WORLD Law Direct Forums  



Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Accidents, Personal Injury, Insurance > Class Actions & Defective Products
REGISTER FAQ Calendar SEARCH Today's Posts MARK FORUMS READ
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Forum Archive

Class Actions & Defective Products Class actions, product liability torts, including defective design, inadequate warnings, etc.

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button AddThis Social Bookmark Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 06-02-2008, 08:00 PM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
07-16-2008 12:37 PM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 361
Default Brocade Pays $160 Million to Settle Options-Backdating Suit



This just in: Brocade Communications has agreed to pay $160 million to plaintiffs to settle a federal securities class-action lawsuit related to stock-options backdating. Here’s the story, from the WSJ’s Mark Maremont and John Hechinger, as well as Brocade’s link press release.

The case was filed in May 2005 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Under terms of the preliminary settlement, Brocade will pay $160 million to the plaintiff class in exchange for dismissal of all claims. The settlement requires approval of the federal district court.

Of the dozens of companies that got wrapped up in the stock-options backdating scandal, Brocade was among the hardest hit. Last August, former Brocade Chief Executive Gregory Reyes (pictured) was found guilty on criminal charges related to backdating. He was accused of defrauding shareholders between 2000 and 2004 by routinely altering the grant dates of stock options awarded to recruit and retain employees and of falsifying documents to cover up the scheme. In January, he was sentenced to 21 months in prison. In December, a jury convicted former Brocade human-resources director Stephanie Jensen on other charges related to backdating. In March, she was sentenced to four months in prison.

In the civil class-action lawsuit, Brocade last month suffered a setback when a federal judge in San Francisco ruled that the company was financially liable for Reyes’s conduct, following an earlier summary judgment ruling that Mr. Reyes himself was at fault in the civil matter.

After that, said Brad Beckworth, the lead plaintiffs’ attorney in the case at Nix, Patterson & Roach, “the only issue we were going to have to try was how much money Brocade was going to have to pay. The company knew it was time to resolve this case.”

Few of the roughly 30 class-action suits involving backdating have been settled. In October, Hewlett-Packard agreed to a $117.5 million settlement of a class-action suit tied to allegations of stock-options backdating at software maker Mercury Interactive Corp., which was acquired by H-P.

Most of the shareholder lawsuits over backdating have been so-called derivative suits, in which shareholders sue third parties on behalf of a company. The bulk of these have yielded relatively small sums.

Photo: AP

Last edited by top_admin : 06-11-2008 at 09:36 PM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Options Grant to Dead Exec Leads to $34.4 Million Settlement WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 06-05-2008 01:40 PM
SEC Accuses Former Pixar CFO of Backdating WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 04-29-2008 10:00 AM
Who Pays For Trees Unregistered Landlord vs Tenant Issues 1 12-04-2007 01:35 PM
Who pays court costs? Unregistered Other Family Law Matters 1 01-13-2007 02:57 PM
government pays Oregon lawyer $2 million for false arrest Unregistered Arrests, Searches, Seizures 1 11-30-2006 12:17 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:11 PM.


Top crime attorneys

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct. Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2008 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.