WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Family Law, Divorce, Custody > Child Custody & Support
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Child Custody & Support Child custody, support and visitation.

take current child support to pay overpayments of spousal maintainance

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Apr 28th, 2008, 12:52 AM     #1
Junior Member
 
bedzldnow's Avatar
 
Last Online:
May 3rd, 2008 05:42 AM
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2

Confused take current child support to pay overpayments of spousal maintainance

I live in Arizona. DES-Division of Child Support Enforcement determined my ex-husband to be in arrears of $12,000. He with his attorney requested a hearing to determined arrears. At the hearing, the Judge determined that there were no arrears and in fact there had been an overpayment. I requested a re-calculation (including documents submitted-which though requested I was given only partial and very incomplete) by DES-Division of Child Support Enforcement, as well as a CERTIFIED COPY OF THE HISTORY OF PAYMENTS (which the one being used to make the determination during the hearing WAS NOT A CERTIFIED copy), both of which were ignored. The Judge ruled that the overpayments (which were determined to be Spousal Maintainance only) would be paid back to my ex-husband by ordering a NEW WAGE ASSIGNMENT-which would subtract the overpayment of Spousal Maintainance in increments of $100 from the monthly Child Support Order of $300-for a New Wage Assignment and Child Support Order. Can this be legal? Can a Judge actually take the current child support amount and subtract past overpayments (determined to be SPOUSAL MAINTAINANCE ARREARS ONLY, THEN SPOUSAL MAINTAINANCE OVERPAYMENTS ONLY), from the monies intended to feed and clothe the children? I am in total disbelief of the entire situation. First of all, I was not notified as per the DES and state requirements, I was not provided with documents as per the state's Rules of the Court, nor was the procedure required by DES and the Az office of the Attorney General's Office followed. Second of all, during the hearing, my ex's attorney seemed to call all of the shots, and kept at the Judge until he finally agreed with him and my ex, all the while I, representing myself, seemed to be ignored, and each and every statement and/or question I submitted or any request made was either ignored or pushed under the rug with a lot of technicalities (even the ones I understand and attempted to respond to). Is there not a Statute or Rule within the Child Support Enforcement Laws that states that spousal maintainance arrears and or overpayments may not be taken from or in any form from Child Support Amounts?
bedzldnow is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Powered by U.S. Legal Forms
Old Apr 28th, 2008, 11:38 AM     #2
Top Level Member
 
judg4's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Sep 25th, 2008 02:24 PM
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 450

Default Re: take current child support to pay overpayments of spousal maintainance

Spousal support and child support are two different items and the courts have made many references to the fact that they are separate and different awards.

You may actually prevail on appeal or in a motion for reconsideration.
judg4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28th, 2008, 05:58 PM     #3
Junior Member
 
bedzldnow's Avatar
 
Last Online:
May 3rd, 2008 05:42 AM
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2

Confused Re: take current child support to pay overpayments of spousal maintainance

The case is a little more complicated. When he filed his motion for hearing he didnt tell the court that DCSE already made a determination for order of arears which specifically gave him 30 days to request judicial review. Which he did not file. Ars 12-902 scope of article in short says if review of admin decision was not made you shal be bared from any judicial review. In my response I stated this fact in my points of authority and in my conclusion relief sought I requested that this court find that petitioner did not file a timely request for judicial review , in doing so petitioner is barred from judicial review in this matter as statute dictates. The Commissioner ignored that and the incompleete disclosure of petitioners by not including DCSE determination in his motion for hearing.

Would a motion to reconsider outlining all the facts and statutes as I did In my response. Should I request a finding of facts and conclusion of law in his ruling? As to preserve my right to appeal or special action. During the hearing I objected to his mistakes of law but he said strike that objection everytime. I found some case law on failing to file request for adin review that bars further hearing if not filed .
bedzldnow is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How do i get current child support stopped if child has turned 18? Unregistered Child Custody & Support 15 Dec 31st, 2008 02:16 AM
Divorce decree and current child support Abfab Child Custody & Support 6 Dec 26th, 2008 11:04 PM
child/spousal support in virginia Unregistered Child Custody & Support 5 Sep 9th, 2008 08:42 AM
Child Support/Spousal Support enforcement in California Unregistered Child Custody & Support 1 Aug 5th, 2008 12:29 AM
child support and spousal support Unregistered Child Custody & Support 1 Jan 4th, 2007 06:08 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 AM.


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2009 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.