WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Attorneys, Courts, Litigation > Civil Litigation > Courts, Decisions, Appeals
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Courts, Decisions, Appeals Issues concerning a specific court or adjudication system, arbitration, etc.

A Look Back at Judge Kozinski

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 06-11-2008, 07:40 PM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
07-16-2008 11:37 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 549

Default A Look Back at Judge Kozinski



Earlier today the L.A. Times reported that Judge Alex Kozinski posted sexually explicit material to a personal Web site. (See this post.) The article said the site was not maintained on work computers.

Judge Kozinski does have some views on government monitoring of federal court employees’ computers. In a brouhaha over the issue seven years ago, the Administrative Office of the federal courts attempted to install a system that monitored the computers of all federal court workers. The move met vigorous opposition from the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, including Judge Kozinski. (See this NYT article.)

He argued that the monitoring was a violation of an anti-wiretap statute. Here’s an open letter to federal judges that Kozinski wrote at the time.

The Federal Judges Association, a group that represents about 85 percent of the nation’s 1,800 federal judges, voted to adopt a resolution opposing the monitoring program, according to a NYT article then.

Under this pressure, the NYT reported, head of the Administrative Office, Ralph Mecham, dropped the monitoring program, but not without stirring the pot with Kozinski. Mecham told the NYT that Kozinski was ”advocating his passionate views that judges are free, undetected, to download pornography and Napster music on government computers in federal court buildings on government time even though some of the downloading may constitute felonies.” He also said Judge Kozinski had shown ”great interest in keeping pornography available to judges.”

Judge Kozinski said ”I don’t think we need bureaucrats in Washington looking over our shoulders for this kind of thing.” Others criticized Mecham’s comments as inappropriate.

Wednesday, a court spokeswoman, Cathy Catterson, said: “Clearly back in 2001, it was for the principle of the issue. It was talking about the court’s computers. This is a totally separate thing. The computer was a family computer, maintained at home by one of his sons. It was not the property of the government. All the family uses it.”

Last edited by top_admin : 06-11-2008 at 08:31 PM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bankruptcy judge orders victim to pay back thief (AP) Yahoo!_news Crimes and Trials News 0 09-22-2008 12:20 PM
Judge Dresses Down Inmates, Then Dresses Them Back Up WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 09-11-2008 02:20 PM
As Emails Show, Ribald Sense of Humor Is Signature Kozinski WSJ_law_blog Attorneys & Legal Ethics 0 06-13-2008 08:50 PM
Kozinski: L.A. Times Edit Says ‘So What?’ Kozinski on Judging Judges WSJ_law_blog Attorneys & Legal Ethics 0 06-13-2008 12:30 PM
Kozinski Calls for Investigation of Himself WSJ_law_blog Attorneys & Legal Ethics 0 06-12-2008 08:10 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:04 PM.


Top crime attorneys

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2008 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.