WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Attorneys, Courts, Litigation > Civil Litigation > Courts, Decisions, Appeals
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Courts, Decisions, Appeals Issues concerning a specific court or adjudication system, arbitration, etc.

California Judge Taking Heat For Her Rulings, Courtroom Conduct

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 06-02-2008, 10:50 AM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
07-16-2008 11:37 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 549

Default California Judge Taking Heat For Her Rulings, Courtroom Conduct



Joyce Allegro (pictured), a judge in the Santa Clara County Superior Court, is getting a lot of unwanted attention over her handling of cases.

In the latest example, courtesy of the Mercury News, the 6th District Court of Appeals last month overturned the conviction of Salee Amina Barnes-Mohammed, an investment advisor from Beverly Hills, on charges of failing to appear in court.

In a published opinion, the appellate judges wrote that Allegro effectively ignored state law by not dismissing the charge.

By dismissing Mohammed’s conviction on the grounds of insufficient evidence, the appeals court avoided addressing the defendant’s numerous other complaints about the case, which became contentious as the judge sparred openly with the defendant during the nine-day trial in 2006.

It turns out the Mercury News did a feature in 2006 on “prosecutors-turned-judges who engaged in questionable behavior,” citing Allegro as one such example. The piece cites another reversal of a conviction that occurred on Allegro’s watch, this one being manslaughter. Judges handling the appeal said her rulings, including blocking a defense expert from testifying, during trial “serious prejudiced” the defendant, writes the Mercury News. In an interview, Allegro said defense attorneys were wrong all along in their belief that she couldn’t be fair in certain types of cases because of her background.

In the Mohammed case, Judge Allegro told the defendant, who represented herself for most of the trial, to “be quiet” more than 50 times and called her “completely rude.” The judge said, at one point: “Do you want to be physically gagged? I can do that if I have to and will if I have to.”

Here’s one particularly nasty exchange, from page 20 of the defendant’s appellate brief:

“Ms. Mohammed: Your Honor, may I pose a request to the court that I be allowed time to provide the information which I have prepared but (sic) not with me today that will counter the lies that are in that discovery material?

The Court: You are going to have to stop making statements like “lies”. I’m not going to allow that, ma’am. I’m not going to allow that at all –

Ms. Mohammed: Your Honor nearly everything I say is a prevarication and I’d like to corroborate, Your Honor –

The Court: You’re not going to call names in this courtroom.

Ms. Mohammed: Well, Your Honor, ma’am, with all due respect –

The Court: Ms. Mohammed, I’m going to have you taken – held in the holding cell if you can’t behave yourself. You don’t talk when I’m talking.”

Last edited by top_admin : 06-02-2008 at 10:56 AM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Heat Gets Turned up on Immigration Firm WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 09-05-2008 03:11 PM
Can’t Keep Her Outta the Courtroom! Sandra Day Authors 1st Cir. Opinion WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 07-10-2008 12:30 PM
California heat laws to prevent over-heating Unregistered Injury & Worker's Compensation 0 07-06-2008 05:49 PM
Scruggs Gets 5 Years in Prison; Judge Calls Conduct “Reprehensible” WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 06-27-2008 12:30 PM
For Women Litigators: A Courtroom Footwear Dilemma? WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 05-22-2008 10:40 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 PM.


Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2008 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.