Is there a Law in MI
This is a discussion on Is there a Law in MI within the Child Custody & Support forum, part of the FAMILY LAW, DIVORCE, CUSTODY category; Is there a law for divorced couples from michigan that restricts a mother from moving more than 100 miles away ...
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Is there a law for divorced couples from michigan that restricts a mother from moving more than 100 miles away from the father? My mom was told by her ex husband that there was. In my mothers divorce papers all it says is that she can't move out of state. I just need some clarity about this. any help would be appreciated.
Thanx |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am not aware of it and used to live there.
Check with the clerk of the court but if the order says out of state then that is what it usually means--you can move as long as it is in-state and if you want to leave MI you would have to ask the court. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In 2000, Michigan enacted something called "The 100-Mile Rule." This rule says children have a legal residence with each parent. The 100-Mile Rule prevents a parent from moving a child's "legal residence" more than 100 miles from the other parent.
Michigan law has long required all judgments to contain a provision mandating court approval before children may be removed (relocated) from the State of Michigan. The 100-Mile Rule was later enacted to prohibit intrastate moves of more than 100 miles. The legislative purpose was to prevent parents from causing the same disruption of the parent-child relationship caused by an interstate move by moving a long distance in this huge state. [A parent moving from Detroit, Michigan to Copper Harbor, Michigan for example, puts 600 miles between the parents' residences. This is an 11 hour trip each way in good weather. ] Without the 100-Mile Rule, such a move was previously legal. The 100-Mile Rule does not apply where a parent has sole legal custody and primary physical custody. The Court still needs to approve removal of the child; It just doesn't have to give the same kind of consideration to the move. There is no best interest hearing. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,910
|
Good for Michigan. I've seen a lot of horror stories come out of Michigan, but at least they did something right.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmark & Share |
| Tags |
| None |
This thread has 3 replies and has been viewed 225 times
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Minnesota obscenity law: Man cited for cursing in public under 1887 law | forum_admin | Law News | 0 | Sep 11th, 2009 06:44 PM |
| State law on electronic harassment: Cyberbullying case to test Megan's law | forum_admin | Internet Law | 0 | Aug 28th, 2009 04:56 PM |
| UK PERSONAL INJURY LAW & WORKERS COMP LAW OF ONTARIO CANADA | eve | International Law Issues | 0 | Nov 27th, 2008 08:37 PM |
| International Trade law and english law, Fob contracts/term | Unregistered | International Trade Law | 0 | Aug 8th, 2008 05:04 PM |
| Are Pending Cases Ruled Retroactive or Prospective Based on New Law v Precedented Law | Unregistered | Other Criminal Law Matters | 1 | Apr 13th, 2008 11:55 AM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34 PM.










Linear Mode

