Corruption in the courts?

[bostonteatruth]

The editor of the book, Boston Tea Party Book, Michael Scott Ioane has been ordered by Magistrate Judge Snyder of Fresno, CA to remove his name from the site: Boston Tea Party Book.

NOT because he isn't, in fact, the editor, but because the name links to another site about his business services. The order, given through pre-trial services, is that since it links to another site, he may be giving the impression of providing tax advice.

What?? Are web site owners responsible for claims of service made on sites we link to now?

Anyone know of the legality of this kind of thing? Or is it just another knee-jerk reaction to the Boston Tea Party demonstrations coming up?


www.truthinlaw.org

It would seem that that could be challenged quite easily if it is as you describe here.

You'd be amazed at the California court system. They're out of control.

Well, posting the truth has greatly upset the Judge in this matter. Her name being Judge Snyder of Fresno, California. Concerning the apparent denial of Mr. Ioane's Fourth Amendment rights and his resulting arrest he appeared again before the court on June 30th.
According to Mike the judge held up and printed a version of a Ron Paul's forum post and stated she was furious that her orders had been exposed on the Ron Paul site!
In apparent retaliation, 10 marshals entered the courtroom, intimating that Mike was going to be placed in jail. Although the original order from the court instructed Mike to not offer tax advice or promote trust services, he is now accused of visiting a Dave Chapman web site and of blogging on the Ron Paul forum. Mr. Ioane submitted an affidavit that he himself had not been posting on any blogs or forums, but that other parties were doing so.
Considering Mike is an IRS corruption investigator, it isn't unreasonable or him to research constitutional and Department of Justice sites, as well as tax forums. After all, visiting web sites was not a violation of the court's order-neither was there a "gag order" or any imitation on conducting his customary business.
It makes one wonder, what is this court really after? If someone visits a web site and reads about Hitler, will they be targeted as a Nazi?
He has now been ordered under house arrest. Amazing, even more surprising, his wife, who is not under investigation, has been ordered not to use a computer anywhere on their home or property!
I'm no legal expert, but it looks like Mike is being punished for having his story out there. This behavior on the part of the Fresno court is deeply disturbing.

[bostonteatruth]

It's weirder. Michael Ioane filed a lawsuit claiming there was an illegal search and seizure at his property. He said $30,000 in jewelry was taken and still has not been accounted for by the IRS.

http://www.truthinlaw.org/images/aff...magistrate.pdf. Here, he names the IRS agent as the defendant in the lawsuit--this is the same person who set in motion the initial warrant to arrest him.