WORLD Law Direct Forums  



Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Attorneys, Courts, Litigation > Attorneys & Legal Ethics
REGISTER Legal Forms FAQ Calendar SEARCH Today's Posts MARK FORUMS READ

Attorneys & Legal Ethics Lawyer ethics, practice of law, malpractice, etc.

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button AddThis Social Bookmark Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 05-12-2008, 05:51 PM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
03-11-2008 02:01 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 242
Default Fen Phen Lawyers, Charged With Bilking Clients, Head to Trial



And speaking of horse racing, the two lawyers who used allegedly misappropriated settlement funds to purchase last year’s Preakness winner, Curlin, are set to head to trial today in federal court in Covington, Kentucky. Last June, the two lawyers — Shirley Cunningham and William Gallion — along with a third, Melbourne Mills, were indicted for allegedly bilking their clients out of about $65 million of a $200 million settlement in a Kentucky case over diet drug Fen Phen.

According to this piece in the Courier Journal, at trial, presided over by district judge William O. Bertelsman, who earlier this year saddled the defendants with some seriously high bail, the prosecution will put on 40 witnesses to show how the lawyers moved money between bank accounts, allegedly violating four laws and 13 ethics rules. Some of the money, the prosecution may show, went to buy a Porsche, a BMW and courtside seats at Rupp Arena, home of the Wildcats. Gallion and Cunningham used part of their settlement cash to purchase Curlin, the 2007 Horse of the Year.

If convicted, the lawyers could receive up to 20 years in prison. The indictment, according to the Courier Journal, also seeks damages of $45 million and the return of more than $20 million that the lawyers placed in a charitable fund that they paid themselves $149,800 each to manage.

The lawyers, who have pleaded not guilty, have conceded that “some matters could have been handled differently, so as to cause less su****ion and criticism,” as one of their lawyers said. But in court papers, the defendants reportedly claim that their former clients were handsomely compensated and that their fees — $75 million for themselves, $30 million for consultants and other lawyers — were approved by a judge, although that judge later resigned after being accused of misconduct in the case. (Their clients reportedly received $74.2 million of the $200 million that the drug-maker now known as Wyeth paid in 2001 to settle the class action.) Also, one of the plaintiffs’ experts wrote in a pretrial report that they “relied heavily on the advice and guidance” of Cincinnati lawyer Stanley Chesley, who negotiated the Fen Phen settlement and is a defendant in the civil suit against the lawyers.

A government expert, Northern Kentucky University law prof Edward Brewer, will testify that Gallion’s claim in 2002 that clients were “thrilled” to give away excess funds to a charitable fund was “bovine excrement,” as he described it in a pretrial report.

Last edited by top_admin : 05-12-2008 at 07:10 PM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Heavyweight Lawyers Going Toe-to-Toe in Parmalat Trial WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 05-16-2008 04:50 PM
Hit my head and passed out. webartbyveronica Injury & Worker's Compensation 1 02-07-2008 09:20 PM
Head Games: Help, before I need Therapy! Laura*lee Child Custody & Support 1 10-25-2007 05:35 AM
Totaled Cobalt-Rental-Head Injury Unregistered Car Accident Claims 1 07-31-2007 08:07 PM
Unreasonable Clients re: renovation Unregistered Construction & Renovation 1 12-01-2006 02:39 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29 AM.


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct. Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2008 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.