Frauds upon Connecticut Courts by Officers of The Courts

[Phillip Inkel]

I am from Connecticut. My name is Phillip Inkel and I am trying to expose and remedy systemic frauds upon the State and Federal courts in Connecticut by officers of those courts that has deprived my family and I of our rights to present our legal cases to these courts and petition the Government for redresses of our grievances caused by dishonest, corrupt and violent governmental conduct. We have complained to State and Federal law enforcement to no avail. We have complained to Connecticut's Auditors of Public Accounts and Attorney General Richard Blumenthal. Factually we have complained and disseminated information to every Public Institution that we could locate that are supposed to be created for the protection of the public. As a result of our complaining we have been violently retaliated against, disparaged, denied access to the courts and law enforcement. We have no equal protections under the law while numerous persons that have engaged in criminal conduct are protected from public exposure and legal prosecution. I firmly believe based upon nearly two decades of experience with these unconstitutional practices and continuing courses of unlawful governmental conduct that this has been allowed to occur because Connecticuts's Governing Authority have, in part, turned The State and Federal Courts in Connecticut into their own private racketeering enterprises that are abused to primarily conceal unlawful governmental conduct and provide protection for governmental employees and contractors whom have engaged in and continue to engage in fraud, waste, corruption, public theft, abuses of power, abuses of human rights and other such unethical conduct. I can be reached at phillip.inkel@gmail.com .Google Phillip Inkel and you will find a little bit of information. If there is anybody out there thatt would like to contribute to helping us expose and remedy the situation I have described and or would like to review evidence, specifics and particulars please contact us. Any suggestions please.

What is the basis of your complaint?...what frauds?

[Phillip Inkel]

Thank you for asking. There are numerous frauds upon the courts by officers of the courts as they relate to my cases in The Connecticut and Federal Courts. Essentially, because, of knowledge I have regarding numerous acts of criminal unlawful governmental conduct here in Connecticut certain persons clothed with authority of law and administrative powers of court have set about in a scheme to prevent me from presenting my cases to The Connecticut and Federal Courts. Fraud one is Attorneys Jon Schoenhorn (sp), Bill Bloss, James Szereko (sp) and possibly U.S. District Court Judge Dominique Squatrito and Assistant Attorney General Sarnowski along with others conspired to present to The U.S. District Court For The District of Connecticut a false representation of the facts relevant to a murder for hire scheme created by Colchester Police Officers James Nardella, Mark Gendron, Charles Scott Thomas, and State Police Officer Frederick Briger and others. Specifically, the Attorneys involved came to an understanding to eliminate from the Court's view the essential elements of the conspiracy to murder this writer. How? They, the Attorneys and others in law enforcement erased the fact that support that there were numerous meetings between the hit man (Todd Vachon) and the Officers and the plans which included a second hitman (Joe Drum) to stalk and Kill this writer. This account will continue and certainly does not end here.

Yikes---those are some big accusations.

Can't you get the feds to look into it if you don't trust the locals.

[Phillip Inkel]

I, We have gone to Federal Law Enforcement, including various U.S. Attorneys, Public Integrity in Washington, Kevin O'connor, Christopher Droney, Ron Apter, John Durham, and so on. Wrote to Presidents Bush, Obama. Wrote to The Dirtector of National Intelligence and The Governmental Accountability Office. Posted all over the internet, spoke to news organizations. Sued in Federal Court, and defended in State Court. As far as the aforementioned, as Public Institutions set up by The People to protect The people they are broken and dysfunctional as they relate to our cases and other persons and families similarly situated. I say this because I do know that there are numerous crimes committed by governmentally benefitted persons that have been and continue to be covered up via judicial and executive corruption. They, that being various governmentally benefitted persons have conspired to murder me, my witnesses, attempted to murder Joe Drum, tampered and destroyed evidence, fabricated evidence, kidnapped persons, assaulted and battered people, and more and guess what The Feds have done. Nothing except help cover it up. After all the complaining and shouting out we have done you would figure that some responsible person charged with the protection of the Nation and it' inhabitants would at least come and get our facts and either prove us right or wrong. If I could I would go and arrest them myself by law but there are a lot more of them than there are of me and I really dont think I can do it all by myself. A Grand Jury and a posse would be nice.

You may have to actually hire a lawyer at this point

[Phillip Inkel]

Yeah. I kind of figured. Do you have a few in mind that that would be willing to take on such a case.

[Phillip Inkel]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT



PHILLIP INKEL, ET,AL

V

JOSEPH D'ALESIO, ET,AL



OMNIBUS INDEPENDENT ACTION 1. TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO ORDER THE CONNECTICUT SUPERIOR COURT TO SET ASIDE CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS. 2. TO VACATE AND SET ASIDE VARIOUS State of CONNECTICUT AND UNITED STATES FEDERAL COURT JUDGMENTS, ORDERS AND CURRENT PROCEEDINGS BECAUSE SOME OF THEM WERE BROUGHT ABOUT IN BAD FAITH, AND ALL OF THEM ADMINISTERED WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW, AGAINST THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, INTERTWINED WITH UNLAWFUL GOVERNMENTAL CONDUCT, WITHOUT ACTUAL ACCESS TO JUDICIAL REVIEW AND REVERSAL, AND THEY WERE OBTAINED AND OBSTRUCTED FROM JUSTICE VIA PRACTICES, CULTURES. AND PATTERNS OF ABUSES OF JUDICIAL BRANCH ADMINISTRATIVE, INVESTIGATIVE, PROSECUTORIAL, CLERICAL, AND ADJUDICATIVE POWERS AND FRAUDS UPON THE COURTS BY OFFICERS OF THE COURTS THAT SUBJECTS THE PLAINTIFFS TO DEPRIVATIONS OF THEIR BASIC CIVIL RIGHTS. 2. FOR VIOLATION OF THE PLAINTIFFS' RIGHT TO BE FREE FROM RETALIATION OF THE EXERCISE OF THEIR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

This is an action that seeks relief from judgments past, present, and future effecting the Constitutional Rights of The Plaintiffs that were obtained via preventing the plaintiffs access to The State of Connecticut and Federal Courts.

This Complaint and Petition For Redresses of unlawful governmental conduct that subjects the Plaintiffs to deprivations of State and Federal Constitutional Rights is brought against the Defendants because they have caused the injustices inflicted upon the Plaintiffs by allowing, authorizing, impliedly authorizing, directing, controlling, and protecting practices and patterns engaged in by persons working on the Defendants behalf that violate State and Federal law. The primary practice engaged in by Defendants is dishonest governmental services applied to the administrations of Connecticut's courts, law enforcement, child protection, health and human services, and legal services. All Defendants at all relevant times have known and continue to know that governmentaly benefited persons working on behalf of and or in conspiracy with all Defendants while administering governmental services utilize dishonesty daily and have don so since at least 1992 till present. And, will definitely continue to do so till Connecticut's Court and it's executive governing authority of Connecticut are compelled under force of law and This Court's Order to discontinue such practice.

The Defendants each in their own respective field of governmental power are in a position and have Constitutionally mandated responsibilities to stop and prevent unlawful and dishonest governmental services which forms the basis for this Independent Action.

All Defendants Know and have known that fraud applied to the practices of the administration of governance and law enforcement subjects all Plaintiffs to deprivations of rights and discrimination and out right denial of governmental and judicial services.

Each Defendant in conspiracy with each other knowingly violated The Plaintiffs Rights so that the Defendants could benefit themselves and persons working on their behalf.


Each Defendant have conspired to engage in a scheme to turn governmental and Judicial services into their own private racketeering enterprise and violate the Plaintiffs Constitutional Rights.


Because of each Defendant's unlawful governmental conduct and abuse of governmental power each Plaintiff in this case is factually denied and discriminated against from protections, benefits, and fair access to all relevant governmental services.

Because of each Defendant's unlawful governmental conduct and abuse of judicial and legal power each plaintiff is denied and discriminated against from protections, benefits, and fair access to all State of Connecticut and United States Courts.
.

Defendants have engaged in all of the the aforementioned unlawful governmental conduct since at least 1992 and continue to engage in the unlawful conduct till present.



DEFENDANTS ARE 1. RICHARD BLUMENTHAL 2. JOSEPH D'ALESIO 3. JODI RELL. EACH DEFENDANT IS SUED IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY ONLY. EACH DEFENDANT IS AND HAVE BEEN AT ALL RELEVANT TIMES A CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF ADMINISTRATING GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES AND EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC MONEY IN THE OPERATIONS OF CONNECTICUT GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES . RICHARD BLUMENTHAL IS CONNECTICUT'S CHIEF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER AND IS RESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT AND IT'S INHABITANTS ARE PROTECTED FROM HARM SUFFERED THAT ARE AGAINST THE LAW. HE IS SUED BECAUSE HE HAS CONSPIRED TO ABUSE HIS POSITION OF PUBLIC TRUST AND AUTHORIZE AND PROTECT AND CONCEAL UNLAWFUL, DISHONEST, VIOLENT, UNCONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENTAL CONDUCT. JOSEPH D'ALESIO IS THE DE FACTO DIRECTOR OF ALL OF CONNECTICUT'S OPERATIONS AND ADMINISTRATIONS OF IT'S COURTS. HE TOO CONSPIRES TO ENGAGE IN PRACTICES OF ABUSING POSITIONS OF PUBLIC TRUST IN FURTHERANCE OF VIOLENT CRIME IN FURTHERANCE OF PROTECTING PRACTICES OF GOVERNMENTAL RACKETEERING. JODI RELL IS THE CHIEF GOVERNING AUTHORITY OF CONNECTICUT'S ADMINISTRATIONS APPLIED TO ALL GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES. THESE THREE DEFENDANTS MAKE UP THE PRIMARY GOVERNING AUTHORITY OF STATE OF CONNECTICUT GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS.



THE PLAINTIFFS PHILLIP AND MEREDITH INKEL ARE THE PARENTS OF ALL OTHER PLAINTIFFS AND SUE ON THEIR BEHALF. ALL PLAINTIFFS ARE CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES , STATE OF CONNECTICUT. TOWN OF EAST HADDAM AND COLLECTIVELY ARE DEFINED AS A FAMILY.

EACH ACT OR OMISSION OR PRACTICE COMPLAINED OF HEREIN WAS OR IS UNDER COLOR OF LAW, IN BAD FAITH, FOR NON LEGITIMATE GOVERNMENTAL OBJECTIVES, CONCEALED VIA ABUSE OF GOVERNMENTAL POWER AND ARE AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION.

JURISDICTION IS FOUNDED UPON BECAUSE

The Defendants are each aware that since at least 1993 Phillip Inkel and other persons have been witnessing, experiencing, and learning about and complaining of dishonest, violent and other unlawful governmental conduct and disseminating those facts to The Press, Public and Governmental Public Institutions including The Defendants Themselves. Richard Blumenthal, Joseph D'alesio, and Jodi Rell continue to be aware that said unlawful Connecticut Governmental conduct continues till present.

Since 1993 till present Phillip Inkel, Meredith Inkel and Their Family and others similarly situated have been retaliated against on account of their capability, efforts, willingness and persistence to expose and remedy practices of abuse of governmental power and funding. Defendants Blumenthal, D'alesio, and Rell have caused, condoned, authorized, impliedly authorized, encouraged, instructed, required, concealed, approved, demanded, allowed, trained and failed to train persons working on their behalf or benefit in governmental services to engage in practices of racketeering activity that subjects The Plaintiffs and other Persons similarly situated to deprivations of their Federal and State of Connecticut protected and Constitutional Rights.

All persons, acts and actors described herein as offenders of the law are governmentally benefited persons working on or have worked on The Defendants behalf.

Starting in May 1993 Phillip Inkel learned of unlawful, dishonest, violent police conduct commonly practiced in the Colchester, Connecticut area. That same month Inkel initially complained to one of the police officers involved in at least one brutal act witnessed by Inkel. That Officer James Nardella of The Town of Colchester Police began a process of alarming the law enforcement, judicial, court, and other governmental service providers that Phillip Inkel and other persons had knowledge of and were complaining about the practices of unlawful governmental conduct.

The immediate and continuing response of each of The Defendants was and is to retaliate, silence, disparage, threaten, punish and cast aspersions upon Phillip Inkel his family, witnesses via utilizing an allready existing practice of fraudulent and dishonest official services to obstruct justice and protect racketeering involving Federal and Connecticut public funding. The Defendants each abused their respective governmental powers to influence dictate and control the investigative and adjudicative outcomes and work summaries of all governmental activity relating to The Plaintiffs.