Admiralty Law

This is a discussion on Admiralty Law within the Areas of Law forum, part of the Create Wiki Article category; Admiralty law (also referred to as maritime law ) is a distinct body of law which governs maritime questions and ...

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply

 

Article Tools Search this Article Rate Article Display Modes
  #1  

Default Admiralty Law

Admiralty law (also referred to as maritime law) is a distinct body of law which governs maritime questions and offenses. It is a body of private international law governing the relationships between private entities which operate vessels on the oceans. It is distinguished from the Law of the Sea, which is a body of public international law dealing with navigational rights, mineral rights, jurisdiction over coastal waters and international law governing relationships between nations.

Admiralty Law in the United States

Admiralty law or maritime law is the distinct body of law (both substantive and procedural) governing navigation and shipping. Topics associated with this field in legal reference works may include: shipping; navigation; waters; commerce; seamen; towage; wharves, piers, and docks; insurance; maritime liens; canals; and recreation. Piracy (ship hijacking) is also an aspect of admiralty.

The courts and Congress seek to create a uniform body of admiralty law both nationally and internationally in order to facilitate commerce. The federal courts derive their exclusive jurisdiction over this field from the Judiciary Act of 1789 and from Article III, § 2 of the U.S. Constitution. Congress regulates admiralty partially through the Commerce Clause. American admiralty law formerly applied only to American tidal waters. It now extends to any waters navigable within the United States for interstate or foreign commerce. In such waters admiralty jurisdiction includes maritime matters not involving interstate commerce, including recreational boating.

Admiralty law in the United States developed from the British admiralty courts present in most of the American colonies. These courts functioned separately from courts of law and equity. With the Judiciary Act, though, Congress placed admiralty under the jurisdiction of the federal district courts. Although admiralty shares much in common with the civil law, it is separate from it. Common law does not act as binding precedent on admiralty courts, but it and other law may be used when no law on point is available.

Parties subject to admiralty may not contract out of admiralty jurisdiction, and states may not infringe on admiralty jurisdiction either judicially or legislatively. Since admiralty courts, however, are courts of limited jurisdiction (which does not extend to non-maritime matters), 28 USC § 1333(1), the "Savings to Suitors Clause," does provide for concurrent state jurisdiction so that non-admiralty remedies will not be foreclosed. Moreover, state courts may have jurisdiction where the matter is primarily local.

Under admiralty, the ship's flag determines the source of law. For example, a ship flying the American flag in the Persian Gulf would be subject to American admiralty law; and a ship flying a Norwegian flag in American waters will be subject to Norwegian admiralty law. This also applies to criminal law governing the ship's crew. But the ship must be flying the flag legitimately; that is, there must be more than insubstantial contact between the ship and its flag, in order for the law of the flag to apply. American courts may refuse jurisdiction where it would involve applying the law of another country, although in general international law does seek uniformity in admiralty law.

Just as the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure placed law and equity under the same jurisdiction in 1938, the 1966 rules subsumed admiralty. Nonetheless, the Supplemental Admiralty Rules take precedence over the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in the event of conflict between the two.

Read more:
Admiralty | LII / Legal Information Institute

Maritime Injury?

Injured at sea... Do you have a case? Contact WORLD Law Direct's experienced maritime and admiralty lawyers - Present your case now!


Contributors: forum_admin, top_admin
Created by top_admin, Oct 2nd, 2008 at 10:42 PM
Last edited by forum_admin, Nov 21st, 2008 at 03:02 PM
0 Comments , 628 Views
(Article Protected)
Reply

Bookmark & Share



Article Tools Search this Article
Search this Article:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

| More

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Format Your Messages
Add Forum to Google Toolbar
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LA passes law limiting roosters. New law carries fines of up to $250 forum_admin Miscellaneous Topics 0 Sep 22nd, 2009 04:59 PM
Minnesota obscenity law: Man cited for cursing in public under 1887 law forum_admin Law News 0 Sep 11th, 2009 06:44 PM
State law on electronic harassment: Cyberbullying case to test Megan's law forum_admin Internet Law 0 Aug 28th, 2009 04:56 PM
UK PERSONAL INJURY LAW & WORKERS COMP LAW OF ONTARIO CANADA eve International Law Issues 0 Nov 27th, 2008 08:37 PM
Are Pending Cases Ruled Retroactive or Prospective Based on New Law v Precedented Law Unregistered Other Criminal Law Matters 1 Apr 13th, 2008 11:55 AM


Forming an off-shore company? We can assist you in forming your company in 40 countries worldwide.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:06 PM.