Nonparty preclusion post Taylor v. Sturgell - Oral Argument b4 Elizabeth D. Laporte

Originally Posted by Unregistered

The hearing was a sham because the judge didn't really have any interest hearing from the pro se. She already chose sides.

Judges think pro se are second class, if they don't rule in lawyers favor, they feel guilty of sell-out their lawyer own kind. When one side is not white, the other side are whites, the judges will feel more guilty if they don't rule in favor of the whites, even if the judges are black. They need to get their own kind victories. People call them honor, and they feel they are the law. But look at this judge, the behavior is very dishonorable. She sold her soul and her "honor".

Normally, a pro se won't be able to fight back. But when these judges got exposed, they will also take a hit and do pay a price. But the price is worth it, when the side they protect is rich, they will be repaid by who they helped.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Judges think pro se are second class, if they don't rule in lawyers favor, they feel guilty of sell-out their lawyer own kind. When one side is not white, the other side are whites, the judges will feel more guilty if they don't rule in favor of the whites, even if the judges are black. They need to get their own kind victories. People call them honor, and they feel they are the law. But look at this judge, the behavior is very dishonorable. She sold her soul and her "honor".

Normally, a pro se won't be able to fight back. But when these judges got exposed, they will also take a hit and do pay a price. But the price is worth it, when the side they protect is rich, they will be repaid by who they helped.

Black judges have inferiority complex. The average IQ of blacks is lower than whites. So when white say blacks figure out no, the blacks just repeat whites say.

With this kind of shabby judges sitting on the federal bench enjoying lifetime appointment, American people are screwed.