WORLD Law Direct Forums  



Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Attorneys, Courts, Litigation > Attorneys & Legal Ethics
REGISTER FAQ Calendar SEARCH Today's Posts MARK FORUMS READ
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Forum Archive

Attorneys & Legal Ethics Lawyer ethics, practice of law, malpractice, etc.

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button AddThis Social Bookmark Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 06-03-2008, 08:50 PM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
07-16-2008 12:37 PM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 361
Default Fortune Mag: Are Law Profs Trading Bad Advice for Big Bucks?



Back in February, when we spoke to Stanford’s Lawrence Lessig about his decision to refocus his scholarship, from copyright to eliminating the ill-effects of money in politics, he also mentioned that, “in the academic context, there’s corruption in the way that testimony is being bought, which changes how people research.”

We found the allusion provocative, coming as it did from Lessig, a career law prof. At the time we wondered whether there were other profs out there decrying the same perceived problem. Apparently there are: On Fortune magazine’s Web site, Roger Parloff reports that, in a forthcoming Stanford Law Review article titled “The Market for Bad Legal Advice,” Columbia law prof William Simon takes aim at colleagues who are becoming “enablers of pernicious… practices” by trading bad advice for big bucks.

In particular, Parloff’s piece highlights an accusation that Simon, in his law review article, levels against Cornell law school’s Charles Wolfram (pictured). When former Enron CEO Ken Lay was approached by whistle-blower Sherron Watkins about the possibility of an accounting scandal, Lay went to Vinson & Elkins, its outside firm, for a “preliminary investigation.” V&E reported back that all was fine and good, six weeks before Enron blew up. When called before a congressional committee to answer for its legal opinion, it produced a letter from Wolfram blessing its investigation.

In an interview, Wolfram told Parloff that while Simon’s article “makes some interesting points,” it greatly exaggerates any problem that might exist. “[Simon] seems to suggest that giving favorable testimony for a law firm is facilitating future wrongdoing by the law firm,” said Wolfram, who charges $650 an hour. “I think that’s unrealistic. Most of the testimony I’ve done is after the plane crash - the pilot having survived and crawled out of the fuselage. My testimony is that the pilot did not act negligently. [Simon] overinflates its importance.”

Photo: Cornell Law School

Last edited by top_admin : 06-04-2008 at 10:43 AM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
proposed spy law is bad news!! Unregistered Other Criminal Law Matters 0 07-05-2008 01:31 PM
Advice Needed--Protection from Bad Boss Unregistered Construction & Renovation 1 05-07-2008 12:46 PM
bad partner...need advice Unregistered Business Contracts & Partnerships 2 03-28-2008 01:27 PM
Big Law: Which Firms May Miss Bear Business WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 03-17-2008 11:00 PM
Need help! Cheated out of 400 bucks NWEDC Online Purchases & Sales 3 06-26-2007 06:49 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:46 PM.


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct. Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2008 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.