|
Nov 15th, 2006, 01:16 PM
|
#1 |
Posts: n/a
|
Indian law
In Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 if any person filed section 34 application then all proceeding stop but section 9 maintainable.Is it draw back of the act?
Which setion say if any person got injunction under section 9 Arbitration & Conciliation Act,1996 then 0rder 39 Rule 3 CPC compliance is not reqiured. |
|
|
Nov 15th, 2006, 04:54 PM
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Indian law
Please email WLD at info@worldlawdirect.com (or use the private "Ask An Attorney" web question form on the home page), and briefly list the subject. WLD lawyers will help outline a strategy for you to deal with this. The post you made is on file with WLD staff.
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| INDIAN SECOND MARRIAGE | Unregistered | Indian Law | 10 | Dec 7th, 2008 05:40 PM |
| Indian wants to Marry a Phillipine Girl | jabhi | Other Immigration Law & Visas | 1 | Nov 28th, 2008 03:10 AM |
| Indian Law | top_admin | Legal Help | 0 | Aug 9th, 2008 11:43 AM |
| Art 319 c of Indian constitution | Unregistered | Other Labor Law Matters | 0 | Jun 19th, 2008 10:58 AM |
| Indian Direct Selling Association seeks law to protect consumer interests | Metropolitanjury | International Law News | 1 | Jun 15th, 2008 02:11 AM |
Linear Mode
