Fraud upon the Court by Officers of the Court

Originally Posted by Boo regard's Looking upon the websites out there it would seem there IS extensive fraud upon the court, that consistently goes unpunished by inner circle comrades at arms. It is happening today in America and seems to be extensive in Delaware, the smallest state in the land. Strange!

Yes, it does go unpunished. The case law is fairly rare and much rarer than the occurrences of fraud upon the court.

THE REASON: Try to get another attorney to handle a case where their fellow attorney committed fraud upon the court! They close ranks and refuse to represent you. Most people then give up and don't try to present the case themselves

I had a metter that was even worse then the orginal poster. I had a judge stalk me in college in Albany NY every so often he would order me attacked by the police. When I tried to sue well with in the statue of limitations I was told be courts that they could not be touched and that it was his legal decision. this went on for a few months until i walked into his court and shot the basterd. If the situation is bad enough argue it with the second amendment and take the fifth.

[Phillip Inkel]

Originally Posted by laserhaas@msn.com A judge stated today that she refused to address anyone as a party of interest in fraud on the court matters. (eToys 01-706 Del Bankr 2001). . Today, Feb. 27, 2008 the Judge stated that a party who has confessed to filing a false affidavit can pay himself indemnification fees. The Judge ruled that my company CLI could not raise the issues of Fraud on the Court and that even though the contracts of CLI state that the Debtor shall pay all labor directly, it is too late for me to ask to be paid. . The Plan Administrator asked the Court for permission to pay himself indemnification fees. The Plan states that the Plan Administrator cannot have transactions with related parties Plan clause 3.12. Yet the Court granted the Plan Administrator permission to pay himself. . The Courts state that the Bankruptcy Code grants restriction of Article III standing to parties of interest. Even though my companies contracts, that was drafted by the parties that confessed to filing more than 40 false affidavits, who also received a court order that THEY would submit my paperwork to the Court, discouraging me from having independent counsel. The Court, Her Honor Mary F Walrath, refused to address the Fraud on the Court issue and said the plan clause 3.12 will not be addressed as I do not have her permission to be heard on the issue. Where can one go when one of the firms that confessed to filing false affidavits has a partner within the Dept of Justice who is refusing to prosecute the Fraud. At the same time the Law firm of MNAT is so powerful that the Justice Dept will not even EVER mention the law firm MNAT. . MNAT also has the longest sitting judge on the 3rd Circuit, and the lawyer for MNAT who did the perjury, Werkheiser, clerked for the Senior Judges also. . When the Court throws out the Law and Anarchy is running amuck and gathering strength, where can one turn to in order to find honorable public servants to defend the Constitution?

I am not a lawyer, however, after dealing with numerous frauds upon the courts by officers of the court I have learned the remedy lies in filing an independent action to vacate the judgement due to frauds upon the court by officers of the court. The idea is that due to the frauds upon the court the Party wronged has never truly presented his, her or their case to the court. Thus the court has never truly heard the matter. I also understand that there is no statute of limitations to vacate an order or judgment that has been obtained in this matter. See United States Supreme Court case Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. vs Hartford Empire Co.. For the record the information available suggest that the practice of fraud upon the courts by officers of the court is very prevalent in The Child Protection and Child support Courts. I t also common in the Federal Courts where upon an individual or group bring a lawsuit that contains information regarding unlawful governmental conduct and dishonest governmental services.

Originally Posted by Unregistered What you are describing here simply cannot occur within American Federal Courts. There are too many check and balances.

It is a naive thinking. The courts are full of frauds in robes.

There were several NY Senate hearings on cronyism and corruption of the Courts.

Expose Corrupt Courts: 2nd Sampson Hearing Set for September 24, 2009

This is a step in the right direction and a good example for all states.

The NY Senate has recommended a Task Force be created to look into the issue.

We should all thank those Senators for a good public servant move.

[laserhaas]

Continue to talk about the facts.

Speak Truth as often as you can against tyranny, corruption and cronyism.

We must stand up and Fight for our American way of Life;

or

LET IT GO!

[laserhaas]

The US Supreme Court is going to hear a case about deliberate prosecutorial misconduct - as the prosecutors seek to invoke judicial immunity as sovereign!

We can only hope and pray that the Supreme Court of the land is true to American citizens and not biased to its "group", framework and colleagues.

the story background
Stephen Davis, the attorney for one of the men who spent 25 years behind bars, told Raw Story he had "pretty much assumed" that the Constitution protected his clients if there was prosecutorial misconduct. "I guess it's controversial," he added.

In 1978, Iowa teenagers Curtis McGhee Jr. and Terry Harrington were sentenced to life imprisonment after being convicted of murdering a security guard. After serving more than two decades, both men were released after Harrington obtained "previously undisclosed reports from the Council Bluffs Police Department that pointed to the existence of another suspect for the murder," according to court documents.

The two men claim that in investigating the murder, Pottawattamie County prosecutors had coerced a witness to implicate them, "disregarded obviously false details" of the witness's accounts, "coached" the witness to give an account more consistent with the known facts of the case and then "coerced" other false witness testimony to corroborate that account.

County prosecutors, however, invoked "prosecutorial immunity," a concept University of Iowa College of Law Professor Todd Pettys described to Raw Story as "this notion that no matter what a prosecutor does at trial they can't be sued."