoring was a violation of an anti-wiretap statute. Here’s an open letter to federal judges that Kozinski wrote at the time.

The Federal Judges Association, a group that represents about 85 percent of the nation’s 1,800 federal judges, voted to adopt a resolution opposing the monitoring program, according to a NYT article then.

Under this pressure, the NYT reported, head of the Administrative Office, Ralph Mecham, dropped the monitoring program, but not without stirring the pot with Kozinski. Mecham told the NYT that Kozinski was ”advocating his passionate views that judges are free, undetected, to download pornography and Napster music on government computers in federal court buildings on government time even though some of the downloading may constitute felonies.” He also said Judge Kozinski had shown ”great interest in keeping pornography available to judges.”

Judge Kozinski said ”I don’t think we need bureaucrats in Washington looking over our shoulders for this kind of thing.” Others criticized Mecham’s comments as inappropriate.

Wednesday, a court spokeswoman, Cathy Catterson, said: “Clearly back in 2001, it was for the principle of the issue. It was talking about the court’s computers. This is a totally separate thing. The computer was a family computer, maintained at home by one of his sons. It was not the property of the government. All the family uses it.”

Last edited by top_admin; Jun 11th, 2008 at 08:31 PM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark & Share



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

| More

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Format Your Messages
Add Forum to Google Toolbar
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Judge: New bottle law back on tap forum_admin Courts, Decisions, Appeals 0 Aug 16th, 2009 01:02 AM
Judge Manuel Real: Back on the Hot Seat Again WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Apr 2nd, 2009 03:50 PM
Bankruptcy judge orders victim to pay back thief (AP) Yahoo!_news Crimes and Trials News 0 Sep 22nd, 2008 12:20 PM
Kozinski: L.A. Times Edit Says ‘So What?’ Kozinski on Judging Judges WSJ_law_blog Attorneys & Legal Ethics 0 Jun 13th, 2008 12:30 PM
Kozinski Calls for Investigation of Himself WSJ_law_blog Attorneys & Legal Ethics 0 Jun 12th, 2008 08:10 PM


Top crime attorneys


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:47 PM.