WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Family Law, Divorce, Custody > Child Custody & Support
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Child Custody & Support Child custody, support and visitation.

Texas Not Done Fighting, Takes Custody Case to State Supreme Court

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old May 23rd, 2008, 03:30 PM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Jul 16th, 2008 11:37 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 643

Default Texas Not Done Fighting, Takes Custody Case to State Supreme Court



While Texas Legal Aid and libertarian groups hailed yesterday’s ruling from a state appeals court that the state of Texas had no right to seize more than 400 children from the Yearning for Zion Ranch, no one expected the fight to end there.

And apparently it won’t. Child Protective Services has notified the Texas Supreme court that lawyers “will file something today,” according to a spokesman for the court. And they have. Click here for the Department’s petition for a writ of mandamus; here for its motion for relief. Here’s the AP report, and here’s LB coverage of yesterday’s ruling.

Yesterday, in what many believe is the largest custody case in U.S. history, a three-judge panel of Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Austin unanimously ruled that the state failed to show that the children were in immediate danger of sexual or physical abuse when they were rounded up from the YFZ ranch and sent to foster facilities around the state. Technically, the ruling applied only to the children of 38 mothers named in the appeal, but the ruling was broad enough to cover nearly every child swept up in the April raid.

LB Reading Recommendation:

For those Loyal LB’ers who plan to put their work away for the holiday weekend and do some traveling, print out this story, which ran in the most recent issue of Portfolio magazine, and take it with you. It’s a fascinating feature article about Bruce Wisan, an accountant by trade who was hired by the state of Utah to replace Warren Jeffs — the leader of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, which financed the YFZ Ranch — as the head of the community. As Claire Hoffman reports, Wisan, who’s neither a prophet nor a polygamist, has been put in charge of the United Effort Plan, the legal trust that the polygamists started by pooling their resources and creating a communal society 66 years ago. Worth an estimated $110 million, the trust holds a variety of assets, from homes, to farms, to factories, to schoolhouses — not to mention a church and a zoo.

Last edited by top_admin : May 23rd, 2008 at 03:32 PM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ohio death row inmate appeals to US Supreme Court (AP) Yahoo!_news Crimes and Trials News 0 Oct 11th, 2008 07:50 PM
A Good Path to a Supreme Court Argument? Clerk for a Justice WSJ_law_blog Courts, Decisions, Appeals 0 Apr 14th, 2008 01:00 PM
Supreme Court Won't Hear Domestic Spying Challenge FindLaw_blog Law News 0 Feb 19th, 2008 04:31 PM
What if the Supreme Court reversed Roe v. Wade? Unregistered Other Criminal Law Matters 3 Dec 17th, 2007 12:37 PM
Supreme Court Limits Discrimination Suits Unregistered Hiring, Firing, Wrongful Termination 2 May 29th, 2007 03:52 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:42 AM.


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2009 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.