WORLD Law Direct Forums  



Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Accidents, Personal Injury, Insurance > Class Actions & Defective Products
REGISTER Legal Forms FAQ Calendar SEARCH Today's Posts MARK FORUMS READ

Class Actions & Defective Products Class actions, product liability torts, including defective design, inadequate warnings, etc.

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button AddThis Social Bookmark Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 04-30-2008, 06:50 PM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
03-11-2008 02:01 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 242
Default Weinstein Reversed Again, This Time in NYC



Brooklyn federal district Judge Jack Weinstein (pictured) is known for getting assigned huge class actions with billions at stake. He’s also known for getting reversed by his colleagues on the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. In the latter respect, the month of April has been a doozie. On April 3, the Second Circuit reversed Weinstein in the so-called light cigarette litigation, decertifying a class of 50 million plaintiffs.

And today, the court tossed out New York City’s lawsuit accusing the gun industry of selling firearms with the knowledge they can be diverted into illegal markets. Here’s the early report from the AP, here’s the opinion.

The crux of the suit, which dates back to 2000: The city of New York sued the gun industry — including Beretta, Browning, Colt, Glock Inc. and a bunch of others — for facilitating “the movement of legally distributed handguns into illegal markets” by, among other things, facilitating “straw purchases” in which those qualified to purchase guns from the manufacturer, such as retailers, make purchases on behalf of those who aren’t qualified.

Back in 2005, Weinstein denied the manufacturers’ 12(b)(6) motion, holding that the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, did not require dismissal of the city’s case, which was brought under a New York criminal nuisance statute. In a 2-1 decision, a Second Circuit panel reversed, finding that the claim restrictions of the PLCAA did apply and barred the suit.

“I am disappointed in the court’s decision,” said Mayor Michael Bloomberg. “Regardless of this ruling, we will continue our fight against illegal guns full bore — in the courtrooms, on the streets and in the Congress.”

City Corporation Counsel Michael Cardozo, the lead plaintiff lawyer, said his office “is analyzing the decision” before deciding whether to appeal.

Representing the gun manufacturers were, among others, lawyers from Jones Day, Hoffberger & Hollander, Bosick & Gordon, Greenberg Traurig and Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon.

Last edited by top_admin : 05-02-2008 at 07:47 AM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RECKLESS DRIVING IN NYC Unregistered Traffic & Speeding Tickets 1 04-04-2008 07:08 PM
NYC DMV Adjudication Board is not unbeatable Unregistered Traffic & Speeding Tickets 2 01-03-2008 09:59 AM
What if the Supreme Court reversed Roe v. Wade? Unregistered Other Criminal Law Matters 3 12-17-2007 01:37 PM
Can a Plea Bargain be Reversed? LaurenPop Trials & Sentencing 1 03-22-2007 10:26 AM
is drive time over time Unregistered Salary & Workers Compensation 1 01-28-2007 01:27 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 PM.


Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct. Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2008 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.