Proper use of "Esq."
This is a discussion on Proper use of "Esq." within the Attorneys & Legal Ethics forum, part of the ATTORNEYS, COURTS, LITIGATION category; This is not exactly an ethics question, but ... Is the use of the legal title "Esq." proper for both ...
POST NEW QUESTION |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Proper use of "Esq."
This is not exactly an ethics question, but ...
Is the use of the legal title "Esq." proper for both male and female attorneys ? Thanks. |
|
| Sponsored Links |
| Our attorneys have years of experience with positive results in the debt reduction / debt relief field. Click here for more information. |
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
either...
2. Abbr. Esq. Used as an honorific usually in its abbreviated form, especially after the name of an attorney or a consular officer: Jane Doe, Esq.; John Doe, Esq. 3. In medieval times, a candidate for knighthood who served a knight as an attendant and a shield bearer. 4. Archaic An English country gentleman; a squire. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Both males and females can use the term Esq. today. It is commonly used for attorneys to show that one is licensed to practice law. You can use "J.D." after your name after you graduate from law school and then "Esq." after you pass the bar. It is like "Dr." for people who have "M.D." degrees.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
DISTRIBUTION
It strikes me that learned counsel lacks the due diligence, attention to detail and capability to research "Esq". As a mere mortal and average citizen I applaud the constitutions prohibition (see Titles of Nobility Amendment and as detailed in Article 1. Section 8 of the Constitution of The United States. Further, the source document states). "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State." I just tell my staff not to hire any attorney that uses the "Esq" as it says the wrong thing about the individual. If they know what it means, then I don't want their services and if they don't know, well then they should and they haven't done their homework. Have a nice day. :-) Last edited by top_admin; Oct 11th, 2008 at 11:46 PM. Reason: link approved |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What a load of pretentious codswallop. Esq., is most definitely a British title of nobility, which has been simply 'assumed' by American solicitors.
It is a complete pretention for an American to assume this title, and to somehow look down their noses at for instance a British Esquire who is using it in its correct context, since it has been most likely granted to him by his monarch. I hold a J.D. but more interestingly by ancestry I am entitled to be addressed as the "Much Honored so & so of such a place." In the UK I might well receive a letter from the Palace calling me J. Bloggs, Esq., that title would of course have nothing to do with my qualification. It is quite ludicrous for Americans to have simply 'assumed' this title as their own and to suddenly expect the British to amend their historical and heraldic customs which date to the Norman Conquests. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Technically no. Some US females wrongly assume this title, but it is a male title of British origin, which is to do with gentry and not occupation. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It's interesting that the legislative bodies that make the laws are predominately lawyers. The laws of an individual state dictate what indications particular professions may use, such as "M.D." for a doctor, "D.D.S" for a dentist, or "P.E." for professional engineeer. However, these lawyer filled legislative bodies haven't seen fit to establish the appropriate honorific for themselves.
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In researching the proper title to be used in corresponding with practicing attorneys-at-law, I came across this dribble. The discussion clearly reflects why the class of attorneys in the USA is considered to be pompous and self-serving. What a lot of crap!
“First thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.” [Shakespeare, King Henry VI, Part II, IV, ii] would probably not result in chaos as is the general interpretation but in a sense of freedom the world has not known for quite some time. Global warming and the financial crises would end, too, once the lawyers shut up and stopped manipulating society. Cheers! |
|
![]() |
| Bookmark & Share |
| Tags |
| None |
This thread has 34 replies and has been viewed 17313 times
«
Georgia - How to confirm Attorney withdrawing
|
Kansas & MIssoure Proper response on applications Kasas
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DSK team: A report said a medical examination listed "assault" and "rape" | Yahoo! News | Crimes and Trials News | 0 | Aug 17th, 2011 01:30 AM |
| Amazon charged my bank "one dollar" for canceling "prime" shipping | Unregistered | Consumer Complaints | 1 | Jan 21st, 2011 10:24 AM |
| The "official legal definition" of the word "public" in China | Unregistered | International Law Issues | 1 | Oct 27th, 2010 04:39 PM |
| Insurance Clauses: "Hold Harmless" and "Waiver of Subrogation" | FrankMooney | Construction & Renovation | 1 | May 28th, 2008 09:29 AM |
| confidential informants: frustrated that police "bargain" with others for a "deal" | Unregistered | Other Criminal Law Matters | 0 | May 14th, 2008 08:49 PM |
Our attorneys have years of experience with positive results in the debt reduction / debt relief field. Click here for more information.
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 PM.




Proper use of "Esq."







Linear Mode

