Jurisdiction and Discovery

This is a discussion on Jurisdiction and Discovery within the Attorneys & Legal Ethics forum, part of the ATTORNEYS, COURTS, LITIGATION category; I reside outside the USA and have no contacts in the USA. I have been fraudlently sued by a US ...

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Mar 31st, 2007, 05:57 AM   #1
Junior Member
 

stormyseas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2

Default Jurisdiction and Discovery

I reside outside the USA and have no contacts in the USA. I have been fraudlently sued by a US corporation that came to my country to do business in my country with a company I work for that has no contacts or business outside our country.

It is very clear from my reading that there is absolutely no way a Californian court can claim jurisdiction. The Plaintiff has permanent and ongoing business in our country and retains lawyers in our country and all buiness was done here. The Plaintiff stated in emails to me that it took action in the US because I would not be able to afford legal representation in the US because legal costs were much higher there.

The law suit is an attempt at extortion to force me to withdraw complaints I made on behalf of my company to regulatory authorities about major fraud and securities fraud by the Plaintiff corporation.

The issue is that I have lodged a Motion to Quash on jurisdictional grounds and Forum Non-conveniens. Although I was forced by circumstances to prepare it myself, I believe I have lodged a very strong and well substantiated case. The hearing on my motion is due to proceed next week.

The Plaintiff's Attorney has now served "Discovery" documents, demanding immediate answers. The questions do not relate to jurisdiction, although she claims the answers are needed to determine jurisdiction. She claims her reply to my motion (which claimed insufficient time to conduct discovery to establish "contacts") entitles her to conduct this discovery and to demand that the court dismiss my motion if I do not reply ahead of the hearing date.

The Plaintiff's Attorney knows that the action is fraudulent (because documentary evidence has been supplied to her) and that it is patently malicious and has been openly declared to be for wrongful purposes of extortion. I believe she is engaging in attempted trickery, taking wrongful advantage of my lack of access to legal advice and lack of knowledge of processes in your country.

Do I have to respond? How do I complain about this conduct if it is, in fact, inappropriate?
stormyseas is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark & Share



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

| More

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Format Your Messages
Add Forum to Google Toolbar
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discovery Unregistered Debt Collection 2 Aug 20th, 2009 10:58 AM
Questions on Discovery and Discovery Cutoff sandyclaus Civil Litigation 1 Jul 26th, 2009 09:53 PM
Discovery fvinhousin Child Custody & Support 2 May 14th, 2009 04:37 PM
AJ EEOC. Discovery \ Unregistered Job Discrimination & Harassment 0 Dec 13th, 2008 11:30 PM
Discovery Unregistered Trials & Sentencing 4 May 30th, 2008 10:10 AM


International Law Issues?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04 PM.